Great initiative by @Newnham_College Really hope schools will encourage their 6th form girls to apply to take part, esp students bright enough to consider @Cambridge_Uni but perhaps daunted about applying https://t.co/46dc21Myjf
Princes Risborough, Buckinghamshire https://t.co/z8y7MYggXs
@BrodEU @timesredbox @BrunoBrussels Yes, as I argue, there's a trade-off. But future EU rules may develop (bigger risk now we don't have say in writing them) in ways where balance of UK interests lies in not following them. I wanted remain, but leave won the public vote. We have to deal with the world as it is
@Peradventur3 @GeorgeFreemanMP @timesredbox I agree: that's why I campaigned to remain. But we've now left. Ministers now have to judge pros & cons of divergence & alignment case by case. There's a trade-off each time: does UK benefit most from privileged access to EU mkt or freedom to set own rules
@markhughes Your argument was that environment, employment etc standards would not be enforced now we've left EU. My point is that it's the same UK regulators & courts now as then that do the enforcement & that the law, retained from the EU, has not changed.
@markhughes No it's not moot at all. Any individual, business or govt agency breaching statutory duties inc those embodied in retained EU law is subject to action by regulators &/or in court. When we were in EU, UK regulators & courts enforced those standards - same applies now
Actually no, before leaving the EU Withdrawal Act 2018 transferred almost all existing EU law onto a domestic statutory footing. So it stays in force unless/until amended by new legislation. https://t.co/RRovQprvMM
@Jesse_Norman @AdamWagner1 0r 1297 reissue?
@MatthewdAncona @NHS Thanks Matt.
@COdendahl ??