To match an exact phrase, use quotation marks around the search term. eg. "Parliamentary Estate". Use "OR" or "AND" as link words to form more complex queries.


Keep yourself up-to-date with the latest developments by exploring our subscription options to receive notifications direct to your inbox

Written Question
Mental Health Services: Schools
Thursday 5th February 2026

Asked by: Damian Hinds (Conservative - East Hampshire)

Question to the Department of Health and Social Care:

To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, for each wave of Mental Health Support Teams up to Wave 12, what the anticipated ratio of FTE clinical staff (a) was and (b) is in the Mental Health Support Team to pupil numbers in the schools covered.

Answered by Zubir Ahmed - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department of Health and Social Care)

Mental Health Support Teams (MHSTs) typically comprise of approximately eight full-time equivalent (FTE) clinical staff. Each team was anticipated to cover a population of between 8,000 and 8,500 children and young people. This figure refers to the total population covered by an MHST, not the number of children and young people receiving direct care.

The most recent coverage analysis indicates that MHSTs support an average population of approximately 8,300 children and young people. This equates to a current estimated ratio of FTE clinical staff to children and young people of approximately 1:1,037.

In July 2025, the National Children’s Bureau published an independent MHST evaluation report, Evaluating the implementation of the Transforming Children and Young People’s Mental Health Provision Green Paper programme. According to survey data published as part of this report, 86% of respondents in schools and colleges were satisfied or very satisfied with the direct interventions that the MHST provided for pupils/students or families. The evaluation report is available at the following link:

https://www.ncb.org.uk/what-we-do/practice-and-programmes/building-integrated-child-centred-health-services/mental-2


Division Vote (Commons)
4 Feb 2026 - Climate Change - View Vote Context
Damian Hinds (Con) voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 98 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 392 Noes - 116
Division Vote (Commons)
3 Feb 2026 - Universal Credit (Removal of Two Child Limit) Bill - View Vote Context
Damian Hinds (Con) voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 97 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 458 Noes - 104
Written Question
Further Education: Business Rates
Tuesday 3rd February 2026

Asked by: Damian Hinds (Conservative - East Hampshire)

Question to the HM Treasury:

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, if she will make an assessment of the potential implications for her policies on Further Education Colleges of (a) business rates revaluation and (b) the new multiplier bands from April 2026.

Answered by Dan Tomlinson - Exchequer Secretary (HM Treasury)

I refer the hon. Member to the answer given in UIN 104727.


Written Question
Special Educational Needs: Finance
Friday 30th January 2026

Asked by: Damian Hinds (Conservative - East Hampshire)

Question to the Department for Education:

To ask the Secretary of State for Education, with reference to statement in the OBR’s report entitled Economic and fiscal outlook November 2025, page 122, that the Government has announced in the Budget that SEND provision will be fully absorbed into existing RDEL limits from 2028-29, whether this absorption will be in the Department for Education’s budget.

Answered by Georgia Gould - Minister of State (Education)

The autumn budget made clear that future special educational needs and disabilities funding implications will be managed within the overall government departmental expenditure limits envelope, such that the government would not expect local authorities to need to fund future special educational needs costs from general funds, once the statutory override ends at the end of 2027/28.


Speech in Commons Chamber - Wed 28 Jan 2026
Youth Unemployment

"There are many ways that we can express it, but none of them are good: youth unemployment is at 15.9%; it is up 10%; it is up 1.5 percentage points; it is up over 100,000 in the last year; it is at a 10-year high—higher than in the covid era.

…..."

Damian Hinds - View Speech

View all Damian Hinds (Con - East Hampshire) contributions to the debate on: Youth Unemployment

Speech in Commons Chamber - Wed 28 Jan 2026
Youth Unemployment

"I am not making a political point. I think it is right and reasonable to give employees visibility, and all good employers who want to keep their employees will of course do the right thing and try to do so. The Employment Rights Act, however, does an awful lot more …..."
Damian Hinds - View Speech

View all Damian Hinds (Con - East Hampshire) contributions to the debate on: Youth Unemployment

Speech in Commons Chamber - Wed 28 Jan 2026
Youth Unemployment

"Is that for this financial year?..."
Damian Hinds - View Speech

View all Damian Hinds (Con - East Hampshire) contributions to the debate on: Youth Unemployment

Speech in Commons Chamber - Wed 28 Jan 2026
Youth Unemployment

"Would the Minister apply that principle to bank staff working in the national health service who have what is in fact a zero-hours contract—a bank staff contract—to top up in other roles in the NHS when that support is needed?..."
Damian Hinds - View Speech

View all Damian Hinds (Con - East Hampshire) contributions to the debate on: Youth Unemployment

Speech in Commons Chamber - Wed 28 Jan 2026
Youth Unemployment

"It was about the Minister’s projection for the Connect to Work numbers by the end of this financial year, its first year in operation...."
Damian Hinds - View Speech

View all Damian Hinds (Con - East Hampshire) contributions to the debate on: Youth Unemployment