Information between 6th April 2026 - 16th April 2026
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.
| Division Votes |
|---|
|
15 Apr 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context Darren Paffey voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 252 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 254 Noes - 144 |
|
15 Apr 2026 - Deferred Division - View Vote Context Darren Paffey voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 290 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 299 Noes - 169 |
|
15 Apr 2026 - Deferred Division - View Vote Context Darren Paffey voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 274 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 278 Noes - 73 |
|
15 Apr 2026 - Deferred Division - View Vote Context Darren Paffey voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 276 Labour Aye votes vs 1 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 281 Noes - 70 |
|
15 Apr 2026 - Deferred Division - View Vote Context Darren Paffey voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 281 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 356 Noes - 90 |
|
15 Apr 2026 - Deferred Division - View Vote Context Darren Paffey voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 284 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 300 Noes - 101 |
|
15 Apr 2026 - Deferred Division - View Vote Context Darren Paffey voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 237 Labour Aye votes vs 12 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 247 Noes - 21 |
|
15 Apr 2026 - Deferred Division - View Vote Context Darren Paffey voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 271 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 277 Noes - 158 |
|
15 Apr 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context Darren Paffey voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 252 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 259 Noes - 136 |
|
15 Apr 2026 - Deferred Division - View Vote Context Darren Paffey voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 285 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 291 Noes - 174 |
|
15 Apr 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context Darren Paffey voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 263 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 277 Noes - 150 |
|
15 Apr 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context Darren Paffey voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 262 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 271 Noes - 95 |
|
15 Apr 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context Darren Paffey voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 269 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 275 Noes - 159 |
|
14 Apr 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context Darren Paffey voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 295 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 307 Noes - 176 |
| Written Answers |
|---|
|
Building Safety Regulator
Asked by: Darren Paffey (Labour - Southampton Itchen) Wednesday 8th April 2026 Question to the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government: To ask the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government, what the remit is of the external remediation team at the Building Safety Regulator; and how it is engaging with stakeholders on applications. Answered by Samantha Dixon - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Housing, Communities and Local Government) The External Remediation team assess building control applications for proposed remediation works to the external envelope of a building, such as cladding, renders, and balconies. Individual team members liaise with the applicant throughout the application lifecycle, updating them on key milestones and offering wider support through regular educational webinars. An Account Manager function was established in March 2026 responsible for proactively identifying and engaging with key stakeholders to support improvements in the quality of applications.
A new Remediation Enforcement Unit (REU) became operational in March 2026. The Building Safety Regulator (BSR) has identified 650 registered higher-risk buildings that have either combustible Aluminium Composite Material (ACM) or high-pressure laminate as part of their external wall system. The principal accountable persons of buildings with combustible ACM have been directed to apply for a building assessment certificate and are already being assessed via that route.
During April, the REU will contact the remaining buildings to ask for a relevant fire risk assessment and plan, and check that the removal (of cladding) proposal is appropriate to the materials and layout.
The REU is also investigating 83 buildings referred to the BSR by the Cladding Safety Scheme (run by Homes England) with unconfirmed combustible materials. The REU has ruled out 20 of these buildings as not having combustible materials, with the remainder being contacted to provide the necessary fire risk assessments and plans. |
|
Building Safety Regulator
Asked by: Darren Paffey (Labour - Southampton Itchen) Wednesday 8th April 2026 Question to the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government: To ask the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government, what progress the remediation enforcement unit within the Building Safety Regulator has made on its objectives. Answered by Samantha Dixon - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Housing, Communities and Local Government) The External Remediation team assess building control applications for proposed remediation works to the external envelope of a building, such as cladding, renders, and balconies. Individual team members liaise with the applicant throughout the application lifecycle, updating them on key milestones and offering wider support through regular educational webinars. An Account Manager function was established in March 2026 responsible for proactively identifying and engaging with key stakeholders to support improvements in the quality of applications.
A new Remediation Enforcement Unit (REU) became operational in March 2026. The Building Safety Regulator (BSR) has identified 650 registered higher-risk buildings that have either combustible Aluminium Composite Material (ACM) or high-pressure laminate as part of their external wall system. The principal accountable persons of buildings with combustible ACM have been directed to apply for a building assessment certificate and are already being assessed via that route.
During April, the REU will contact the remaining buildings to ask for a relevant fire risk assessment and plan, and check that the removal (of cladding) proposal is appropriate to the materials and layout.
The REU is also investigating 83 buildings referred to the BSR by the Cladding Safety Scheme (run by Homes England) with unconfirmed combustible materials. The REU has ruled out 20 of these buildings as not having combustible materials, with the remainder being contacted to provide the necessary fire risk assessments and plans. |
|
Buildings: Safety
Asked by: Darren Paffey (Labour - Southampton Itchen) Wednesday 8th April 2026 Question to the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government: To ask the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government, if he will publish details of the new batching model being trialled by the Building Safety Regulator to reduce the length of time taken to assess building control applications, including the number of applications being considered. Answered by Samantha Dixon - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Housing, Communities and Local Government) The Building Safety Regulator (BSR) publishes monthly data on Building Control Approval applications, including progress on the batching pilot launched in September 2025. Latest data, published in February 2026, showed average approval times for new cases of 18 weeks, representing an almost threefold improvement in processing times when compared to May-July 2025. More complex cases managed through Account Managers are taking around 25 weeks on average for approval.
The BSR has also addressed the backlog of legacy Gateway 2 applications through a substantial expansion of operational capacity and the integration of specialist expertise. These measures have strengthened decision-making, sped up the processing of both new‑build and remediation cases, and supported more efficient partnership working with industry.
In parallel, enhanced guidance, developed jointly with the Construction Leadership Council, is supporting applicants to submit clearer, higher‑quality applications that demonstrate compliance, helping to further reduce determination times.
There are currently four live Gateway 2 applications within the Stockport constituency (SK1–SK5): two remediation cases and two Category A applications. |
|
Support for Mortgage Interest
Asked by: Darren Paffey (Labour - Southampton Itchen) Monday 13th April 2026 Question to the Department for Work and Pensions: To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, what the average processing time is for a support for mortgage interest claim; and what proportion of claims have been approved over the last two years. Answered by Stephen Timms - Minister of State (Department for Work and Pensions) In answer to your first question, we do not record processing times for Support for Mortgage Interest (SMI) Loans. This is because the start date of the process is not consistently defined or easily identifiable. There is flexibility built into the timings of the process to meet the needs of the customer. As SMI is a loan, those offered the loan can choose to accept or decline at any time and payments can be backdated to the day someone first became eligible.
On your second question, all eligible benefit recipients are offered a loan when they become eligible for SMI and they can choose to accept or decline. We publish the number of households receiving SMI on a bi-annual basis here. |
| Select Committee Documents |
|---|
|
Tuesday 14th April 2026
Correspondence - Letter from the Children's Commissioner on Realising potential: Delivering the Child Poverty Strategy 31.03.26 Education Committee Found: www.imohub.org.uk Children’s Commissioner’s office 11th Floor, 64 Victoria Street, London, SW1E 6QP Darren Paffey |
| Calendar |
|---|
|
Tuesday 14th April 2026 9:30 a.m. Education Committee - Oral evidence Subject: SEND White Paper At 10:00am: Oral evidence Margaret Mulholland - Head of SEND & Inclusion Policy at Association of School and College Leaders (ASCL) Daniel Kebede - General Secretary at National Education Union Amanda Serjeant - Vice Chair of Children, Young People and Families Policy Committee at Local Government Association (LGA) Jane Harris - CEO at Speech and Language UK At 11:00am: Oral evidence Kate Cox - Senior Solicitor at Independent Provider of Special Education Advice Hayley Harding - Founder at Let Us learn Too Ms Katie Ghose - CEO at Kids Anna Bird - Chair at Disabled Children's Partnership, and CEO at Contact View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Tuesday 21st April 2026 9:30 a.m. Education Committee - Oral evidence Subject: Screen Time and Social Media At 10:00am: Oral evidence Ali Laws - Director of Public Policy for Northern Europe at TikTok Rebecca Stimson - Director of Public Policy UK at Meta Laura Higgins - Senior Director, Community Safety and Civility at Roblox Sanjit Gill - Head of Policy (UK and Ireland) at Snapchat At 11:00am: Oral evidence Professor Pete Etchells - Professor of Psychology and Science Communication at Bath Spa University Professor Victoria Goodyear - Professor of Physical Activity, Health and Wellbeing at University of Birmingham Professor Amy Orben - Research Professor at the MRC Cognition and Brain Sciences at University of Cambridge View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Tuesday 28th April 2026 9 a.m. Education Committee - Oral evidence Subject: Screen Time and Social Media At 9:45am: Oral evidence Esther Ghey - Founder and Director at Brianna Ghey Legacy Project Mr Andy Burrows - CEO at Molly Rose Foundation Rani Govender - Associate Head of Policy and Public Affairs at National Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Children (NSPCC) At 10:45am: Oral evidence Daniel Kebede - General Secretary at National Education Union (NEU) Tom Middlehurst - Deputy Director of Policy at The Association of School and College Leaders (ASCL) Darren Northcott - National Official (Education) at NASUWT The Teachers' Union At 11:30am: Oral evidence Jacqueline Beauchere - Senior Director, Global Head of Platform Safety at Snapchat View calendar - Add to calendar |