Oral Answers to Questions

Clive Betts Excerpts
Thursday 22nd April 2021

(2 years, 12 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Alex Cunningham Portrait Alex Cunningham (Stockton North) (Lab)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

What discussions he has had with the Home Secretary on reducing dog thefts.

Clive Betts Portrait Mr Clive Betts (Sheffield South East) (Lab)
- Hansard - -

What discussions he has had with the Home Secretary on reducing dog thefts.

George Eustice Portrait The Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (George Eustice)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I recently met the Home Secretary and the Lord Chancellor in March to discuss the important issue of pet theft. As a result of that meeting, officials from across the three Departments have been tasked with developing solutions that tackle this issue effectively. The work of the pet theft taskforce has already begun, with officials drawing together available data and evidence.

--- Later in debate ---
Clive Betts Portrait Mr Betts [V]
- Hansard - -

I am sure the Secretary of State recognises that for those committing the theft it may be a financial issue, but for those who have their pets stolen this is really a loss of a valued member of their family. I give credit to The Star newspaper in Sheffield, which has highlighted a growing number of these incidents, and the heartbreak and anguish it causes people to lose their valued pet. Will the Secretary of State accept that this is a different sort of crime to the normal theft of a possession, and that, as such, it needs a different, specific offence with specific and tougher penalties enacted for those who commit it?

George Eustice Portrait George Eustice
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

It is a different type of offence in that there is emotional stress on the owner of the pet, but there can also be stress and effects on the welfare of the animal. That is why, in the current sentencing guidelines, the courts can take account of an aggravated offence with emotional distress, and the maximum penalty could be as high as seven years. We have asked the pet theft taskforce to look at this issue more closely and assemble the evidence to consider whether anything further is required.