Scottish Referendum Legislation: Supreme Court Decision Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate
Department: Scotland Office

Scottish Referendum Legislation: Supreme Court Decision

Carol Monaghan Excerpts
Wednesday 23rd November 2022

(1 year, 12 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Alister Jack Portrait Mr Jack
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I refer the hon. Gentleman to the answer I gave earlier.

Carol Monaghan Portrait Carol Monaghan (Glasgow North West) (SNP)
- Hansard - -

A union, like a marriage, should be based upon equality and consent. It is clear when a marriage has run its course how a partner can extricate themselves from it, but we are yet to find out from the Secretary of State how we can extricate ourselves from this Union.

Alister Jack Portrait Mr Jack
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I believe what we have is a collaborative and constructive partnership, and I think history shows that. I have been very clear: the answer is when there is consensus between the two Governments, across all political parties and civic Scotland. Let us be honest, polling shows that less than a third of Scots want another referendum and, as I said earlier and repeat again, less than a third of the Scottish electorate voted for the Scottish National party last year. When we face all those things and look at people’s priorities in polling, independence is right down the rankings. It is not what they go to bed at night worrying about. They worry about the health system, the education system, crime, drug deaths and whether or not they can get a ferry to their island. That is what they worry about.