To match an exact phrase, use quotation marks around the search term. eg. "Parliamentary Estate". Use "OR" or "AND" as link words to form more complex queries.


Keep yourself up-to-date with the latest developments by exploring our subscription options to receive notifications direct to your inbox

Written Question
Shipping: EEA Nationals
Wednesday 12th February 2020

Asked by: Cat Smith (Labour - Lancaster and Wyre)

Question to the Department for Transport:

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, what his policy is on the enforcement of the Equality Act 2010 (Work on Ships and Hovercraft) Regulations 2011 for seafarers from European Economic Area countries following the UK's departure from the EU.

Answered by Nusrat Ghani

Any seafarer of an EEA country working in Great Britain is currently able to bring a discrimination claim against their GB-based employer to employment tribunal under the Equality Act 2010 (Work on Ships and Hovercraft) Regulations 2011. The UK’s departure from the EU will not change this in any way.


Written Question
Motor Vehicles: Insurance
Monday 3rd February 2020

Asked by: Cat Smith (Labour - Lancaster and Wyre)

Question to the Department for Transport:

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, what steps his Department is taking to reduce the number of uninsured drivers.

Answered by George Freeman

The Department remains committed to ensuring that motorists comply with motoring laws, including the compulsory requirement for motor insurance.

Since 2011 Continuous Insurance Enforcement (CIE) has enabled action to be taken against those who keep a vehicle without insurance. The scheme allows uninsured vehicles to be identified from a comparison of the DVLA’s vehicle register and the Motor Insurance Database managed by the Motor Insurers’ Bureau.

Keepers of vehicles which appear uninsured are sent advisory letters. Those who take no action receive a fixed penalty of £100, followed by enforcement action including prosecution if they remain uninsured.

CIE supplements police powers to seize an uninsured vehicle being used on the road. Police records show that 133,000 vehicles were seized in 2018. Since 2010, Motor Insurers’ Bureau figures show uninsured vehicles had fallen from 1.4 million in 2010 to 1 million by 2016.


Written Question
Shipping: Minimum Wage
Monday 20th January 2020

Asked by: Cat Smith (Labour - Lancaster and Wyre)

Question to the Department for Transport:

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, when he plans to bring forward legislative proposals to extend the application and enforcement of the National Minimum Wage Act 1998 for seafarers.

Answered by Nusrat Ghani

An Order in Council making the legislative changes is expected to be laid in draft before Parliament next month. This will be subject to the affirmative process and debates will be scheduled as the parliamentary timetable permits before final approval is sought from the Privy Council.


Written Question
High Speed 2 Railway Line: Lancaster
Monday 4th March 2019

Asked by: Cat Smith (Labour - Lancaster and Wyre)

Question to the Department for Transport:

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, pursuant to the Answer of 22 February 2019 to Question 221779, High Speed Two: Lancaster, if he will meet (a) the hon. Member for Lancaster and Fleetwood and (b) Lancaster business leaders to discuss High Speed Two.

Answered by Nusrat Ghani

I understand the importance of HS2 to the north west and specifically to Lancaster. As I stated in my recent letter to you, I have asked my officials to set up a meeting to ensure that your concerns are heard.


Written Question
High Speed 2 Railway Line: Lancaster
Friday 22nd February 2019

Asked by: Cat Smith (Labour - Lancaster and Wyre)

Question to the Department for Transport:

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, if he will meet with the Hon. Member for Lancaster and Fleetwood and a delegation of Lancaster business leaders on HS2 and Lancaster.

Answered by Nusrat Ghani

I understand the importance of HS2 serving the North West. Lancaster will be served from Birmingham in the full HS2 Y network in 2033, as per the central case indicative train service specification in the Phase 2 Economic Case published in June 2017. On 12 February, my Written Ministerial Statement informed the House that the second additional provision to the High Speed Rail (West Midlands - Crewe) Bill includes works at and around Crewe station including the extension of platform 5 to accommodate 400-metre HS2 trains. As well as supporting the Crewe hub vision, this could enable direct services between London and Lancaster bringing additional benefits six years earlier in 2027. Work is currently assessing whether it is possible to extend the services and I would be happy to provide an update in due course


Written Question
Railways: North West
Tuesday 30th October 2018

Asked by: Cat Smith (Labour - Lancaster and Wyre)

Question to the Department for Transport:

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, pursuant to Answer of 17 October 2018 to Question 177342 on Railways: North West, if he will publish the public expenditure on railways in each region of the UK between 2013/14 to 2016/17.

Answered by Lord Johnson of Marylebone

Figures on public sector expenditure at a regional level are part of the Government’s Country and Regional Analysis (CRA) statistics. These provide statistical allocations of public spending according to where the benefits of that spend are accrued.

The latest CRA statistics, published by Treasury in November 2017, present data up to 2016-17 and are published at:

https://www.gov.uk/government/collections/country-and-regional-analysis.

The statistics include spend on transport by all public sector organisations including the Department for Transport, Local Authorities, Public Corporations (in the case of transport, this is mainly spend by London Underground) and other Government Departments including devolved administrations.

The most recent statistics up to 2016/17 are presented in the table below. These show total public expenditure on national railways by region, and reflect the levels of both ‘capital’ and ‘current’ (resource) expenditure.

It is important to note however that it is challenging, when talking about a system or network such as the railway, to accurately break down regional spending in a meaningful way.

As a network, where the expenditure takes place on the railway is not always an accurate reflection of where the benefits are felt. An investment in one part of the country may improve the journeys of all the people passing through that area, providing network benefits that, whilst difficult to account for, are spread beyond the immediate region concerned. For example, improvements to the rail network in Birmingham can benefit services all the way from Edinburgh to Penzance.

The life-spans of railway assets also present a challenge when considering the regional spread of infrastructure funding at any single point in time. The 25-40 year lives of some assets naturally mean that there will be a cyclical nature to replacing them that does not lend itself to an even split of funding across all regions within say a five year period. For example whilst a project like Crossrail has recently caused a spike in expenditure concentrated in London during construction, significant enhancement work on the West Coast Main Line was completed towards the end of the 2000s, meaning that further significant spend on that line could be expected to occur not over the past five years but in future periods[MS1] .

Regarding spend in London, London has a substantial number of daily commuters and visitors, both domestically and internationally, who will be using and benefitting from the public transport networks in London but who aren’t residents in London. The unique scale and urban density of London by comparison to other parts of the country also means that it is particularly adapted to large scale public transport networks. Key parts of the rail network serve as international travel ‘hubs’ for the whole of the country. For geographic reasons, many of these are concentrated in London and the South East, for example, the UK's sole rail link to continental Europe (via St Pancras International and the Channel Tunnel[MS2] ).Total annual public sector expenditure on railways (£millions, nominal)

2013/14

2014/15

2015/161

2016/17

East of England

426

557

1,017

883

East Midlands

201

197

444

332

London

3,870

4,149

5,774

6,796

North East

196

185

258

291

North West

893

758

1,476

1,262

South East

702

728

1,395

1,816

South West

215

226

481

750

West Midlands

394

521

932

872

Yorkshire and The Humber

609

391

937

741

Northern Ireland

55

61

82

94

Scotland

965

849

1,045

1,223

Wales

392

427

610

517

Outside UK

72

85

78

103

Total Expenditure

8,992

9,134

14,529

15,681

1Due to the reclassification of Network Rail into the public sector from 2015/16, care should be taken when making historical comparisons.

[MS1]From evidence to the TSC

[MS2]From previous PQs.


Written Question
Railways: North West
Wednesday 17th October 2018

Asked by: Cat Smith (Labour - Lancaster and Wyre)

Question to the Department for Transport:

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, what proportion of the funding allocated to the UK railway network between 2014 and 2019 (a) has been and (b) is planned to be spent in (i) Lancashire and (ii) the North West.

Answered by Lord Johnson of Marylebone

a) Historical spending

Figures on public sector expenditure at a regional level are part of the Government’s Country and Regional Analysis (CRA) statistics. These provide statistical allocations of public spending according to where the benefits of that spend are accrued.

The statistics include spend on transport by all public sector organisations including the Department for Transport, Local Authorities, Public Corporations (in the case of transport, this is mainly spend by London Underground) and other Government Departments including devolved administrations.

This information is available for regions (formerly government office regions) only, and therefore is unavailable for Lancashire.

The most recent statistics up to 2016/17 are presented in the table below. These show total public expenditure on national railways for the North West, and reflect the levels of both ‘capital’ and ‘current’ (resource) expenditure.

Total annual public sector expenditure on railways (£millions, nominal)

2013/14

2014/15

2015/161

2016/17

North West

893

758

1,476

1,262

Total expenditure

8,992

9,134

14,529

15,681

North West as % of total expenditure

10%

8%

10%

8%

1Due to the reclassification of Network Rail into the public sector from 2015/16, care should be taken when making historical comparisons.

b) Future spending

Recent analysis published by the Infrastructure and Projects Authority shows that over the period 2017/18 to 2020/21, the North West will receive £1,353 of central government transport capital expenditure per head of population, the most of all English regions. This publication covers all transport modes, and does not disaggregate further by individual modes. It does not include ‘current’ expenditure or spend by Local Authorities or Public Corporations.

https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/national-infrastructure-and-construction-pipeline-2017 (page 45).


Written Question
M6: Lancashire
Monday 23rd April 2018

Asked by: Cat Smith (Labour - Lancaster and Wyre)

Question to the Department for Transport:

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, if he will instruct Highways England to carry out a survey of the drainage pipes buried in the verges of the M6 where it runs close to Galgate.

Answered by Jesse Norman - Shadow Leader of the House of Commons

This is an operational matter for Highways England.


Written Question
Railways: Lancashire
Tuesday 19th December 2017

Asked by: Cat Smith (Labour - Lancaster and Wyre)

Question to the Department for Transport:

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, pursuant to the Answer of 7 December 2017 to Question 116525, what discussions his Department has had with (a) local authorities and (b) other partners on re-opening the Fleetwood to Poulton-le-Fylde rail line as part of the Government's strategic vision for rail.

Answered by Paul Maynard

As indicated in the Government’s strategic vision for rail, any scheme seeking Government funding will need to demonstrate a strong business case. The Department for Transport will consider proposals on a case by case basis, based on the economic benefits put forward. We stand ready to consider a Strategic Outline Business Case for the re-opening of the Fleetwood to Poulton-le-Fylde rail line put forward by local authorities and other partners.


Written Question
Cycling and Walking Investment Strategy Expert Committee
Thursday 14th December 2017

Asked by: Cat Smith (Labour - Lancaster and Wyre)

Question to the Department for Transport:

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, how many people have been appointed as members of the Cycling and Walking Investment Strategy Expert Committee to date.

Answered by Jesse Norman - Shadow Leader of the House of Commons

Following discussion with various stakeholders, the Department has established a stakeholder advisory group to hold the Government to account for the delivery of the Strategy, and ensure that its cycling and walking policies are informed by regular dialogue with the relevant organisations. This replaces the Cycling and Walking Investment Strategy Expert Committee and this group met for the first time in October 2017, with it due to meet on a quarterly basis. Ministers and officials also continue to engage with a wide range of stakeholders on a regular basis to discuss issues such as the Cycle Safety Review.