Information between 20th October 2025 - 9th November 2025
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.
| Division Votes |
|---|
|
20 Oct 2025 - Diego Garcia Military Base and British Indian Ocean Territory Bill - View Vote Context Christopher Chope voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 94 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 172 Noes - 322 |
|
20 Oct 2025 - Diego Garcia Military Base and British Indian Ocean Territory Bill - View Vote Context Christopher Chope voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 95 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 320 Noes - 171 |
|
20 Oct 2025 - Diego Garcia Military Base and British Indian Ocean Territory Bill - View Vote Context Christopher Chope voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 93 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 318 Noes - 174 |
|
21 Oct 2025 - Sentencing Bill - View Vote Context Christopher Chope voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 89 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 104 Noes - 317 |
|
21 Oct 2025 - Sentencing Bill - View Vote Context Christopher Chope voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 85 Conservative No votes vs 1 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 77 Noes - 390 |
|
21 Oct 2025 - Sentencing Bill - View Vote Context Christopher Chope voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 89 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 105 Noes - 381 |
|
21 Oct 2025 - Sentencing Bill - View Vote Context Christopher Chope voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 88 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 182 Noes - 307 |
|
21 Oct 2025 - Sentencing Bill - View Vote Context Christopher Chope voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 88 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 167 Noes - 313 |
|
21 Oct 2025 - Sentencing Bill - View Vote Context Christopher Chope voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 89 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 389 Noes - 102 |
|
28 Oct 2025 - China Spying Case - View Vote Context Christopher Chope voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 90 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 174 Noes - 327 |
|
28 Oct 2025 - Stamp Duty Land Tax - View Vote Context Christopher Chope voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 95 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 103 Noes - 329 |
|
29 Oct 2025 - Sentencing Bill - View Vote Context Christopher Chope voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 1 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 82 Noes - 314 |
|
29 Oct 2025 - Sentencing Bill - View Vote Context Christopher Chope voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 94 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 321 Noes - 103 |
|
29 Oct 2025 - Sentencing Bill - View Vote Context Christopher Chope voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 95 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 173 Noes - 323 |
|
29 Oct 2025 - Sentencing Bill - View Vote Context Christopher Chope voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 97 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 170 Noes - 328 |
|
29 Oct 2025 - European Convention on Human Rights (Withdrawal) - View Vote Context Christopher Chope voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 87 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 96 Noes - 154 |
|
29 Oct 2025 - Sentencing Bill - View Vote Context Christopher Chope voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 96 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 182 Noes - 311 |
|
27 Oct 2025 - Victims and Courts Bill - View Vote Context Christopher Chope voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 79 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 153 Noes - 332 |
|
27 Oct 2025 - Victims and Courts Bill - View Vote Context Christopher Chope voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 79 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 152 Noes - 337 |
|
27 Oct 2025 - Victims and Courts Bill - View Vote Context Christopher Chope voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 83 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 166 Noes - 322 |
|
4 Nov 2025 - Supporting High Streets - View Vote Context Christopher Chope voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 96 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 106 Noes - 321 |
|
4 Nov 2025 - Welfare Spending - View Vote Context Christopher Chope voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 90 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 92 Noes - 403 |
| Written Answers | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Immigration: Appeals
Asked by: Christopher Chope (Conservative - Christchurch) Monday 27th October 2025 Question to the Ministry of Justice: To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, in how many cases before the (a) First-Tier Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum) and (b) Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) has the applicant been in receipt of legal aid in the last 12 months for which information is available. Answered by Sarah Sackman - Minister of State (Ministry of Justice) The information requested is not held centrally. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
All-party Parliamentary Group for Energy Studies
Asked by: Christopher Chope (Conservative - Christchurch) Monday 27th October 2025 Question to the Department for Energy Security & Net Zero: To ask the Secretary of State for Energy Security and Net Zero, when he received an invitation to speak at the annual dinner of the Parliamentary Group for Energy Studies on 21 October 2025; what his response was; and when he sent his response. Answered by Michael Shanks - Minister of State (Department for Energy Security and Net Zero) My Rt. Hon. Friend the Secretary of State for Energy Security and Net Zero receives a high volume of invitations to events and is therefore not able to accommodate all requests. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Vaccine Damage Payment Scheme: Coronavirus
Asked by: Christopher Chope (Conservative - Christchurch) Monday 27th October 2025 Question to the Department of Health and Social Care: To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, with reference to the oral contribution by the Minister for Secondary Care on 3 September 2025, Official Report, column 107WH, whether the Minister for Public Health and Women's Health plans to meet the hon. Member for Christchurch. Answered by Ashley Dalton - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department of Health and Social Care) This is an issue that the Government takes very seriously. A meeting has been scheduled with the hon. Member for Christchurch. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Immigration: Appeals
Asked by: Christopher Chope (Conservative - Christchurch) Monday 27th October 2025 Question to the Ministry of Justice: To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, how many appeals heard at the First-Tier Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum) were on the grounds that removal of the appellant from the UK would breach the UK’s obligations under the Refugee Convention in each of the last 12 months for which figures are available; and how many of those appeals were successful in each of those months. Answered by Sarah Sackman - Minister of State (Ministry of Justice) The number of asylum, protection and revocation of protection appeals (those lodged on grounds relating to breach of the UK’s Refugee Convention obligations) determined by the Immigration and Asylum Chamber of the First-tier Tribunal and the number of those that were successful and allowed by the Tribunal can be found in the following table: Table 1. First-tier Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) - Number of appeals determined at hearing or on paper for Asylum/Protection/Revocation of Protection(1), April 2024 to March 2025(2)
The table shows the latest 12 months of available data. Published statistics can be found at: https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/tribunals-statistics-quarterly-january-to-march-2025. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Immigration: Appeals
Asked by: Christopher Chope (Conservative - Christchurch) Monday 27th October 2025 Question to the Ministry of Justice: To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, how many appeals heard at the First-Tier Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum) were on the grounds that removal of the appellant from the UK was unlawful under the Human Rights Act 1998 in each of the last 12 months for which figures are available; and how many of those appeals were successful in each of those months. Answered by Sarah Sackman - Minister of State (Ministry of Justice) The number of human rights appeals (those lodged on human rights grounds) determined by the Immigration and Asylum Chamber of the First-tier Tribunal and the number of those that were successful and allowed by the Tribunal can be found in the following table: Table 1. First-tier Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) - Number of appeals determined at hearing or on paper for Human Rights Appeals, April 2024 to March 2025(1)
The table shows the latest 12 months of available data. Published statistics can be found at: https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/tribunals-statistics-quarterly-january-to-march-2025. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Repossession Orders
Asked by: Christopher Chope (Conservative - Christchurch) Tuesday 28th October 2025 Question to the Ministry of Justice: To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, if he will make it his policy that requests by district judges to transfer up to the High Court for enforcement should always be allowed (a) where the County Court bailiff delay locally is three months or more and (b) where it is possible that reasonable force may have to be used. Answered by Sarah Sackman - Minister of State (Ministry of Justice) The Government has noted the findings of the High Court Enforcement Officer Association’s recent report about the process for transferring possession cases to the High Court for enforcement by High Court Enforcement Officers and is considering its recommendations. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Repossession Orders
Asked by: Christopher Chope (Conservative - Christchurch) Tuesday 28th October 2025 Question to the Ministry of Justice: To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, what assessment he has made of the potential implications for his policies of the High Court Enforcement Officers Association's report entitled Possessions - Transferring Up, published in October 2025. Answered by Sarah Sackman - Minister of State (Ministry of Justice) The Government has noted the findings of the High Court Enforcement Officer Association’s recent report about the process for transferring possession cases to the High Court for enforcement by High Court Enforcement Officers and is considering its recommendations. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Immigrataion: Appeals
Asked by: Christopher Chope (Conservative - Christchurch) Tuesday 4th November 2025 Question to the Home Office: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, what steps she is taking to improve decision-making by her Department in the context of the number of successful appeals under the Human Rights Act 1998 upheld by the First-tier Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber). Answered by Alex Norris - Minister of State (Home Office) The Home Office publishes data on asylum in the ‘Immigration System Statistics Quarterly Release’. Data on initial decisions and outcomes on asylum claims, is published in table Asy_D02 of the ‘Asylum claim and initial decisions detailed datasets’. The latest data relates to as at 30 June 2025. Data for as at 30 September 2025 will be published on 27 November 2025. Data on asylum appeals is published in table Asy_D06 and Asy_D07 of the ‘Asylum appeals lodged and determined detailed datasets’. The latest data relates to the year ending March 2023.
Information on how to use the datasets can be found in the ‘Notes’ page of the workbooks. Appeals data from April 2023 onwards is currently unavailable for publication due to ongoing work as immigration data transitions to a new caseworking system. Work is ongoing to make this information available, and it will be included in a future edition of the Immigration System Statistics release.
Please note that figures for immigration and asylum appeals at First-Tier Tribunal and subsequent stages are published by the Ministry of Justice as part of their Tribunal Statistics release. The latest data relates to January to March 2025. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Immigration: Appeals
Asked by: Christopher Chope (Conservative - Christchurch) Wednesday 5th November 2025 Question to the Ministry of Justice: To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, how many courts hear First-tier Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum) appeals; and how many are fully funded to operate throughout the year. Answered by Sarah Sackman - Minister of State (Ministry of Justice) The First-tier Tribunal Immigration and Asylum Chamber (FtTIAC) has 83 tribunal hearing rooms across the United Kingdom and has access to shared court rooms in other jurisdictions. Utilisation of this space is dependent on a number of factors including the volume of ‘in person’ versus ‘remote’ hearings scheduled, budgetary allocations, the requirement for judges to sit at satellite venues and available staffing and judicial resource. The FtTIAC is currently funded to sit to maximum levels based on available judicial capacity. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Hospital Beds: Dorset
Asked by: Christopher Chope (Conservative - Christchurch) Wednesday 5th November 2025 Question to the Department of Health and Social Care: To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, how many beds at University Hospitals Dorset were occupied on (a) 1 April and (b) 1 October 2025 by patients with no criteria to reside. Answered by Zubir Ahmed - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department of Health and Social Care) The Department of Health and Social Care has indicated that it will not be possible to answer this question within the usual time period. An answer is being prepared and will be provided as soon as it is available. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Vaccine Damage Payment Scheme: Coronavirus
Asked by: Christopher Chope (Conservative - Christchurch) Tuesday 28th October 2025 Question to the Department of Health and Social Care: To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, how many claims to the Vaccine Damage Payment Scheme for damage caused by covid-19 vaccines were received between 1 April and 30 September 2025; how many awards were made to claimants in that period; how many claims were rejected (a) through lack of causation and (b) because they were below the disability threshold; how many claims remained outstanding on 30 September 2025; and how many of those claims have been outstanding for over 12 months. Answered by Ashley Dalton - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department of Health and Social Care) My deepest sympathies are with those who have experienced harm following vaccination and to their families. Data from the NHS Business Services Authority, the administrator of the Vaccine Damage Payment Scheme, shows that during the period of 1 April 2025 to 30 September 2025:
As of 30 September 2025, there were 4,882 total COVID-19 claims that were unresolved, 1,672 of which had been so for over 12 months. Information on COVID-19 claims to the Vaccine Damage Payment Scheme is published on a quarterly basis by the NHS Business Service Authority. Further information is available at the following link: https://opendata.nhsbsa.net/dataset/vdps-covid-19 I recognise many of the concerns that have been raised regarding the Vaccine Damage Payment Scheme. This input will shape our ongoing consideration of reforms to the scheme and I will keep Parliament updated, as appropriate. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Vaccine Damage Payment Scheme: Coronavirus
Asked by: Christopher Chope (Conservative - Christchurch) Tuesday 28th October 2025 Question to the Department of Health and Social Care: To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, pursuant to the Answer of 5 March 2025 to Question 33850 on Vaccine Damage Payment Scheme: Coronavirus, how many of the 69 cases referred to the First-Tier Tribunal were (a) successful and (b) rejected; and how many have been outstanding for more than (i) three and (ii) six months. Answered by Ashley Dalton - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department of Health and Social Care) Data from the NHS Business Services Authority (NHSBSA), which administers the Vaccine Damage Payment Scheme, shows that of the 69 claims identified in Question 33850:
Appeals to the First-Tier Tribunal are managed by the HM Courts and Tribunals Service, and therefore the NHSBSA must follow the directions and timescales specified by the HM Courts and Tribunals Service. The data is based on the date the HM Courts and Tribunals Service notified the NHSBSA of an appeal. The NHSBSA is not always provided the date the appellant made the appeal application to the HM Courts and Tribunals Service. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Immigration: Appeals
Asked by: Christopher Chope (Conservative - Christchurch) Monday 3rd November 2025 Question to the Home Office: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, how many decisions of the Home Office with a right of appeal to the First-tier Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum) have been made in each of the last 12 months; and how many of these have been or are now the subject of such an appeal. Answered by Alex Norris - Minister of State (Home Office) The Home Office publishes data on asylum in the ‘Immigration System Statistics Quarterly Release’. Data on initial decisions and outcomes on asylum claims, is published in table Asy_D02 of the ‘Asylum claim and initial decisions detailed datasets’. The latest data relates to as at 30 June 2025. Data for as at 30 September 2025 will be published on 27 November 2025. Data on asylum appeals is published in table Asy_D06 and Asy_D07 of the ‘Asylum appeals lodged and determined detailed datasets’. The latest data relates to the year ending March 2023.
Information on how to use the datasets can be found in the ‘Notes’ page of the workbooks. Appeals data from April 2023 onwards is currently unavailable for publication due to ongoing work as immigration data transitions to a new caseworking system. Work is ongoing to make this information available, and it will be included in a future edition of the Immigration System Statistics release.
Please note that figures for immigration and asylum appeals at First-Tier Tribunal and subsequent stages are published by the Ministry of Justice as part of their Tribunal Statistics release. The latest data relates to January to March 2025. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Immigration: Appeals
Asked by: Christopher Chope (Conservative - Christchurch) Monday 3rd November 2025 Question to the Ministry of Justice: To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, how many appeals to the First-tier Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum) were outstanding on 30 September (a) 2025, (b) 2024 and (c) 2023. Answered by Sarah Sackman - Minister of State (Ministry of Justice) The number of open cases in the First-tier Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) is published in table FIA4 of the Tribunals Statistics quarterly tables and more recently monthly data in table 3 of the HMCTS management information. Figures covering up to September 2025 are scheduled for publication on 11 December 2025. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Immigration: Appeals
Asked by: Christopher Chope (Conservative - Christchurch) Monday 3rd November 2025 Question to the Ministry of Justice: To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, for what reason is the First-tier Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum) at Taylor House Tribunal Hearing Centre on Rosebery Avenue, London, is restricted from using more than 20 of its 27 courts on average during the year; and what would be the additional cost of allowing all of its 27 courts to be used. Answered by Sarah Sackman - Minister of State (Ministry of Justice) The First-tier Tribunal Immigration and Asylum Chamber (FtTIAC) is currently sitting to maximum levels possible based on available judicial capacity. The FtTIAC has 27 hearing rooms available to list into at the Taylor House Tribunal Hearing Centre. Utilisation of this space is dependent on a number of factors including the volume of ‘in person’ versus ‘remote’ hearings scheduled, budgetary allocations, the requirement for judges to sit at satellite venues and available staffing and judicial resource. Work is ongoing to increase capacity through recruitment of Judges and support staff. Judicial recruitment exercises which commenced in 2024 for the First-tier Tribunal, including the IAC, are ongoing with appointments due later this year and we are working to grow capacity further across future years. As additional Judges begin to sit we expect to see higher levels of listing across the FtTIAC estate. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Immigration: Appeals
Asked by: Christopher Chope (Conservative - Christchurch) Monday 3rd November 2025 Question to the Ministry of Justice: To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, if he will make his policy that witnesses giving evidence at hearings of the First-tier Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum) should do so under oath. Answered by Sarah Sackman - Minister of State (Ministry of Justice) As an issue of tribunal procedure, giving evidence under oath would be a matter for judicial consideration. Rule 14(3) of the Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) already provides that the tribunal may require evidence to be given under oath. Additionally, a witness statement, the equivalent of the oral evidence which the witness would, if called, give in evidence must always include a statement by the intended witness in their own language that they believe the facts in it are true. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
All-party Parliamentary Group for Energy Studies
Asked by: Christopher Chope (Conservative - Christchurch) Tuesday 4th November 2025 Question to the Department for Energy Security & Net Zero: To ask the Secretary of State for Energy Security and Net Zero, pursuant to the Answer on 27 October 2025 to Question 84141 on All-party Parliamentary Group for Energy Studies, how many invitations he received for speaking events in (a) August, (b) September and (c) October 2025; and how many of those invitations were (i) answered within (A) one month and (B) two months and (ii) not answered. Answered by Michael Shanks - Minister of State (Department for Energy Security and Net Zero) As I notified the hon. Member in my Answer on 27 October 2025 to Question 84141, my Rt. Hon. Friend the Secretary of State for Energy Security and Net Zero receives a high volume of invitations to events and is not able to accommodate all requests. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Undocumented Migrants: Deportation
Asked by: Christopher Chope (Conservative - Christchurch) Tuesday 4th November 2025 Question to the Home Office: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, (a) how many and (b) what value of facilitation payments were made to people subject to (i) deportation and (ii) removal in each of the last 12 months for which figures are available. Answered by Alex Norris - Minister of State (Home Office) The information requested regarding the specific value of payments made under the Voluntary Returns Service (VRS) and Facilitated Return Scheme (FRS) are not separately available from published statistics.
The Home Office publishes all available information on returns expenditure in the Home Office Annual Report and accounts at Home Office annual reports and accounts - GOV.UK(opens in a new tab)(opens in a new tab).
The number of foreign national offenders returned under FRS is published as part of the Immigration Enforcement quarterly release, with the latest publication being in 2022. The latest published data on FRS returns can be viewed at: Immigration Enforcement data: Q2 2024 - GOV.UK.
Whereas the number of foreign nationals returned under the VRS is published as part of the Immigration system statistics return summary tables, with the latest publication being for Q2 2025. The latest published data on VRS returns can be viewed at: Immigration system statistics data tables - GOV.UK.
FRS and VRS are not an alternative to removal or deportation but facilitate the early removal of FNOs and those without leave to remain in the UK, helping them to re-settle in their country of origin. Voluntary removals benefit the UK taxpayer as costs of detention, appeals, and other legal challenges are significantly reduced. |
| Live Transcript |
|---|
|
Note: Cited speaker in live transcript data may not always be accurate. Check video link to confirm. |
|
24 Oct 2025, 11:10 a.m. - House of Lords "Christopher Chope MP, who is notable for his interventions on private bills, Private Members' " Baroness Taylor of Stevenage, Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Housing, Communities and Local Government) (Labour) - View Video - View Transcript |
| Parliamentary Debates |
|---|
|
GP practice in Burton, Dorset
0 speeches (None words) Monday 27th October 2025 - Petitions Mentions: 1: None —[Presented by Sir Christopher Chope, Official Report, 2 September 2025; Vol. 772, c. 261.] - Link to Speech |
| Select Committee Documents |
|---|
|
Wednesday 5th November 2025
Oral Evidence - Centenary Action, and Hansard Society Call lists - Procedure Committee Found: Watch the meeting Members present: Cat Smith (Chair); James Asser; Bambos Charalambous; Sir Christopher Chope |
|
Wednesday 5th November 2025
Oral Evidence - Scottish National Party Call lists - Procedure Committee Found: Watch the meeting Members present: Cat Smith (Chair); James Asser; Bambos Charalambous; Sir Christopher Chope |
|
Wednesday 29th October 2025
Oral Evidence - House of Commons, House of Commons, House of Commons, House of Commons, and House of Commons Sub judice resolution in the House of Commons - Procedure Committee Found: Watch the meeting Members present: Cat Smith (Chair); James Asser; Bambos Charalambous; Sir Christopher Chope |
|
Wednesday 29th October 2025
Report - 5th Report - Tackling the energy cost crisis Energy Security and Net Zero Committee Found: —(Sir Christopher Chope.) Question put, That the Amendment be made. |
|
Friday 24th October 2025
Report - 4th Report - The new National Policy Statement for nuclear energy generation Energy Security and Net Zero Committee Found: Bill Esterson (Labour; Sefton Central) (Chair) Ms Polly Billington (Labour; East Thanet) Sir Christopher Chope |
|
Thursday 23rd October 2025
Special Report - 4th Special Report – Status of independent Members of Parliament: Government and House Administration Responses Procedure Committee Found: Baines (Labour; St Helens North) Bambos Charalambous (Labour; Southgate and Wood Green) Sir Christopher Chope |
|
Wednesday 22nd October 2025
Oral Evidence - Professor Meg Russell, Director at UCL Constitution Unit, Dr Marc Geddes, Senior Lecturer in Politics at University of Edinburgh, and Dr Stephen Holden Bates, Senior Lecturer in Political Science at University of Birmingham Elections within the House of Commons - Procedure Committee Found: Watch the meeting Members present: Cat Smith (Chair); James Asser; Sir Christopher Chope; Mary Kelly |
| Deposited Papers |
|---|
|
Tuesday 4th November 2025
Department for Work and Pensions Source Page: Letter dated 24/10/2025 from Torsten Bell MP to Christopher Chope MP, Emma Lewell MP, Esther McVey MP, Karl Turner MP, Dawn Butler MP regarding the Pension Schemes Bill: clarification of remarks made during committee proceedings. 3p. Document: Letter_to_PSB_Public_Bill_Committee.pdf (PDF) Found: Letter dated 24/10/2025 from Torsten Bell MP to Christopher Chope MP, Emma Lewell MP, Esther McVey MP |
| Calendar |
|---|
|
Wednesday 29th October 2025 2:30 p.m. Energy Security and Net Zero Committee - Oral evidence Subject: UK refineries and the role of oil and gas At 3:00pm: Oral evidence Elizabeth de Jong - CEO at Fuels Industry UK Benj Sykes - Head of Ørsted UK at Ørsted UK Paul Greenwood - UK Chair at ExxonMobil At 4:00pm: Oral evidence Stuart Payne - Chief Executive at North Sea Transition Authority Katy Heidenreich - Supply Chain & People Director at Offshore Energies UK Harriet Eisner - Regional Co-Ordinating Officer at Unite View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Wednesday 29th October 2025 2:30 p.m. Procedure Committee - Oral evidence Subject: Sub judice resolution in the House of Commons At 2:45pm: Oral evidence Tom Goldsmith - Clerk of the House at House of Commons Tom Healey, Clerk of Legislation, House of Commons - Clerk of Legislation at House of Commons Eve Samson - Clerk of the Journals at House of Commons Dr Farrah Bhatti - Principal Clerk, Table Office at House of Commons Saira Salimi - Speaker's Counsel at House of Commons View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Wednesday 12th November 2025 2:30 p.m. Energy Security and Net Zero Committee - Oral evidence Subject: Unlocking community energy at scale At 3:00pm: Oral evidence Councillor Emily O'Brien - Climate Change Cabinet member at Lewes District Council and UK100 Climate Leadership Academy Graduate Tanuja Pandit - CEO at Power Up North London Eleanor Radcliffe - Project Manager, Energy Commons Team at Carbon Co-op At 4:00pm: Oral evidence Robbie Calvert - Head of Policy and Public Affairs at Royal Town Planning Institute (RTPI) Dan Stone - Policy and Influencing Officer at Centre for Sustainable Energy Jenny Wigley, KC - Planning Barrister at Landmark Chambers View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Wednesday 12th November 2025 2:30 p.m. Procedure Committee - Oral evidence Subject: Sub judice resolution in the House of Commons At 2:45pm: Oral evidence Rt. Hon. Dominic Grieve KC - former Attorney General Rt. Hon. Sir Michael Ellis KBE, KC - former Attorney General Rt Hon Sir Jeremy Wright KC MP - former Attorney General View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Wednesday 5th November 2025 2:30 p.m. Procedure Committee - Oral evidence Subject: Call lists At 2:45pm: Oral evidence Kirsty Blackman MP - Chief Whip at Scottish National Party At 3:15pm: Oral evidence Dr Ruth Fox - Director at Hansard Society Dr Sarabajaya Kumar - Steering group member at Centenary Action View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Wednesday 19th November 2025 2:30 p.m. Procedure Committee - Oral evidence Subject: Elections within the House of Commons At 2:45pm: Oral evidence Peter Stanyon, Chief Executive, Association of Electoral Administrators View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Tuesday 16th December 2025 11:30 a.m. Modernisation Committee - Private Meeting View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Tuesday 2nd December 2025 11:30 a.m. Modernisation Committee - Private Meeting View calendar - Add to calendar |
| Select Committee Inquiry |
|---|
|
30 Oct 2025
Managing the future of UK oil and gas Energy Security and Net Zero Committee (Select) Submit Evidence (by 7 Jan 2026) Following an initial evidence session in Parliament on the role of the UK’s refinery industry in the energy transition, the Committee is launching a new inquiry and call for evidence on the future of UK oil and gas. Data from the oil and gas industry shows that it directly supports around 26,000 jobs across the UK and indirectly supports 95,000 more – through offshore drilling, rigging, catering and scaffolding, and onshore fabrication yards, anchor manufacturing, vessel maintenance and more. There are an estimated, further 84,000 jobs for hospitality workers and taxi drivers that serve these industrial communities. The UK has of course experienced previous energy and industrial transitions with the closure of its coal mines in the 1980s, and more recently the closure of major steel manufacturing works. The harsh experience of deindustrialisation has raised concerns that large, skilled workforces may bear the brunt of moving away from fossil fuels. The successful redeployment of the workforce at the UK’s last coal power plant Ratcliffe may prove difficult to replicate for the sector-wide transition away from oil & gas. Yet a key element in delivering the energy transition will be to ensure that the benefits from existing fossil fuel extraction can be utilised in establishing the industry that will replace it. In the initial session in Parliament on October 29, witnesses from the industry highlighted the need to address the oil and gas industry’s fiscal environment. They reinforced the Scottish Affairs Committee’s conclusion that there needs to be a revision to the Energy Profits Levy where “a lack of clarity on the fiscal regime beyond 2030 has created uncertainty for industry in the North Sea. The Energy Profits Levy at its current rate of 38%, which brings the headline rate of tax to 78%, is seen by many in industry as no longer proportionate”. The Committee also heard a further call to ensure that refineries were included in the Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism, so they could compete on a level playing field with foreign based competitors in what is a global market. The Committee is now launching a full inquiry into the role of oil and gas in the energy transition, the management of the UK’s North Sea energy basin and how the transition away from gas in home heating might be achieved. It will aim to:
|
|
5 Nov 2025
International climate policy Energy Security and Net Zero Committee (Select) Submit Evidence (by 7 Jan 2026) Ahead of COP 30, where host country Brazil’s Presidency has set a strategic goal to transition from “negotiation to implementation”, the Committee is launching a call for evidence in a major new inquiry on UK climate policy and finance. Climate change is a global problem that requires a global response. The world is now experiencing the increasingly severe impacts of a rapidly heating climate with intense wildfires, severe droughts, and heavy rainfall leading to destructive floods more frequently and over a wider range. The 2015 Paris Agreement represented a significant moment of international coordination to reduce emissions and to adapt to climate change. But the UN recently announced that global action has failed to limit global heating to the 1.5 degrees agreed there. In 2022, the IPCC warned that “any further delay in concerted global action will miss a brief and rapidly closing window to secure a liveable future”. The UK became the first country in the world to make a legally-binding national commitment to cut greenhouse gas emissions in The Climate Change Act 2008. In 2019 the UK was the first major economy to enshrine its commitment to Net Zero by 2050 in law. At COP 29 in Baku last year, the agreed target for climate finance flowing to developing countries was increased from $100 billion to at least $300 billion a year by 2035, with an aspiration for that to hit $1.3 trillion per year over the same period, in recognition of the scale of the challenge. And in 2022, the latest data available, developed countries delivered around $116 billion – over that target - to developing countries for climate action. But the global political consensus on climate change, the financial sector’s commitment to action on climate and climate diplomacy have all been impacted by tensions and transformations in the global order. The UK Government has stated “there is no global stability without climate stability”, that the UK “must play its part by resetting at home and reconnecting abroad”, and has placed an emphasis on re-establishing the UK “as a climate leader on the global stage”. It committed to meet the previous Government’s pledge of providing £11.6 billion in international climate finance between 2021 and 2026 - but beyond March 2026 the approach is unclear. Through this inquiry, the Committee intends to investigate how the Government can best demonstrate international leadership on climate policy. |
|
17 Jul 2025
Planning for nuclear energy generation Energy Security and Net Zero Committee (Select) Not accepting submissions The UK is embarking on an ambitious programme of investment in nuclear energy, seeking to reverse decades of declining capacity. The Government is counting on new nuclear to help deliver energy security and decarbonise electricity generation. Announcing funding for the Sizewell C nuclear power plant in June, the Energy Secretary said “we need new nuclear to deliver a golden age of clean energy abundance.” But past promises of a golden age of nuclear energy have so far failed to materialise. A new reactor has not been connected to the grid for 30 years. Nuclear projects have historically faced unique barriers, including complex regulatory and planning processes. The Government now aims to deliver reforms to streamline planning approvals and give greater certainty to developers. Consultation and scrutiny of EN-7The National Policy Statement for Nuclear Energy Generation (EN-7) has been put forward to help guide planners as they seek to make decisions on siting new nuclear infrastructure. Under the Planning Act 2008, a National Policy Statement (NPS) like EN-7 must undergo public consultation and parliamentary scrutiny before it can be formally designated. EN-7 has undergone two rounds of consultation: the first focused on potential changes to the nuclear siting approach; the second introduced the full draft text. The Committee is now beginning the parliamentary scrutiny process, offering MPs the opportunity to hear from industry, experts, and the public to examine the implications of the framework set out in EN-7 in detail. What is EN-7?EN-7 is intended to become the principal guide for decisions on future nuclear power stations in England and Wales. Nuclear infrastructure proposals are currently limited to eight sites in England and Wales. EN-7 replaces this with a criteria-based approach. It is also intended to support development of a broader range of nuclear technologies like Small Modular Reactors (SMRs) and Advanced Modular Reactors (AMRs), as well as traditional gigawatt-scale plants. The aim is to create a future-proof planning framework that enables a pipeline of new nuclear projects to come forward. Call for EvidenceThe Energy Security and Net Zero Committee is now inviting written submissions to help assess whether EN-7 provides a coherent and effective framework for enabling the UK’s nuclear ambitions. |