All 2 Debates between Chloe Smith and Danielle Rowley

Oral Answers to Questions

Debate between Chloe Smith and Danielle Rowley
Wednesday 27th June 2018

(5 years, 10 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Danielle Rowley Portrait Danielle Rowley (Midlothian) (Lab)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

14. What representations he has received on the legality of the voter ID pilots.

Chloe Smith Portrait The Parliamentary Secretary, Cabinet Office (Chloe Smith)
- Hansard - -

My Department has not received any representations about the legality of the pilots. The powers to make the pilot scheme orders are in section 10 of the Representation of the People Act 2000, which was, of course, passed by Parliament. Those powers enable changes to be made to rules regarding the conduct of any local elections in England and Wales.

--- Later in debate ---
John Bercow Portrait Mr Speaker
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

The hon. Member for Crewe and Nantwich (Laura Smith) is signalling that that was very much her own question. It has to be said that Whips’ handouts are also not unprecedented in the House, but she is keen to draw attention to her own independent mindedness on this important matter.

Danielle Rowley Portrait Danielle Rowley
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I recently spoke at an event at Newbattle Abbey College in my constituency about encouraging people to vote—no Whips were in attendance. Meanwhile, the Government’s voter ID pilots saw at least 340 people turned away, and many more would have been discouraged from voting. Is this not a slap in the face of people who are working hard to encourage people to vote?

Chloe Smith Portrait Chloe Smith
- Hansard - -

To be clear, that was 340 out of a total of more than 230,000. I also want to be clear on the matter of principle. The Labour party accepts this principle for its own selection meetings, where it routinely asks for ID from members. Is this good enough for Labour but not for the rest of the country?

Equality of Voting Ages

Debate between Chloe Smith and Danielle Rowley
Wednesday 28th February 2018

(6 years, 2 months ago)

Westminster Hall
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts

Westminster Hall is an alternative Chamber for MPs to hold debates, named after the adjoining Westminster Hall.

Each debate is chaired by an MP from the Panel of Chairs, rather than the Speaker or Deputy Speaker. A Government Minister will give the final speech, and no votes may be called on the debate topic.

This information is provided by Parallel Parliament and does not comprise part of the offical record

Chloe Smith Portrait Chloe Smith
- Hansard - -

I am terribly sorry. The hon. Lady has only just arrived and I have very few minutes to answer the important points put by hon. Members who were here earlier.

On the rights of young people, 18 is widely recognised as the age one becomes an adult. For example, that is why we start jury service at 18. Some things that people can do at 16, such as join the Army, get married or enter into a civil partnership, can only be done with parental consent.

The UK has seen a general shift to a higher minimum age requirement on a number of things in recent years, with cross-party support. For example, in 1997 the minimum age for buying fireworks was raised from 16 to 18. In 2005, gambling at a casino was restricted to 18-year-olds and upwards. In 2007, the legal minimum age for buying tobacco in England, Scotland and Wales was raised from 16 to 18. You get the picture, Mr Davies. There are a number of things where we have moved the age from 16 to 18.

Danielle Rowley Portrait Danielle Rowley
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

Will the Minister give way?

Chloe Smith Portrait Chloe Smith
- Hansard - -

I will, but the hon. Lady will get fewer answers to her questions.

Danielle Rowley Portrait Danielle Rowley
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

Does the Minister agree that the examples she gives incur a health risk or a danger, and voting does not? Perhaps she thinks it does.