Security Vetting Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate
Department: Cabinet Office

Security Vetting

Claire Young Excerpts
Monday 20th April 2026

(1 day, 8 hours ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Watch Debate Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Claire Young Portrait Claire Young (Thornbury and Yate) (LD)
- View Speech - Hansard - -

To override the outcome of the developed vetting process, the FCDO must have been under pressure from someone. Ditching a tried and tested ambassador for a high-risk one seems odd behaviour for a Prime Minister who claims to be so fond of proper process. Whose idea was it, and who was applying the pressure?

Keir Starmer Portrait The Prime Minister
- View Speech - Hansard - - - Excerpts

I reject the idea that any pressure is a good reason not to disclose to the Prime Minister that UKSV recommended against clearance for a very senior, sensitive appointment. I simply do not accept that that is an adequate reason, whatever the pressure.