Debates between Christopher Pincher and John Howell during the 2019 Parliament

Thu 11th Jun 2020

Planning Process: Probity

Debate between Christopher Pincher and John Howell
Thursday 11th June 2020

(3 years, 10 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts

Urgent Questions are proposed each morning by backbench MPs, and up to two may be selected each day by the Speaker. Chosen Urgent Questions are announced 30 minutes before Parliament sits each day.

Each Urgent Question requires a Government Minister to give a response on the debate topic.

This information is provided by Parallel Parliament and does not comprise part of the offical record

Christopher Pincher Portrait Christopher Pincher
- Hansard - -

The planning law in this country is very clear, as the hon. Lady knows. I suggest that she go and read it.

John Howell Portrait John Howell (Henley) (Con)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

Does my right hon. Friend agree that the probity of the planning system has been enhanced by the Secretary of State’s decision to proceed with South Oxfordshire District Council’s local plan and that the holding of an examination in public online is a very good, transparent way of proceeding?

Christopher Pincher Portrait Christopher Pincher
- Hansard - -

Virtual proceedings are an effective way of ensuring that the light of public interest shines upon planning decisions, and I think the decision made in respect of South Oxfordshire was the right one. As I have said before, we will act always with fairness and probity, but we will also act to make sure that the Government’s objectives to build more homes in the right places—the sorts of homes people want and need—are met.