Debates between Dave Robertson and Gavin Williamson during the 2024 Parliament

House of Lords (Hereditary Peers) Bill

Debate between Dave Robertson and Gavin Williamson
Gavin Williamson Portrait Sir Gavin Williamson
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

Is there no one new to give way to?

Gavin Williamson Portrait Sir Gavin Williamson
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I will give way to the hon. Gentleman.

Dave Robertson Portrait Dave Robertson
- Hansard - -

I thank my neighbour, the right hon. Member for Great Wyrley, Penkridge and Stone—apologies, I might have got that the wrong way around—for giving way. He has been selectively quoting from the Labour party manifesto. He says the manifesto says we will introduce a retirement age for peers, but fails to mention that the sentence starts with the words:

“At the end of the Parliament.”

I know the Conservative party had a problem sticking to Parliaments lasting five years and that we have had a lot of elections recently, but as far as I am aware, this Government do not intend to have quite so many elections. We intend to be here and pass a large amount of legislation. Will the right hon. Member response to that point?

Gavin Williamson Portrait Sir Gavin Williamson
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I hate to correct my neighbour, but as I have the Labour party manifesto in front of me, I will read it to him.

“The next Labour government will therefore bring about an immediate modernisation, by introducing legislation to remove the right of hereditary peers to sit and vote in the House of Lords. Labour will also introduce a mandatory retirement age. At the end of the Parliament in which a member reaches 80 years of age, they will be required to retire from the House of Lords.”

So the manifesto talks about when the Member will retire not when the legislation will be introduced. We know the Paymaster General is an aspiring radical, potentially—