Information between 9th November 2025 - 29th November 2025
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.
| Division Votes |
|---|
|
12 Nov 2025 - Taxes - View Vote Context Christopher Chope voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 94 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 101 Noes - 316 |
|
12 Nov 2025 - Energy - View Vote Context Christopher Chope voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 94 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 97 Noes - 336 |
|
13 Nov 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context Christopher Chope voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 72 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 244 Noes - 132 |
|
13 Nov 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context Christopher Chope voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 72 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 250 Noes - 133 |
|
13 Nov 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context Christopher Chope voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 71 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 252 Noes - 130 |
|
13 Nov 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context Christopher Chope voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 69 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 254 Noes - 129 |
|
13 Nov 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context Christopher Chope voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 72 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 257 Noes - 128 |
|
13 Nov 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context Christopher Chope voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 72 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 268 Noes - 78 |
|
13 Nov 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context Christopher Chope voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 73 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 255 Noes - 128 |
|
13 Nov 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context Christopher Chope voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 75 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 264 Noes - 125 |
|
13 Nov 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context Christopher Chope voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 75 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 254 Noes - 135 |
|
24 Nov 2025 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context Christopher Chope voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 90 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 99 Noes - 367 |
|
24 Nov 2025 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context Christopher Chope voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 1 Conservative No votes vs 1 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 74 Noes - 311 |
|
24 Nov 2025 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context Christopher Chope voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 90 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 158 Noes - 318 |
|
25 Nov 2025 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context Christopher Chope voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 98 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 187 Noes - 320 |
|
25 Nov 2025 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context Christopher Chope voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 96 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 322 Noes - 179 |
|
25 Nov 2025 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context Christopher Chope voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 99 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 189 Noes - 320 |
| Speeches |
|---|
|
Christopher Chope speeches from: Typhoon Fighter Sovereign Capability
Christopher Chope contributed 3 speeches (110 words) Wednesday 12th November 2025 - Westminster Hall Ministry of Defence |
| Written Answers |
|---|
|
First-tier Tribunal: Judges
Asked by: Christopher Chope (Conservative - Christchurch) Tuesday 11th November 2025 Question to the Ministry of Justice: To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, what the status is of the recruitment exercise which closed in November 2024 for Judges of the First-Tier Tribunal; how many applications were received; and how many appointments have been made (a) in total, (b) to the Social Entitlement Tribunal, (c) to the Health Education and Social Care Tribunal, (d) to the Immigration and Asylum Tribunal and (e) to the War Pensions and Armed Forces Compensation Tribunal. Answered by Sarah Sackman - Minister of State (Ministry of Justice) The recruitment for salaried judges of the First-tier Tribunal (FtT) closed for applications in November 2024. The recruitment for fee-paid judges of the First-tier Tribunal closed for applications in June 2024. Both exercises included recruitment for judges to be assigned to the Immigration and Asylum Chamber (IAC), Social Entitlement Chamber (SEC), Health, Education and Social Care Chamber (HESC) and War Pensions and Armed Forces Compensation Chamber (WPAFCC). Following appointment, assignment to specific First-tier Tribunal Chambers is the responsibility of the Senior President of Tribunals. This process is still underway for both the salaried and fee-paid appointments and so we cannot confirm the final numbers. It is also not yet known how many judges will be assigned to the IAC from both the fee-paid and salaried exercises. The independent Judicial Appointments Commission publishes updated data quarterly on applications and the number of selections made for appointment once recruitment is completed: Completed exercises 2022-2025 - Judicial Appointments Commission. Information on the number of judges in post, leavers, new appointments and promotions is published annually at: https://www.gov.uk/government/collections/judicial-diversity-statistics. To increase IAC capacity, further specific recruitment for up to 70 IAC fee paid judges of the First-tier Tribunal recruitment is underway and recruitment for up to 30 IAC salaried judges of the First-tier Tribunal will commence shortly this calendar year. |
|
First-tier Tribunal: Judges
Asked by: Christopher Chope (Conservative - Christchurch) Tuesday 11th November 2025 Question to the Ministry of Justice: To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, pursuant to the Answer of 21 July 2025 to Question 68347 on Immigration: Appeals, when the recruitment exercise commenced in 2024 for the First Tier Tribunal will be completed; and how many vacant posts at the Immigration and Asylum Tribunal will (a) be filled and (b) remain unfilled. Answered by Sarah Sackman - Minister of State (Ministry of Justice) The recruitment for salaried judges of the First-tier Tribunal (FtT) closed for applications in November 2024. The recruitment for fee-paid judges of the First-tier Tribunal closed for applications in June 2024. Both exercises included recruitment for judges to be assigned to the Immigration and Asylum Chamber (IAC), Social Entitlement Chamber (SEC), Health, Education and Social Care Chamber (HESC) and War Pensions and Armed Forces Compensation Chamber (WPAFCC). Following appointment, assignment to specific First-tier Tribunal Chambers is the responsibility of the Senior President of Tribunals. This process is still underway for both the salaried and fee-paid appointments and so we cannot confirm the final numbers. It is also not yet known how many judges will be assigned to the IAC from both the fee-paid and salaried exercises. The independent Judicial Appointments Commission publishes updated data quarterly on applications and the number of selections made for appointment once recruitment is completed: Completed exercises 2022-2025 - Judicial Appointments Commission. Information on the number of judges in post, leavers, new appointments and promotions is published annually at: https://www.gov.uk/government/collections/judicial-diversity-statistics. To increase IAC capacity, further specific recruitment for up to 70 IAC fee paid judges of the First-tier Tribunal recruitment is underway and recruitment for up to 30 IAC salaried judges of the First-tier Tribunal will commence shortly this calendar year. |
|
House of Commons: Escalators
Asked by: Christopher Chope (Conservative - Christchurch) Tuesday 11th November 2025 Question To ask the hon. Member for Blaenau Gwent and Rhymney, representing the House of Commons Commission, for what reason the escalator from the House of Commons Members' car park does not cut off automatically when not in use. Answered by Nick Smith The escalator is fitted with controls that allow the speed to vary dependent on demand and, in periods of low demand, runs at a slow speed to be energy efficient. The design of the escalator is such that it does not stop completely – this is a safety feature to ensure that anyone travelling on the escalator is not subjected to any sudden movements which could cause them to lose balance. This is usual in many high traffic areas in buildings of this type. |
|
Personal Independence Payment
Asked by: Christopher Chope (Conservative - Christchurch) Wednesday 12th November 2025 Question to the Department for Work and Pensions: To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, how many recipients of Personal Independence Payment are aged (a) 16, (b) 17 and (c) 18; how many of those are in full time education; and how many of those are in each constituency in England. Answered by Stephen Timms - Minister of State (Department for Work and Pensions) The information requested on the number of Personal Independence Payment (PIP) recipients aged 16, 17 and 18 in full-time education is not held centrally and to provide it would incur disproportionate cost.
Information on Personal Independence Payment (PIP) recipients by age and parliamentary constituency in England is available via Stats-Xplore (https://stat-xplore.dwp.gov.uk/webapi/jsf/login.xhtml). Guidance on how to use PIP data on Stat-Xplore is also available here: Personal Independence Payment data on Stat-Xplore: user guide - GOV.UK. An account is not required to use Stat-Xplore, the ‘Guest Login’ feature gives instant access to the main functions.
The relevant information can be found in the ‘PIP Cases with Entitlement from 2019’ dataset.
To filter for parliamentary constituencies in England, under the ‘Westminster Parliamentary Constituency 2024’ category, select ‘DWP policy ownership’. Click on the arrow beside ‘England’ and select ‘Westminster Parliamentary Constituency 2024’ to include all English constituencies.
Next, to filter by specific ages, under ‘Age (bands and single year)’, expand the ‘16-19’ category and select the ages 16, 17 and 18 as required. |
|
Palace of Westminster: Lifts
Asked by: Christopher Chope (Conservative - Christchurch) Tuesday 11th November 2025 Question To ask the hon. Member for Blaenau Gwent and Rhymney, representing the House of Commons Commission, for how many days lift number 77 in the Palace of Westminster has been out of order this year; for what reason it remains out of order; and when it is expected to be operating again. Answered by Nick Smith Lift number 77 (HOP77) has been out of order for a total of 51 days in 2025 over four occasions, the most recent of which was 47 days. HOP 77 was returned to service on 7 November 2025 following the replacement of a printed circuit board which controlled the door opening mechanism. |
|
Department for Energy Security and Net Zero: Correspondence and Written Questions
Asked by: Christopher Chope (Conservative - Christchurch) Wednesday 12th November 2025 Question to the Department for Energy Security & Net Zero: To ask the Secretary of State for Energy Security and Net Zero, pursuant to the Answer of 4 November to Question 86604, how many full time equivalent staff are employed in his office to (a) answer invitations and (b) answer Parliamentary Questions. Answered by Michael Shanks - Minister of State (Department for Energy Security and Net Zero) The answering of Ministerial invitations and Parliamentary Questions is shared across Private Offices and the Parliamentary Unit. Full time equivalency on these work streams fluctuates with business needs. |
|
Coronavirus: Vaccination
Asked by: Christopher Chope (Conservative - Christchurch) Wednesday 12th November 2025 Question to the Department of Health and Social Care: To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, what has been the cost to the public purse of the indemnity to pharmaceutical companies in the context of Covid-19 vaccines. Answered by Ashley Dalton - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department of Health and Social Care) The Government cannot comment on the terms on which COVID-19 vaccinations were procured, which are confidential. |
|
Parkfield School Christchurch
Asked by: Christopher Chope (Conservative - Christchurch) Wednesday 12th November 2025 Question to the Department for Education: To ask the Secretary of State for Education, when she plans to dispose of the redundant site of the former Parkfield School at Hurn; and what estimate she has made of the (a) security and (b) opportunity costs of the premises remaining unused. Answered by Josh MacAlister - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Education) The school building was officially handed back to the department on 29 August 2025. Since that time LocatED have been managing the site on behalf of the department. The department has sought expressions of interest from academy trusts to use the site for alternative educational uses. It has also been working closely with Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole Council over a possible reuse of the property for special educational needs provision. Whilst discussions as to an alternative educational use are ongoing, the department is finalising arrangements for an interim use of the site by neighbouring Bournemouth airport, which will create an income for the department and avoid ongoing site management costs. This should be in place by the end of the year. |
|
Hadush Kebatu
Asked by: Christopher Chope (Conservative - Christchurch) Wednesday 12th November 2025 Question to the Home Office: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, pursuant to the Answer of 4 November to Question 86603, whether the £500 facilitation payment given to Hadush Kebatu was paid under the (a) Voluntary Returns Service or (b) Facilitated Return Scheme; and what was the qualifying criterion which was applied. Answered by Alex Norris - Minister of State (Home Office) Mr Kebatu was issued a £500 discretionary payment to avoid the potential disruption of this return. Cancelling the return at the last stage would have triggered substantial costs. If the operation had been halted before departure, the minimum unavoidable escort and ticketing costs would have exceeded several thousands of pounds. The Home Office applies small discretionary payments, where appropriate, to prevent the failure of returns. These payments facilitate returns by making them quicker and cheaper, helping to avoid delays and additional costs. Decisions on their use are operational in nature. |
|
Undocumented Migrants: Deportation
Asked by: Christopher Chope (Conservative - Christchurch) Monday 17th November 2025 Question to the Home Office: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, pursuant to the Answer of 12 November to Question 88185 on Hadush Kebatu, how many small discretionary payments to prevent the failure of returns were made by the Home Office in each of the last 12 months for which figures are available; what was (a) the maximum and (b) the minimum amount paid; and were such payments made under (i) the Voluntary Returns Service, (ii) the Facilitated Returns Scheme or (iii) another scheme. Answered by Alex Norris - Minister of State (Home Office) The information requested regarding small discretionary payments to prevent the failure of returns are not available from published statistics. The Home Office does already publish all available information on returns expenditure in the Home Office Annual Report and accounts at Home Office annual reports and accounts - Home Office annual reports and accounts - GOV.UK |
|
Carbon Emissions
Asked by: Christopher Chope (Conservative - Christchurch) Monday 17th November 2025 Question to the Department for Energy Security & Net Zero: To ask the Secretary of State for Energy Security and Net Zero, in 1990, what was the contribution in parts per million of CO2 emissions from the UK into the atmosphere (a) gross of sequestration and (b) net of sequestration; and what was the contribution for 2024. Answered by Michael Shanks - Minister of State (Department for Energy Security and Net Zero) UK net territorial CO2 emissions were 603.3 million tonnes in 1990 and provisionally estimated at 290.4 million tonnes in 2024.
Source: DESNZ, provisional 2024 UK net territorial greenhouse gas emissions statistics. CO2 is calculated in terms of net emissions, which means total emissions minus total removals from the atmosphere. Therefore, it is not possible to report gross CO2 emissions. |
|
Renewable Energy: Carbon Emissions
Asked by: Christopher Chope (Conservative - Christchurch) Monday 17th November 2025 Question to the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs: To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, what percentage of total global carbon emissions is attributable to (a) wind turbines imported into the UK, (b) solar panels imported into the UK, (c) biomass imported into the UK and (d) all other forms of renewable energy imported into the UK. Answered by Emma Hardy - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs) Defra does not hold information on total global carbon emissions and as such Defra does not hold information on the amount of UK consumption carbon emission attributable to these sectors however these emissions are considered within our UK Carbon Footprint statistics. |
|
NHS: Subject Access Requests
Asked by: Christopher Chope (Conservative - Christchurch) Monday 17th November 2025 Question to the Department of Health and Social Care: To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, how many data subject access requests were received by the NHS in England in the last year for which figures are available; and how many of those requests were responded to with the requested data within (a) one and (b) three months. Answered by Zubir Ahmed - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department of Health and Social Care) Information on the number of data subject access requests received by National Health Service organisations, and the time taken to respond, is not collected centrally. |
|
Carbon Emissions
Asked by: Christopher Chope (Conservative - Christchurch) Monday 17th November 2025 Question to the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs: To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, what percentage of total global carbon emissions are attributable to UK consumption, including consumption relating to (a) domestic production and (b) imports. Answered by Emma Hardy - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs) Information about the Carbon footprint for the UK is published here: https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/uks-carbon-footprint. Data are available up to 2022.
Defra does not hold information on total global carbon emissions. |
|
Undocumented Migrants: Deportation
Asked by: Christopher Chope (Conservative - Christchurch) Tuesday 18th November 2025 Question to the Home Office: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, pursuant to the Answer of 12 November 2025 to Question 88185 on Hadush Kebatu, what operational guidance her Department has issued to prevent small discretionary payments from being used as (a) inducements and (b) bribes. Answered by Alex Norris - Minister of State (Home Office) All discretionary payments must go through a clearance process. Operational managers take into consideration the cost of returning someone to their final place of stay and supporting welfare and safety. As always with expenditure on returns, these one-off costs must be set against the much higher long-term costs that would result from the same individuals remaining in the UK, including, where necessary, ongoing expenditure on accommodation or detention and the legal processes required to authorise their removal. |
|
Asylum: Appeals
Asked by: Christopher Chope (Conservative - Christchurch) Tuesday 18th November 2025 Question to the Home Office: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, how many of the initial asylum decisions resulting in refusal have been the subject of an appeal to the First-tier Tribunal between October 2024 and March 2025; and how many of those (a) were successful, (b) were unsuccessful and (c) are outstanding. Answered by Alex Norris - Minister of State (Home Office) The Home Office publishes data on asylum in the ‘Immigration System Statistics Quarterly Release’. Data on asylum appeals lodged, and determined by outcome, are published in tables Asy_D06 and Asy_D07, respectively, of the asylum detailed datasets. The latest data relates to the year ending March 2023. Appeals data for April 2023 onwards is not available due to ongoing work on a new case working system. Updated data will be included in a future edition of the Immigration system statistics release. The Ministry of Justice publishes data on asylum appeals in the ‘Tribunal Statistics Quarterly Release’. Data on the open caseload for appeals relating to asylum, protection and revocation of protection is published in table FIA_4. The latest data relates to as at March 2025. |
|
Fraud: Dorset
Asked by: Christopher Chope (Conservative - Christchurch) Thursday 20th November 2025 Question to the Home Office: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, if she will conduct an inquiry into the reasons why Dorset Police discontinued their investigation into the fraudulent activities identified in Operation Ringwood. Answered by Sarah Jones - Minister of State (Home Office) The Home Office is aware of the Operation Ringwood investigation and strongly sympathises with the distressing experience that victims have faced. The Home Secretary is unable to intervene in any operational decisions made by law enforcement regarding reports and the investigation of potential crimes. This is to maintain the independence of the organisations involved, including the police and courts, which remains a fundamental part of the British justice system. We are committed to strengthening law enforcement capabilities to tackle fraud and protect the public. Further detail will be set out in the upcoming Fraud Strategy. |
|
Fraud: Dorset
Asked by: Christopher Chope (Conservative - Christchurch) Thursday 27th November 2025 Question to the Home Office: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, pursuant to the answer of 20th November to question 86600, if she will use her powers under Section 41A of The Police Act 1996 to require Dorset Police to investigate remedial measures by reason of its failure to conclude to discharge its functions relating to the investigation and prosecution of fraud. Answered by Dan Jarvis - Minister of State (Cabinet Office) Operational policing is not a Home Office matter. Chief Constables are operationally independent, with decisions often made based on threat, risk and harm. The Home Secretary has powers under the Police Reform and Social Responsibility Act 2011 to ensure an efficient and effective policing system, which includes the power under S.40 and 40A of the Police Act 1996. Under the Policing Protocol these powers can only be used in exceptional circumstances in order to prevent or mitigate risk to the public or national security. Where necessary, this Government has been clear it will provide active leadership for policing to make it more efficient and effective. Fraud is now incorporated into His Majesty’s Inspectorate of Constabulary and Fire & Rescue Services (HMICFRS) Police Efficiency Effectiveness and Legitimacy (PEEL) framework. The upcoming inspection cycle will formally assess each police force in England and Wales on their performance in tackling fraud. This will provide valuable insight on investigative practices whilst also improving standards and consistency across police forces. |
|
Fraud: Dorset
Asked by: Christopher Chope (Conservative - Christchurch) Thursday 27th November 2025 Question to the Home Office: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, pursuant to the answer of 20th November to question 86600, to whom Dorset Police is accountable for discontinuing investigations into serious fraud. Answered by Dan Jarvis - Minister of State (Cabinet Office) Operational policing is not a Home Office matter. Chief Constables are operationally independent, with decisions often made based on threat, risk and harm. The Home Secretary has powers under the Police Reform and Social Responsibility Act 2011 to ensure an efficient and effective policing system, which includes the power under S.40 and 40A of the Police Act 1996. Under the Policing Protocol these powers can only be used in exceptional circumstances in order to prevent or mitigate risk to the public or national security. Where necessary, this Government has been clear it will provide active leadership for policing to make it more efficient and effective. Fraud is now incorporated into His Majesty’s Inspectorate of Constabulary and Fire & Rescue Services (HMICFRS) Police Efficiency Effectiveness and Legitimacy (PEEL) framework. The upcoming inspection cycle will formally assess each police force in England and Wales on their performance in tackling fraud. This will provide valuable insight on investigative practices whilst also improving standards and consistency across police forces. |
|
Department for Energy Security and Net Zero: Correspondence and Written Questions
Asked by: Christopher Chope (Conservative - Christchurch) Thursday 27th November 2025 Question to the Department for Energy Security & Net Zero: To ask the Secretary of State for Energy Security and Net Zero, pursuant to the answer to WPQ 88184, how many staff in a) each of the Private Offices and b) Parliamentary Unit were engaged on 12th November with a) answering Ministerial invitations and b) answering PQs. Answered by Michael Shanks - Minister of State (Department for Energy Security and Net Zero) This information is not held. |
| Live Transcript |
|---|
|
Note: Cited speaker in live transcript data may not always be accurate. Check video link to confirm. |
|
27 Nov 2025, 3:05 p.m. - House of Commons " Yes, sir. Christopher Chope. " Sir Christopher Chope MP (Christchurch, Conservative) - View Video - View Transcript |
|
25 Nov 2025, 2:39 p.m. - House of Commons " So, Christopher Chope. " Rt Hon Ed Miliband MP, The Secretary of State for Energy Security and Net Zero (Doncaster North, Labour) - View Video - View Transcript |
|
27 Nov 2025, 11:14 a.m. - House of Commons " Sir Christopher Chope. " Sir Christopher Chope MP (Christchurch, Conservative) - View Video - View Transcript |
| Parliamentary Debates |
|---|
|
Westminster Hall
0 speeches (None words) Wednesday 12th November 2025 - Westminster Hall |
| Select Committee Documents |
|---|
|
Wednesday 19th November 2025
Special Report - 3rd Special Report – The new National Policy Statement for nuclear energy generation: Government Response Energy Security and Net Zero Committee Found: Bill Esterson (Labour; Sefton Central) (Chair) Ms Polly Billington (Labour; East Thanet) Sir Christopher Chope |
|
Wednesday 19th November 2025
Special Report - 2nd Special Report - Gridlock or Growth? Avoiding energy planning chaos: Government Response Energy Security and Net Zero Committee Found: Bill Esterson (Labour; Sefton Central) (Chair) Ms Polly Billington (Labour; East Thanet) Sir Christopher Chope |
|
Wednesday 12th November 2025
Oral Evidence - Rt. Hon. Dominic Grieve KC, Rt. Hon. Sir Michael Ellis KBE, KC, and Sir Jeremy Wright Sub judice resolution in the House of Commons - Procedure Committee Found: Watch the meeting Members present: Bambos Charalambous (Chair); James Asser; Sir Christopher Chope; |
| Parliamentary Research |
|---|
|
Pension Schemes Bill 2024-25: Progress of the bill - CBP-10404
Nov. 21 2025 Found: The chair, Sir Christopher Chope, noted that MPs would need to resolve the issue at report stage.51 |
| Bill Documents |
|---|
|
Oct. 24 2025
Letter from Torsten Bell MP to Christopher Chope MP, Emma Lewell MP, Esther McVey MP, Karl Turner MP, Dawn Butler MP regarding clarification of remarks made during committee proceedings. Pension Schemes Bill 2024-26 Will write letters Found: Letter from Torsten Bell MP to Christopher Chope MP, Emma Lewell MP, Esther McVey MP, Karl Turner MP, |
| Calendar |
|---|
|
Wednesday 19th November 2025 2:30 p.m. Procedure Committee - Oral evidence Subject: Elections within the House of Commons At 2:45pm: Oral evidence Peter Stanyon, Chief Executive, Association of Electoral Administrators View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Tuesday 27th January 2026 11:30 a.m. Modernisation Committee - Private Meeting View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Wednesday 3rd December 2025 2:30 p.m. Procedure Committee - Oral evidence Subject: Sub judice resolution in the House of Commons At 2:45pm: Oral evidence The Rt Hon. the Baroness Scotland of Asthal KC, former Attorney General At 3:30pm: Oral evidence Professor Penney Lewis, Commissioner for Criminal Law, Law Commission View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Wednesday 3rd December 2025 2:30 p.m. Energy Security and Net Zero Committee - Oral evidence Subject: Building support for the energy transition At 3:00pm: Oral evidence Emma Pinchbeck - Chief Executive at Climate Change Committee Professor Eric Wolff - Fellow at The Royal Society Professor Hugh Montgomery OBE - Director at Centre for Human Health and Performance, University College London View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Wednesday 10th December 2025 10 a.m. Procedure Committee - Oral evidence Subject: Work of the Leader of the House At 10:15am: Oral evidence Rt Hon Sir Alan Campbell MP - Leader of the House at House of Commons View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Wednesday 10th December 2025 2:30 p.m. Energy Security and Net Zero Committee - Oral evidence Subject: The cost of energy At 3:00pm: Oral evidence Susie Elks - Senior Policy Advisor at E3G Tom Edwards - Principal Modeller at Cornwall Insight Professor Michael Grubb - Professor of Energy and Climate Change and Director of UCL Centre for Net Zero Market Design at UCL At 4:00pm: Oral evidence Ana Musat - Executive Director, Policy & Engagement at RenewableUK Tom Glover - UK Country Chair at RWE Adam Bell - Director of Policy at Stonehaven View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Tuesday 13th January 2026 11:30 a.m. Modernisation Committee - Private Meeting View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Wednesday 17th December 2025 2:30 p.m. Procedure Committee - Private Meeting View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Wednesday 17th December 2025 2:30 p.m. Energy Security and Net Zero Committee - Oral evidence Subject: Revisiting the nuclear roadmap At 3:00pm: Oral evidence Professor Fiona Rayment OBE - Visiting Professor at Dalton Nuclear Institute, previously the Chief Science and Technology Officer at the National Nuclear Laboratory Dr Doug Parr - Chief Scientist and Policy Director at Greenpeace UK Professor Stephen Thomas - Emeritus Professor of Energy Policy at University of Greenwich Sam Dumitriu - Head of Policy at Britain Remade View calendar - Add to calendar |
| Select Committee Inquiry |
|---|
|
17 Jul 2025
Planning for nuclear energy generation Energy Security and Net Zero Committee (Select) Not accepting submissions The UK is embarking on an ambitious programme of investment in nuclear energy, seeking to reverse decades of declining capacity. The Government is counting on new nuclear to help deliver energy security and decarbonise electricity generation. Announcing funding for the Sizewell C nuclear power plant in June, the Energy Secretary said “we need new nuclear to deliver a golden age of clean energy abundance.” But past promises of a golden age of nuclear energy have so far failed to materialise. A new reactor has not been connected to the grid for 30 years. Nuclear projects have historically faced unique barriers, including complex regulatory and planning processes. The Government now aims to deliver reforms to streamline planning approvals and give greater certainty to developers. Consultation and scrutiny of EN-7The National Policy Statement for Nuclear Energy Generation (EN-7) has been put forward to help guide planners as they seek to make decisions on siting new nuclear infrastructure. Under the Planning Act 2008, a National Policy Statement (NPS) like EN-7 must undergo public consultation and parliamentary scrutiny before it can be formally designated. EN-7 has undergone two rounds of consultation: the first focused on potential changes to the nuclear siting approach; the second introduced the full draft text. The Committee is now beginning the parliamentary scrutiny process, offering MPs the opportunity to hear from industry, experts, and the public to examine the implications of the framework set out in EN-7 in detail. What is EN-7?EN-7 is intended to become the principal guide for decisions on future nuclear power stations in England and Wales. Nuclear infrastructure proposals are currently limited to eight sites in England and Wales. EN-7 replaces this with a criteria-based approach. It is also intended to support development of a broader range of nuclear technologies like Small Modular Reactors (SMRs) and Advanced Modular Reactors (AMRs), as well as traditional gigawatt-scale plants. The aim is to create a future-proof planning framework that enables a pipeline of new nuclear projects to come forward. Call for EvidenceThe Energy Security and Net Zero Committee is now inviting written submissions to help assess whether EN-7 provides a coherent and effective framework for enabling the UK’s nuclear ambitions. |
|
24 Nov 2025
Written Parliamentary Questions Procedure Committee (Select) Not accepting submissions Written Parliamentary Questions (WPQs) are an important tool for Members of Parliament to obtain detailed and targeted information to aid in the scrutiny of Government policy and operations. The long-established purpose of WPQs is to uphold transparency and accountability by ensuring that the Government provides clear and timely information to Parliament, and to the public via their publication. Recent concerns have been raised that the present WPQ system has been coming under strain and not fully delivering on its intended purpose. This inquiry provides the opportunity to undertake a detailed review of WPQs, to look at their purpose, their use, and the processes that underpin them, in order to identify potential recommendations for improvement and reform. |