Prostitution: Newham Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate
Department: Ministry of Justice
Monday 21st March 2011

(13 years, 8 months ago)

Ministerial Corrections
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Lyn Brown Portrait Lyn Brown
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

To ask the Secretary of State for Justice how many convictions there were for (a) kerb crawling, (b) soliciting for the purposes of prostitution in a public place, (c) keeping a brothel and (d) control of prostitution in respect of offences committed in the London borough of Newham in (i) 2008, (ii) 2009 and (iii) 2010.

[Official Report, 17 January 2011, Vol. 521, c. 652-53W.]

Letter of correction from Mr Crispin Blunt:

An error has been identified in the written answer given to the hon. Member for West Ham (Lyn Brown) on 17 January 2011. The figures in the table for the number of defendants convicted for keeping a brothel in the Metropolitan police force area were incorrect along with some of the information included in the footnotes that accompanied the table.

The full answer given was as follows:

Crispin Blunt Portrait Mr Blunt
- Hansard - -

The number of defendants found guilty at all courts for selected prostitution related offences in the Metropolitan police force area for the years 2008 to 2009 can be viewed in the table.

Information at borough level is not collated centrally by the Ministry of Justice.

Court proceedings data for 2010 are planned for publication in the spring.

Number of defendants found guilty at all courts for selected prostitution related offences in the Metropolitan police force area for the years 2008-091,2,3

Offence

2008

2009

Kerb crawling

165

117

Soliciting for the purposes of prostitution in a public place

114

65

Keeping a brothel

5

10

Control of prostitution

16

4

1 The figures given in the table on court proceedings relate to persons for whom these offences were the principal offences for which they were dealt with. When a defendant has been found guilty of two or more offences it is the offence for which the heaviest penalty is imposed. Where the same disposal is imposed for two or more offences, the offence selected is the offence for which the statutory maximum penalty is the most severe.

2 Every effort is made to ensure that the figures presented are accurate and complete. However, it is important to note that these data have been extracted from large administrative data systems generated by the courts and police forces. As a consequence, care should be taken to ensure data collection processes and their inevitable limitations are taken into account when those data are used.

3 Includes the following statutes and corresponding offence descriptions:

Kerb, crawling:

Sexual Offences Act 1985, S.1

kerb crawling

Sexual Offences Act 1985, S.2

Persistent soliciting of person or persons for the purpose of prostitution

Soliciting for the purposes of prostitution in a public place:

Sexual Offences Act 1985, S.1

Common prostitute loitering or soliciting for the purpose of prostitution

Keeping a brothel:

Sexual Offences Act 1956 S.33A as added by the Sexual Offences Act 1967

Keeping a brothel for prostitution

Sexual Offences Act 1956 S.34

Letting premises for use as a brothel

Sexual Offences Act 1956 S.34

Letting premises for use as a brothel for homosexual practices

Sexual Offences Act 1956 S.35

Tenant permitting premises to be used as a brothel

Sexual Offences Act 1956 S.35 as amended by the Sexual Offences Act 2003 S.53

Tenant permitting premises to be used as a brothel for homosexual practices

Sexual Offences Act 1956 S.33 as amended by the Sexual Offences Act 1967

Keeping a brothel for homosexual practices

Control of prostitution:

Sexual Offences Act 2001 S.53

Controlling prostitution for gain

Source:

Justice Statistics Analytical Services—Ministry of Justice



The correct answer should have been:

Crispin Blunt Portrait Mr Blunt
- Hansard - -

The number of defendants found guilty at all courts for selected prostitution related offences in the Metropolitan police force area for the years 2008 to 2009 can be viewed in the table.

Information at borough level is not collated centrally by the Ministry of Justice.

Court proceedings data for 2010 are planned for publication in the spring.

Number of defendants found guilty at all courts for selected prostitution related offences in the Metropolitan police force area for the years 2008-091,2,3

Offence

2008

2009

Kerb crawling

165

117

Soliciting for the purposes of prostitution in a public place

114

65

Keeping a brothel

11

15

Control of prostitution

16

4

1The figures given in the table on court proceedings relate to persons for whom these offences were the principal offences for which they were dealt with. When a defendant has been found guilty of two or more offences it is the offence for which the heaviest penalty is imposed. Where the same disposal is imposed for two or more offences, the offence selected is the offence for which the statutory maximum penalty is the most severe.

2 Every effort is made to ensure that the figures presented are accurate and complete. However, it is important to note that these data have been extracted from large administrative data systems generated by the courts and police forces. As a consequence, care should be taken to ensure data collection processes and their inevitable limitations are taken into account when those data are used.

3 Includes the following statutes and corresponding offence descriptions:

Kerb crawling:

Sexual Offences Act 1985, s.1

Kerb crawling

Sexual Offences Act 1985, s.2

Persistent soliciting of person or persons for the purpose of prostitution

Soliciting for the purposes of prostitution in a public place:

Sexual Offences Act 1985, s.1

Common prostitute loitering or soliciting for the purpose of prostitution

Keeping a brothel:

Sexual Offences Act 1956 s.33A as added by the Sexual Offences Act 2003 s.55

Keeping a brothel for prostitution

Sexual Offences Act 1956 s.33

Keeping a brothel

Sexual Offences Act 1956 s.34

Letting premises for use as a brothel

Sexual Offences Act 1956 s.35

Tenant permitting premises to be used as a brothel

Sexual Offences Act 1956 s.36

Tenant permitting premises to be used for prostitution

Sexual Offences Act 1956 s.33 as amended by the Sexual Offences Act 1967

Keeping a brothel for homosexual practices

Sexual Offences Act 1956 s.34

Letting premises for use as a brothel for homosexual practices

Sexual Offences Act 1956 s.35 as amended by the Sexual Offences Act 2003 s.53

Tenant permitting premises to be used as a brothel for homosexual practices

Similar provisions in Local Acts

Other offences against keeping a brothel

Control of prostitution:

Sexual Offences Act 2001 s.53

Controlling prostitution for gain

Source:

Justice Statistics Analytical Services—Ministry of Justice.