Debates between Damian Hinds and Henry Smith during the 2019-2024 Parliament

Oral Answers to Questions

Debate between Damian Hinds and Henry Smith
Monday 17th January 2022

(2 years, 9 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Henry Smith Portrait Henry Smith (Crawley) (Con)
- View Speech - Hansard - - - Excerpts

T5. Historically, security-sensitive information has been shared with the Opposition Front Bench, but given last week’s revelations that a former Labour Front-Bench spokesman was in receipt of significant funding from a member of the Chinese Communist party, will there be a review of that arrangement?

Damian Hinds Portrait The Minister for Security and Borders (Damian Hinds)
- View Speech - Hansard - -

I am conscious of the statement to follow, but my hon. Friend is right that those are concerning matters. In truth, they are not restricted to a single British politician or a single party. The security briefings that he mentioned continue to play an important role.

Oral Answers to Questions

Debate between Damian Hinds and Henry Smith
Thursday 15th October 2020

(4 years ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Henry Smith Portrait Henry Smith (Crawley) (Con)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

What assessment the sponsor body has made of the potential merits of establishing the parliamentary estate and its immediate environs as a planning authority.

Damian Hinds Portrait Damian Hinds (East Hampshire)
- Hansard - -

The sponsor body has not assessed the merits of the approach recommended by my hon. Friend, but that was considered by the Joint Committee on the Draft Parliamentary Buildings (Restoration and Renewal) Bill. It recognised that there was no easy way to streamline the process but that engagement is key, and that is the advice that the programme seeks to heed.

Henry Smith Portrait Henry Smith [V]
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I encourage the Parliamentary Works Sponsor Body to look again at Parliament creating itself as its own planning authority, as in the past there have been difficulties carrying out parliamentary works when that has involved Westminster City Council, the Greater London Authority and others. I believe that that would create a much easier method for restoration and renewal. Will my right hon. Friend look at this issue again?

Damian Hinds Portrait Damian Hinds
- Hansard - -

I am grateful to my hon. Friend. Of course, wider planning considerations affecting the parliamentary estate are a matter for the parliamentary authorities rather than the programme itself. I just mention that enacting the change that he mentioned would require primary legislation or an amendment to the Parliamentary Buildings (Restoration and Renewal) Act 2019, which, as they say in House business management circles, would have to compete against other priorities.