To match an exact phrase, use quotation marks around the search term. eg. "Parliamentary Estate". Use "OR" or "AND" as link words to form more complex queries.


Keep yourself up-to-date with the latest developments by exploring our subscription options to receive notifications direct to your inbox

Written Question
NHS: Complaints
Thursday 25th June 2026

Asked by: Damien Egan (Labour - Bristol North East)

Question to the Department of Health and Social Care:

To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, what steps his Department are taking to ensure local Integrated Care Boards are giving adequate resourcing to (a) customer service, (b) complaints and (c) appeals teams.

Answered by Preet Kaur Gill

It is for integrated care boards (ICBs) to determine how to make best use of their resources to deliver their duties and responsibilities and meet the healthcare needs of their local populations.

Specifically on complaints, the Local Authority Social Services and National Health Service Complaints (England) Regulations 2009 set out in law the minimum standards National Health Service organisations must adhere to in respect of their complaint handling arrangements.

When ICB responsibilities increased to include primary care commissioning in April 2023, additional complaints handlers were moved into ICB structures, to complement their existing complaints handling resource. As part of the 2026/27 national oversight framework, published on 11 June 2026, new reporting will commence to understand how well ICBs have discharged their duties, as referenced in complaints regulations.


Division Vote (Commons)
24 Jun 2026 - Climate Change - View Vote Context
Damien Egan (Lab) voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 261 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 329 Noes - 94
Division Vote (Commons)
24 Jun 2026 - Climate Change - View Vote Context
Damien Egan (Lab) voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 264 Labour Aye votes vs 1 Labour No votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 332 Noes - 94
Division Vote (Commons)
24 Jun 2026 - Deferred Division - View Vote Context
Damien Egan (Lab) voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 315 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 323 Noes - 160
Division Vote (Commons)
24 Jun 2026 - Climate Change - View Vote Context
Damien Egan (Lab) voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 267 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 330 Noes - 93
Division Vote (Commons)
24 Jun 2026 - Customs - View Vote Context
Damien Egan (Lab) voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 315 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 323 Noes - 160
Division Vote (Commons)
23 Jun 2026 - Puberty Blockers - View Vote Context
Damien Egan (Lab) voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 270 Labour No votes vs 3 Labour Aye votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 112 Noes - 283
Division Vote (Commons)
23 Jun 2026 - Defence Spending and Readiness - View Vote Context
Damien Egan (Lab) voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 288 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 294 Noes - 110
Written Question
Multiple Occupation
Monday 22nd June 2026

Asked by: Damien Egan (Labour - Bristol North East)

Question to the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government:

To ask the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government, what assessment he has made of Local Authority’s experience of introducing Article 4 Directions covering Houses in Multiple Occupation; and whether any proposals will be brought forward to simplify this process.

Answered by Matthew Pennycook - Minister of State (Housing, Communities and Local Government)

My Department engages regularly with local authorities about a range of planning matters, including those that have introduced an ‘Article 4’ direction.

Between 16 December 2025 and 10 March 2026, we consulted on a new National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF). That consultation, which can be found on gov.uk here, included proposals for a more flexible policy in relation to the use of Article 4 so local planning authorities can remove

permitted development rights where it is necessary to protect the amenity or well-being of an area, for instance to support the renewal of towns centres or where there is an overconcentration of small Houses in Multiple Occupation.

We are currently analysing the feedback received and will publish our response in due course.


Written Question
Companies House: Revenue and Customs
Wednesday 17th June 2026

Asked by: Damien Egan (Labour - Bristol North East)

Question to the Department for Business and Trade:

To ask the Secretary of State for Business and Trade, for what reason Companies House is using Authorised Corporate Service Providers as an alternative method for HMRC contact.

Answered by Blair McDougall - Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State (Department for Business, Innovation, Science and Trade) (Jointly with the Department for Energy Security and Net Zero)

Authorised Corporate Service Providers (ACSPs) are agents that can verify the identities of their clients and file information with Companies House on their behalf. They are not an alternative method for HMRC contact.