Representation of the People (Young People’s Enfranchisement and Education) Bill Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate

Representation of the People (Young People’s Enfranchisement and Education) Bill

Cheryl Gillan Excerpts
Friday 3rd November 2017

(6 years, 4 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
Bernard Jenkin Portrait Mr Jenkin
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

We take our children out campaigning with us, but that is not an argument for giving them the vote. Indeed, it is arguable that if we take 16 and 17-year-olds out campaigning with us, we have a duty of care to them because they are not yet adults. I will come to that point in a moment.

Cheryl Gillan Portrait Mrs Cheryl Gillan (Chesham and Amersham) (Con)
- Hansard - -

Will my hon. Friend give way?

Bernard Jenkin Portrait Mr Jenkin
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I really want to make some progress, but I will give way to my right hon. Friend.

Cheryl Gillan Portrait Mrs Gillan
- Hansard - -

I thank my hon. Friend for giving way, and express my pleasure at the fact that he is at least putting an argument out there, which I think is essential. Does he agree that engaging young people in politics is extremely important and that the element of the Bill that is highly significant is the part that covers citizenship and constitutional education? Does he also agree, however, that lowering the voting age to 16 is not necessary in order to bring about what I and many others in this House see as the important engagement with young people about the business of politics?

Bernard Jenkin Portrait Mr Jenkin
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I wholly agree with my right hon. Friend, who is a colleague on my Committee. The Bill definitely conflates two issues, and I suspect that one is trying to be a carrier for the other.

The point is that the voting age is 18, and in some cases higher, in the vast majority of countries around the world, including the greatest democracies such as the USA and in countries similar to our own such as Canada. The UK’s voting age is therefore in line with the norm, and that does not suggest any need for change.