Illegal Migration Act: Northern Ireland Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate

Illegal Migration Act: Northern Ireland

Christopher Chope Excerpts
Tuesday 14th May 2024

(1 month, 1 week ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Watch Debate
Tom Pursglove Portrait Tom Pursglove
- View Speech - Hansard - - - Excerpts

Article 2 of the Windsor framework ensures that there is no diminution of rights under the Belfast/Good Friday agreement. We have been consistently clear that the commitments in the Good Friday agreement should be implemented as they were always intended, not expanded to cover issues such as illegal migration. Rightly, we will take all steps to defend that position, including through our appeal.

Christopher Chope Portrait Sir Christopher Chope (Christchurch) (Con)
- View Speech - Hansard - -

I think we all sympathise with the Minister for having to take a line that is manifestly absurd. Why is it that the Government are not going to directly legislate to deal with this situation? The legislation is defective, and if we go to appeal and that appeal is rejected, we will have lost a lot more time. Why do we not act now to legislate and sort out this mess?

Tom Pursglove Portrait Tom Pursglove
- View Speech - Hansard - - - Excerpts

As I think my hon. Friend will appreciate, we are currently taking legal advice in relation to this judgment. It would not be right to give a running commentary on the substance of that legal advice, and as he knows, as a Minister, I am not in a position to disclose that advice in any event. We will robustly defend our position, but the outcome that my hon. Friend wishes to see—the operationalisation of the Rwanda policy to facilitate these relocations—has its legislative basis in the Nationality and Borders Act. The good news is that he was one of the colleagues who was in the Division Lobby supporting that Act, something that I think his constituents would welcome.