Information between 16th November 2025 - 6th December 2025
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.
| Division Votes |
|---|
|
24 Nov 2025 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context Christopher Chope voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 90 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 99 Noes - 367 |
|
24 Nov 2025 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context Christopher Chope voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 1 Conservative No votes vs 1 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 74 Noes - 311 |
|
24 Nov 2025 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context Christopher Chope voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 90 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 158 Noes - 318 |
|
25 Nov 2025 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context Christopher Chope voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 98 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 187 Noes - 320 |
|
25 Nov 2025 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context Christopher Chope voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 96 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 322 Noes - 179 |
|
25 Nov 2025 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context Christopher Chope voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 99 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 189 Noes - 320 |
|
2 Dec 2025 - Budget Resolutions - View Vote Context Christopher Chope voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 89 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 364 Noes - 167 |
|
2 Dec 2025 - Budget Resolutions - View Vote Context Christopher Chope voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 90 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 327 Noes - 182 |
|
2 Dec 2025 - Budget Resolutions - View Vote Context Christopher Chope voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 89 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 362 Noes - 164 |
|
2 Dec 2025 - Budget Resolutions - View Vote Context Christopher Chope voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 89 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 348 Noes - 176 |
|
2 Dec 2025 - Budget Resolutions - View Vote Context Christopher Chope voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 90 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 369 Noes - 166 |
|
2 Dec 2025 - Budget Resolutions - View Vote Context Christopher Chope voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 92 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 371 Noes - 166 |
|
2 Dec 2025 - Budget Resolutions - View Vote Context Christopher Chope voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 88 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 357 Noes - 174 |
| Speeches |
|---|
|
Christopher Chope speeches from: Right to Trial by Jury
Christopher Chope contributed 1 speech (34 words) Thursday 27th November 2025 - Commons Chamber Ministry of Justice |
|
Christopher Chope speeches from: Budget Resolutions
Christopher Chope contributed 1 speech (770 words) Thursday 27th November 2025 - Commons Chamber Department for Work and Pensions |
|
Christopher Chope speeches from: COP30
Christopher Chope contributed 1 speech (85 words) Tuesday 25th November 2025 - Commons Chamber Department for Energy Security & Net Zero |
| Written Answers |
|---|
|
Undocumented Migrants: Deportation
Asked by: Christopher Chope (Conservative - Christchurch) Monday 17th November 2025 Question to the Home Office: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, pursuant to the Answer of 12 November to Question 88185 on Hadush Kebatu, how many small discretionary payments to prevent the failure of returns were made by the Home Office in each of the last 12 months for which figures are available; what was (a) the maximum and (b) the minimum amount paid; and were such payments made under (i) the Voluntary Returns Service, (ii) the Facilitated Returns Scheme or (iii) another scheme. Answered by Alex Norris - Minister of State (Home Office) The information requested regarding small discretionary payments to prevent the failure of returns are not available from published statistics. The Home Office does already publish all available information on returns expenditure in the Home Office Annual Report and accounts at Home Office annual reports and accounts - Home Office annual reports and accounts - GOV.UK |
|
Carbon Emissions
Asked by: Christopher Chope (Conservative - Christchurch) Monday 17th November 2025 Question to the Department for Energy Security & Net Zero: To ask the Secretary of State for Energy Security and Net Zero, in 1990, what was the contribution in parts per million of CO2 emissions from the UK into the atmosphere (a) gross of sequestration and (b) net of sequestration; and what was the contribution for 2024. Answered by Michael Shanks - Minister of State (Department for Energy Security and Net Zero) UK net territorial CO2 emissions were 603.3 million tonnes in 1990 and provisionally estimated at 290.4 million tonnes in 2024.
Source: DESNZ, provisional 2024 UK net territorial greenhouse gas emissions statistics. CO2 is calculated in terms of net emissions, which means total emissions minus total removals from the atmosphere. Therefore, it is not possible to report gross CO2 emissions. |
|
Renewable Energy: Carbon Emissions
Asked by: Christopher Chope (Conservative - Christchurch) Monday 17th November 2025 Question to the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs: To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, what percentage of total global carbon emissions is attributable to (a) wind turbines imported into the UK, (b) solar panels imported into the UK, (c) biomass imported into the UK and (d) all other forms of renewable energy imported into the UK. Answered by Emma Hardy - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs) Defra does not hold information on total global carbon emissions and as such Defra does not hold information on the amount of UK consumption carbon emission attributable to these sectors however these emissions are considered within our UK Carbon Footprint statistics. |
|
Carbon Emissions
Asked by: Christopher Chope (Conservative - Christchurch) Monday 17th November 2025 Question to the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs: To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, what percentage of total global carbon emissions are attributable to UK consumption, including consumption relating to (a) domestic production and (b) imports. Answered by Emma Hardy - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs) Information about the Carbon footprint for the UK is published here: https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/uks-carbon-footprint. Data are available up to 2022.
Defra does not hold information on total global carbon emissions. |
|
Undocumented Migrants: Deportation
Asked by: Christopher Chope (Conservative - Christchurch) Tuesday 18th November 2025 Question to the Home Office: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, pursuant to the Answer of 12 November 2025 to Question 88185 on Hadush Kebatu, what operational guidance her Department has issued to prevent small discretionary payments from being used as (a) inducements and (b) bribes. Answered by Alex Norris - Minister of State (Home Office) All discretionary payments must go through a clearance process. Operational managers take into consideration the cost of returning someone to their final place of stay and supporting welfare and safety. As always with expenditure on returns, these one-off costs must be set against the much higher long-term costs that would result from the same individuals remaining in the UK, including, where necessary, ongoing expenditure on accommodation or detention and the legal processes required to authorise their removal. |
|
Asylum: Appeals
Asked by: Christopher Chope (Conservative - Christchurch) Tuesday 18th November 2025 Question to the Home Office: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, how many of the initial asylum decisions resulting in refusal have been the subject of an appeal to the First-tier Tribunal between October 2024 and March 2025; and how many of those (a) were successful, (b) were unsuccessful and (c) are outstanding. Answered by Alex Norris - Minister of State (Home Office) The Home Office publishes data on asylum in the ‘Immigration System Statistics Quarterly Release’. Data on asylum appeals lodged, and determined by outcome, are published in tables Asy_D06 and Asy_D07, respectively, of the asylum detailed datasets. The latest data relates to the year ending March 2023. Appeals data for April 2023 onwards is not available due to ongoing work on a new case working system. Updated data will be included in a future edition of the Immigration system statistics release. The Ministry of Justice publishes data on asylum appeals in the ‘Tribunal Statistics Quarterly Release’. Data on the open caseload for appeals relating to asylum, protection and revocation of protection is published in table FIA_4. The latest data relates to as at March 2025. |
|
Fraud: Dorset
Asked by: Christopher Chope (Conservative - Christchurch) Thursday 20th November 2025 Question to the Home Office: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, if she will conduct an inquiry into the reasons why Dorset Police discontinued their investigation into the fraudulent activities identified in Operation Ringwood. Answered by Sarah Jones - Minister of State (Home Office) The Home Office is aware of the Operation Ringwood investigation and strongly sympathises with the distressing experience that victims have faced. The Home Secretary is unable to intervene in any operational decisions made by law enforcement regarding reports and the investigation of potential crimes. This is to maintain the independence of the organisations involved, including the police and courts, which remains a fundamental part of the British justice system. We are committed to strengthening law enforcement capabilities to tackle fraud and protect the public. Further detail will be set out in the upcoming Fraud Strategy. |
|
Fraud: Dorset
Asked by: Christopher Chope (Conservative - Christchurch) Thursday 27th November 2025 Question to the Home Office: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, pursuant to the answer of 20th November to question 86600, if she will use her powers under Section 41A of The Police Act 1996 to require Dorset Police to investigate remedial measures by reason of its failure to conclude to discharge its functions relating to the investigation and prosecution of fraud. Answered by Dan Jarvis - Minister of State (Cabinet Office) Operational policing is not a Home Office matter. Chief Constables are operationally independent, with decisions often made based on threat, risk and harm. The Home Secretary has powers under the Police Reform and Social Responsibility Act 2011 to ensure an efficient and effective policing system, which includes the power under S.40 and 40A of the Police Act 1996. Under the Policing Protocol these powers can only be used in exceptional circumstances in order to prevent or mitigate risk to the public or national security. Where necessary, this Government has been clear it will provide active leadership for policing to make it more efficient and effective. Fraud is now incorporated into His Majesty’s Inspectorate of Constabulary and Fire & Rescue Services (HMICFRS) Police Efficiency Effectiveness and Legitimacy (PEEL) framework. The upcoming inspection cycle will formally assess each police force in England and Wales on their performance in tackling fraud. This will provide valuable insight on investigative practices whilst also improving standards and consistency across police forces. |
|
Fraud: Dorset
Asked by: Christopher Chope (Conservative - Christchurch) Thursday 27th November 2025 Question to the Home Office: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, pursuant to the answer of 20th November to question 86600, to whom Dorset Police is accountable for discontinuing investigations into serious fraud. Answered by Dan Jarvis - Minister of State (Cabinet Office) Operational policing is not a Home Office matter. Chief Constables are operationally independent, with decisions often made based on threat, risk and harm. The Home Secretary has powers under the Police Reform and Social Responsibility Act 2011 to ensure an efficient and effective policing system, which includes the power under S.40 and 40A of the Police Act 1996. Under the Policing Protocol these powers can only be used in exceptional circumstances in order to prevent or mitigate risk to the public or national security. Where necessary, this Government has been clear it will provide active leadership for policing to make it more efficient and effective. Fraud is now incorporated into His Majesty’s Inspectorate of Constabulary and Fire & Rescue Services (HMICFRS) Police Efficiency Effectiveness and Legitimacy (PEEL) framework. The upcoming inspection cycle will formally assess each police force in England and Wales on their performance in tackling fraud. This will provide valuable insight on investigative practices whilst also improving standards and consistency across police forces. |
|
Department for Energy Security and Net Zero: Correspondence and Written Questions
Asked by: Christopher Chope (Conservative - Christchurch) Thursday 27th November 2025 Question to the Department for Energy Security & Net Zero: To ask the Secretary of State for Energy Security and Net Zero, pursuant to the answer to WPQ 88184, how many staff in a) each of the Private Offices and b) Parliamentary Unit were engaged on 12th November with a) answering Ministerial invitations and b) answering PQs. Answered by Michael Shanks - Minister of State (Department for Energy Security and Net Zero) This information is not held. |
|
Budget November 2025
Asked by: Christopher Chope (Conservative - Christchurch) Tuesday 2nd December 2025 Question to the HM Treasury: To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, if she will place in the Library a copy of each of the representations made by the Rt hon. and hon. Members to which she refers in the Budget statement. Answered by Dan Tomlinson - Exchequer Secretary (HM Treasury) The Stakeholder Representation Portal was open from 3 September 2025 until 15 October 2025 to allow members of the public, MPs and organisations to submit their views ahead of the fiscal event. HM Treasury does not publish individual representations on behalf of respondents.
|
|
NHS Business Services Authority
Asked by: Christopher Chope (Conservative - Christchurch) Wednesday 3rd December 2025 Question to the Department of Health and Social Care: To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, when the application for a mandatory reversal of the decision of the NHS Business Services Authority with reference VAD20662 will be actioned; and for what reason it has not yet been actioned. Answered by Ashley Dalton - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department of Health and Social Care) The Vaccine Damage Payment Scheme (VDPS) is administered by the NHS Business Services Authority (NHSBSA). It would not be appropriate to comment on the status of an individual claim to the VDPS, which is a matter for NHSBSA |
| Live Transcript |
|---|
|
Note: Cited speaker in live transcript data may not always be accurate. Check video link to confirm. |
|
27 Nov 2025, 3:05 p.m. - House of Commons " Yes, sir. Christopher Chope. " Sir Christopher Chope MP (Christchurch, Conservative) - View Video - View Transcript |
|
25 Nov 2025, 2:39 p.m. - House of Commons " So, Christopher Chope. " Rt Hon Ed Miliband MP, The Secretary of State for Energy Security and Net Zero (Doncaster North, Labour) - View Video - View Transcript |
|
27 Nov 2025, 11:14 a.m. - House of Commons " Sir Christopher Chope. " Sir Christopher Chope MP (Christchurch, Conservative) - View Video - View Transcript |
|
1 Dec 2025, 8:52 p.m. - House of Lords "was quoted by my former right hon. Friend Sir Christopher Chope in " Amendment:80 Lord Jackson of Peterborough (Conservative) - View Video - View Transcript |
| Parliamentary Debates |
|---|
|
Seafarers’ Welfare
27 speeches (9,391 words) Thursday 4th December 2025 - Westminster Hall Department for Transport |
|
Sentencing Bill
32 speeches (9,644 words) Committee stage: Part 2 Monday 1st December 2025 - Lords Chamber Ministry of Justice Mentions: 1: Lord Jackson of Peterborough (Con - Life peer) To quote the Times leader, which was cited in the other place by my honourable friend Sir Christopher Chope - Link to Speech |
|
COP30
72 speeches (11,533 words) Tuesday 25th November 2025 - Commons Chamber Department for Energy Security & Net Zero Mentions: 1: Stella Creasy (LAB - Walthamstow) Member for Christchurch (Sir Christopher Chope), who said that we should be adapting to reality, because - Link to Speech |
| Select Committee Documents |
|---|
|
Friday 5th December 2025
Report - 6th Report - Workforce planning to deliver clean, secure energy Energy Security and Net Zero Committee Found: Bill Esterson (Labour; Sefton Central) (Chair) Ms Polly Billington (Labour; East Thanet) Sir Christopher Chope |
|
Wednesday 19th November 2025
Special Report - 3rd Special Report – The new National Policy Statement for nuclear energy generation: Government Response Energy Security and Net Zero Committee Found: Bill Esterson (Labour; Sefton Central) (Chair) Ms Polly Billington (Labour; East Thanet) Sir Christopher Chope |
|
Wednesday 19th November 2025
Special Report - 2nd Special Report - Gridlock or Growth? Avoiding energy planning chaos: Government Response Energy Security and Net Zero Committee Found: Bill Esterson (Labour; Sefton Central) (Chair) Ms Polly Billington (Labour; East Thanet) Sir Christopher Chope |
| Parliamentary Research |
|---|
|
Pension Schemes Bill 2024-25: Progress of the bill - CBP-10404
Nov. 21 2025 Found: The chair, Sir Christopher Chope, noted that MPs would need to resolve the issue at report stage.51 |
| Bill Documents |
|---|
|
Oct. 24 2025
Letter from Torsten Bell MP to Christopher Chope MP, Emma Lewell MP, Esther McVey MP, Karl Turner MP, Dawn Butler MP regarding clarification of remarks made during committee proceedings. Pension Schemes Bill 2024-26 Will write letters Found: Letter from Torsten Bell MP to Christopher Chope MP, Emma Lewell MP, Esther McVey MP, Karl Turner MP, |
| Calendar |
|---|
|
Wednesday 3rd December 2025 2:30 p.m. Procedure Committee - Oral evidence Subject: Sub judice resolution in the House of Commons At 2:45pm: Oral evidence The Rt Hon. the Baroness Scotland of Asthal KC, former Attorney General At 3:30pm: Oral evidence Professor Penney Lewis, Commissioner for Criminal Law, Law Commission View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Wednesday 3rd December 2025 2:30 p.m. Energy Security and Net Zero Committee - Oral evidence Subject: Building support for the energy transition At 3:00pm: Oral evidence Emma Pinchbeck - Chief Executive at Climate Change Committee Professor Eric Wolff - Fellow at The Royal Society Professor Hugh Montgomery OBE - Director at Centre for Human Health and Performance, University College London View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Wednesday 10th December 2025 10 a.m. Procedure Committee - Oral evidence Subject: Work of the Leader of the House At 10:15am: Oral evidence Rt Hon Sir Alan Campbell MP - Leader of the House at House of Commons View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Wednesday 10th December 2025 2:30 p.m. Energy Security and Net Zero Committee - Oral evidence Subject: The cost of energy At 3:00pm: Oral evidence Susie Elks - Senior Policy Advisor at E3G Tom Edwards - Principal Modeller at Cornwall Insight Professor Michael Grubb - Professor of Energy and Climate Change and Director of UCL Centre for Net Zero Market Design at UCL At 4:00pm: Oral evidence Ana Musat - Executive Director, Policy & Engagement at RenewableUK Tom Glover - UK Country Chair at RWE Adam Bell - Director of Policy at Stonehaven View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Wednesday 17th December 2025 2:30 p.m. Procedure Committee - Private Meeting View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Wednesday 17th December 2025 2:30 p.m. Energy Security and Net Zero Committee - Oral evidence Subject: Revisiting the nuclear roadmap At 3:00pm: Oral evidence Professor Fiona Rayment OBE - Visiting Professor at Dalton Nuclear Institute, previously the Chief Science and Technology Officer at the National Nuclear Laboratory Dr Doug Parr - Chief Scientist and Policy Director at Greenpeace UK Professor Stephen Thomas - Emeritus Professor of Energy Policy at University of Greenwich Sam Dumitriu - Head of Policy at Britain Remade View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Tuesday 27th January 2026 11:30 a.m. Modernisation Committee - Private Meeting View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Tuesday 13th January 2026 11:30 a.m. Modernisation Committee - Private Meeting View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Tuesday 10th February 2026 11:30 a.m. Modernisation Committee - Private Meeting View calendar - Add to calendar |
| Select Committee Inquiry |
|---|
|
24 Nov 2025
Written Parliamentary Questions Procedure Committee (Select) Not accepting submissions Written Parliamentary Questions (WPQs) are an important tool for Members of Parliament to obtain detailed and targeted information to aid in the scrutiny of Government policy and operations. The long-established purpose of WPQs is to uphold transparency and accountability by ensuring that the Government provides clear and timely information to Parliament, and to the public via their publication. Recent concerns have been raised that the present WPQ system has been coming under strain and not fully delivering on its intended purpose. This inquiry provides the opportunity to undertake a detailed review of WPQs, to look at their purpose, their use, and the processes that underpin them, in order to identify potential recommendations for improvement and reform. |