Feed-in Tariffs Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate

Chris Heaton-Harris

Main Page: Chris Heaton-Harris (Conservative - Daventry)

Feed-in Tariffs

Chris Heaton-Harris Excerpts
Thursday 9th February 2012

(12 years, 10 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text

Urgent Questions are proposed each morning by backbench MPs, and up to two may be selected each day by the Speaker. Chosen Urgent Questions are announced 30 minutes before Parliament sits each day.

Each Urgent Question requires a Government Minister to give a response on the debate topic.

This information is provided by Parallel Parliament and does not comprise part of the offical record

Lord Barker of Battle Portrait Gregory Barker
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I am afraid that the hon. Gentleman has misunderstood the statement. We are talking about growing the solar industry, and we expect a steady growth in the number of people who will be employed in the industry until 2015 and beyond.

Chris Heaton-Harris Portrait Chris Heaton-Harris (Daventry) (Con)
- Hansard - -

As one who approves of local production for local consumption, I welcome the statement, but can my hon. Friend tell us what is the recommendation for the small-scale wind FIT and why any change has been made in it?

Lord Barker of Battle Portrait Gregory Barker
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

There is to be a dramatic reduction in the tariff for small-scale wind. We had to take a hard look at it on a value-for-money basis, and as a result we are having to reduce it substantially to 21p. We must make it clear that we can justify paying a significant subsidy to individual technologies only if there is a real chance that they will reach a point at which they are cost-competitive with other mainstream renewables, and indeed fossil fuels, in the relatively near future. Unfortunately, that case has not been made so far in relation to small-scale wind, but I hope that the industry will respond with proposals for innovation and plans to make its technologies more cost-competitive.