Public Service Pensions and Judicial Offices Bill [ Lords ] (First sitting) Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate
Department: HM Treasury

Public Service Pensions and Judicial Offices Bill [ Lords ] (First sitting)

David Simmonds Excerpts
David Simmonds Portrait David Simmonds (Ruislip, Northwood and Pinner) (Con)
- Hansard - -

I want to put on the record my interest in the matter before us: I am a member in scope of one of the pension schemes, I am married to a member in scope of one of the others, and a former scheme board member of another of the schemes.

Simon Clarke Portrait Mr Clarke
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I thank all hon. Members for their contributions. It is important to clarify one of the misapprehensions about what has happened over the course of the passage of this legislation to the issue that we are working to address. The Government did not, as it has been described, make a mistake. We inserted transitional protections into the scheme after the recommendations of Lord Hutton, expressly at the request of the trade union movement. It is important to establish that the request for transitional protections to be inserted was a trade union-led request. That is what triggered the discrimination action against the Government, which we are now working to address. I would defend the Government’s record here quite strongly; this is not something that we have brought about. None the less, we are obviously working in good faith to seek to address it.