Oral Answers to Questions Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate

Oral Answers to Questions

Dan Rogerson Excerpts
Thursday 24th March 2011

(13 years, 9 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
Lord Barker of Battle Portrait Gregory Barker
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I profoundly disagree with the right hon. Gentleman. We have not cut the budget for the feed-in tariff scheme. We have put in place proper financial controls to ensure that there is money in the system through to 2014. I would be happy to meet him to discuss this matter further, but he must remember that the tariff changes apply only to systems larger than 50 kW, which is equivalent to the size of two tennis courts, and not to domestic housing.

Dan Rogerson Portrait Dan Rogerson (North Cornwall) (LD)
- Hansard - -

Will my hon. Friend consider the letter has been sent to the Secretary of State from the Wadebridge Renewable Energy Network—the WREN group—in my constituency about community-based projects that might be bigger than the new threshold?

Lord Barker of Battle Portrait Gregory Barker
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

Community-based projects that are larger than 50 kW—about the size of two tennis courts—and up to 150 kW, which is significantly larger, will still get a tariff comparable to that paid in Germany. We should be competitive with Europe, and the pressure should be on manufacturers to reduce the cost of their products rather than to provide bonuses. We hope that many community projects, particularly those around the 100 kW size, will still be able to go ahead, but the pressure must be on manufacturers to bring down their prices.