Information between 19th October 2025 - 29th October 2025
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.
| Division Votes |
|---|
|
20 Oct 2025 - Diego Garcia Military Base and British Indian Ocean Territory Bill - View Vote Context Claire Coutinho voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 95 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 174 Noes - 321 |
|
20 Oct 2025 - Diego Garcia Military Base and British Indian Ocean Territory Bill - View Vote Context Claire Coutinho voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 95 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 320 Noes - 171 |
|
20 Oct 2025 - Diego Garcia Military Base and British Indian Ocean Territory Bill - View Vote Context Claire Coutinho voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 94 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 172 Noes - 322 |
|
20 Oct 2025 - Diego Garcia Military Base and British Indian Ocean Territory Bill - View Vote Context Claire Coutinho voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 93 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 318 Noes - 174 |
|
21 Oct 2025 - Sentencing Bill - View Vote Context Claire Coutinho voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 89 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 104 Noes - 317 |
|
21 Oct 2025 - Sentencing Bill - View Vote Context Claire Coutinho voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 89 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 105 Noes - 381 |
|
21 Oct 2025 - Sentencing Bill - View Vote Context Claire Coutinho voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 88 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 182 Noes - 307 |
|
21 Oct 2025 - Sentencing Bill - View Vote Context Claire Coutinho voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 88 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 167 Noes - 313 |
|
21 Oct 2025 - Sentencing Bill - View Vote Context Claire Coutinho voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 89 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 389 Noes - 102 |
|
21 Oct 2025 - Sentencing Bill - View Vote Context Claire Coutinho voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 85 Conservative No votes vs 1 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 77 Noes - 390 |
|
28 Oct 2025 - China Spying Case - View Vote Context Claire Coutinho voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 90 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 174 Noes - 327 |
|
28 Oct 2025 - Stamp Duty Land Tax - View Vote Context Claire Coutinho voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 95 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 103 Noes - 329 |
|
27 Oct 2025 - Victims and Courts Bill - View Vote Context Claire Coutinho voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 79 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 152 Noes - 337 |
|
27 Oct 2025 - Victims and Courts Bill - View Vote Context Claire Coutinho voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 82 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 165 Noes - 323 |
|
27 Oct 2025 - Victims and Courts Bill - View Vote Context Claire Coutinho voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 79 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 153 Noes - 332 |
|
27 Oct 2025 - Victims and Courts Bill - View Vote Context Claire Coutinho voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 83 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 166 Noes - 322 |
| Written Answers |
|---|
|
Nursing and Midwifery Council: Complaints
Asked by: Claire Coutinho (Conservative - East Surrey) Monday 20th October 2025 Question to the Department of Health and Social Care: To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, what the average length of time taken is for the Nursing and Midwifery Council to resolve a disciplinary complaint. Answered by Karin Smyth - Minister of State (Department of Health and Social Care) The Department does not hold this information centrally. The Nursing and Midwifery Council (NMC) is the independent regulator of nurses and midwives in the United Kingdom, and nursing associates in England. The UK's model of healthcare professional regulation is founded on the principle of regulators operating independently from the Government. All registered health and social care professions in the UK pay an annual registration fee to their regulatory body. Registrant fees are used to fund the NMC's operations, including its fitness to practise processes. Being funded by registrant fees enables the NMC to maintain its independence, allowing it to take action if it identifies risks to patient safety or the public’s confidence in the profession. |
|
Nursing and Midwifery Council: Disciplinary Proceedings
Asked by: Claire Coutinho (Conservative - East Surrey) Monday 20th October 2025 Question to the Department of Health and Social Care: To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, how many hours of staff time are taken up by the average Nursing and Midwifery Council disciplinary process. Answered by Karin Smyth - Minister of State (Department of Health and Social Care) The Department does not hold this information centrally. The Nursing and Midwifery Council (NMC) is the independent regulator of nurses and midwives in the United Kingdom, and nursing associates in England. The UK's model of healthcare professional regulation is founded on the principle of regulators operating independently from the Government. All registered health and social care professions in the UK pay an annual registration fee to their regulatory body. Registrant fees are used to fund the NMC's operations, including its fitness to practise processes. Being funded by registrant fees enables the NMC to maintain its independence, allowing it to take action if it identifies risks to patient safety or the public’s confidence in the profession. |
|
Nursing and Midwifery Council: Disciplinary Proceedings
Asked by: Claire Coutinho (Conservative - East Surrey) Monday 20th October 2025 Question to the Department of Health and Social Care: To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, what the average cost to the public purse is of a Nursing and Midwifery Council disciplinary process. Answered by Karin Smyth - Minister of State (Department of Health and Social Care) The Department does not hold this information centrally. The Nursing and Midwifery Council (NMC) is the independent regulator of nurses and midwives in the United Kingdom, and nursing associates in England. The UK's model of healthcare professional regulation is founded on the principle of regulators operating independently from the Government. All registered health and social care professions in the UK pay an annual registration fee to their regulatory body. Registrant fees are used to fund the NMC's operations, including its fitness to practise processes. Being funded by registrant fees enables the NMC to maintain its independence, allowing it to take action if it identifies risks to patient safety or the public’s confidence in the profession. |