Bradley Thomas Alert Sample


Alert Sample

View the Parallel Parliament page for Bradley Thomas

Information between 4th July 2026 - 3rd August 2026

Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.


Division Votes
15 Jul 2026 - Trade Unions - View Vote Context
Bradley Thomas voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 95 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 330 Noes - 109
15 Jul 2026 - Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) - View Vote Context
Bradley Thomas voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 95 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 330 Noes - 109
6 Jul 2026 - National Security (State Threats) Bill - View Vote Context
Bradley Thomas voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 82 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 394 Noes - 85
13 Jul 2026 - Immigration and Asylum Bill - View Vote Context
Bradley Thomas voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 89 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 97 Noes - 358
7 Jul 2026 - Early Release of Prisoners - View Vote Context
Bradley Thomas voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 89 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 115 Noes - 0
8 Jul 2026 - Town and Country Planning - View Vote Context
Bradley Thomas voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 92 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 283 Noes - 182
8 Jul 2026 - Education - View Vote Context
Bradley Thomas voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 92 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 369 Noes - 102
8 Jul 2026 - Health and Safety - View Vote Context
Bradley Thomas voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 93 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 317 Noes - 103
14 Jul 2026 - Public Office (Accountability) Bill - View Vote Context
Bradley Thomas voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 90 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 102 Noes - 409
14 Jul 2026 - Public Office (Accountability) Bill - View Vote Context
Bradley Thomas voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 92 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 104 Noes - 412


Speeches
Bradley Thomas speeches from: Summer Jobs
Bradley Thomas contributed 1 speech (74 words)
Tuesday 7th July 2026 - Commons Chamber
Department for Business, Innovation, Science and Trade


Written Answers
Health Hazards: Chemicals
Asked by: Bradley Thomas (Conservative - Bromsgrove)
Monday 13th July 2026

Question to the Department for Work and Pensions:

To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, (a) what assessments have been carried out on the potential health risks of BPS-coated receipts for workers handling large volumes, including hospitality and retail staff, and (b) what measures are being implemented to ensure these workers are fully protected from these occupational hazards.

Answered by Stephen Timms - Minister of State (Ministry of Housing Communities and Local Government) (Equalities)

The Health and Safety Executive (HSE), in its role as the Agency under the UK Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (UK REACH) Regulation, published an Agency technical report - Bisphenol and bisphenol derivative developers in thermal paper. The report concluded, on the basis of the available hazard data, that Bisphenol S (BPS) is absorbed through the skin to a lesser extent than Bisphenol A (BPA), resulting in a lower overall dose for those handling thermal paper.

A restriction under UK REACH, mirrored across the UK and EU, prohibits the placing on the market of thermal paper containing BPA at concentrations equal to or greater than 0.02% by weight.

Separately, the Control of Substances Hazardous to Health Regulations 2002 (COSHH) place clear duties on employers and the self‑employed to prevent, or where that is not reasonably practicable, to adequately control exposure to substances hazardous to health in the workplace. This requires dutyholders to assess risks, identify potential routes of exposure, and implement proportionate control measures in line with the recognised hierarchy of control, prioritising elimination or substitution with safer alternatives, followed by engineering and organisational controls, and relying on personal protective equipment only as a last resort.

Manufacturers, importers and suppliers also have legal responsibilities to ensure that substances placed on the market are safe when used as intended. This includes identifying hazardous properties, ensuring correct classification, labelling and packaging in accordance with the Classification, Labelling and Packaging (CLP) Regulation, and providing appropriate information to users. This information must include up‑to‑date Safety Data Sheets and clear advice on safe storage, handling, use and emergency measures.

Schools: Temperature
Asked by: Bradley Thomas (Conservative - Bromsgrove)
Monday 13th July 2026

Question to the Department for Education:

To ask the Secretary of State for Education, what steps her department is taking to ensure all schools have the necessary resources to maintain comfortable indoor temperatures during hot weather thereby preventing any disruption to studies.

Answered by Josh MacAlister - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Education)

The department takes periods of hot weather and heatwaves seriously and has published a climate risk assessment here: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/impact-of-uk-climate-change-risk-on-the-delivery-of-education/summary-of-findings-in-relation-to-3-climate-risks-overheating-flooding-and-water-scarcity.

We have published guidance to support education settings during hot weather, drawing on guidance from the UK Health Security Agency, here: https://educationhub.blog.gov.uk/2025/06/hot-weather-and-heatwaves-guidance-for-schools-and-other-education-settings/.

We are improving infrastructure and strengthening resilience across the education estate through our Education Estates Strategy here: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/education-estates-strategy. This includes a new £710 million Renewal and Retrofit Programme to improve condition and climate resilience, investment of almost £3 billion per year by 2034/35 in capital maintenance to improve the condition of the school and college estate, and investment of almost £20 billion through to 2034/35 in the School Rebuilding Programme, delivering climate‑resilient buildings at over 750 schools.

Cancer
Asked by: Bradley Thomas (Conservative - Bromsgrove)
Friday 17th July 2026

Question to the Department of Health and Social Care:

To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, what estimate his Department has made of the number of rare cancer patients unable to access treatment options due to standard NHS funding limitations; what steps he is taking to address treatment barriers, and what steps he is taking to increase funding into rare cancer research.

Answered by Sharon Hodgson

The Government is committed to improving outcomes for rare cancer patients.

Decisions on whether treatments should be routinely available on the National Health Service in England are informed by recommendations from the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE).

The Department continues to take action to improve outcomes for rare cancers patients. This includes taking action to prioritise access to specialist treatment and multidisciplinary teams for rare cancer patients, and a commitment to explore novel procurement routes for diagnostics and treatments for rare cancer.

The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) has a strong track record in supporting access for NHS patients, including patients with rare cancers, to effective new medicines at a price that represents value to the NHS and is fair to companies. As part of the United States and United Kingdom partnership, announced in December 2025, we will be investing approximately 25% more into new innovative, safe, and effective medicines. As part of this arrangement, NICE is now using a new, higher cost-effectiveness threshold for its evaluations of medicines. The higher threshold has already enabled NICE to recommend additional medicines, including for rare cancers, that it would previously have been unlikely to have been able to recommend.

The Department invests approximately £1.8 billion each year in health and care research through the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR). The NIHR welcomes high-quality applications for research into any aspect of human health and care, including rare cancers.

Infected Blood Compensation Scheme
Asked by: Bradley Thomas (Conservative - Bromsgrove)
Friday 17th July 2026

Question to the Cabinet Office:

To ask the Minister for the Cabinet Office, if he will take steps to simplify the Infected Blood Compensation Scheme for bereaved families and ensure that medical records previously reviewed and compensation payments previously made are take into account.

Answered by Nick Thomas-Symonds

The Government recognises that bereaved families and affected people have suffered profound losses. It was clear from the Government consultation, which ended on 22 January, that respondents felt some specific groups of affected people had suffered significant harms and losses, and deserved more compensation in recognition of this. The Infected Blood Compensation Scheme (Amendment) 2026 Regulations introduce a 50% uplift to the core Injury award for some affected people, including eligible bereaved partners and eligible bereaved parents. These regulations were approved by the House of Commons on 6 July.

Regarding medical records, the Government wants the claims process to be as unburdensome to the applicant as possible. The Infected Blood Compensation Authority, or IBCA, who deliver the compensation scheme, ensure that claim managers seek official documentation to support a person’s claim, including from GPs. If a person is registered with an existing support scheme, IBCA will use all this existing information to handle the person’s claim. Someone will only be asked for additional information if there is anything missing that is needed to progress their claim, for example how severe their infection is or when they were diagnosed with their condition.

No past support or ex-gratia payments received through the Infected Blood Support Schemes or Alliance House Organisation schemes will be deducted from the final payments made through the Infected Blood Compensation Scheme (“the Scheme”). Any support payments paid from 1 April 2025 will be taken into account when IBCA calculates the amount of compensation that an infected person is entitled to for the awards relating to their future financial loss and future care costs. Where people have previously received interim compensation payments, these will be deducted from compensation awards through the Scheme. Similarly, any past or future compensation awarded through the courts will be deducted from compensation awards through the Scheme.

Gambling: Software
Asked by: Bradley Thomas (Conservative - Bromsgrove)
Wednesday 8th July 2026

Question to the Department for Digital, Culture, Media & Sport:

To ask the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport, what steps she is taking to stop illegal gambling apps that are using registration; and what support will be put in place for victims of these apps.

Answered by Ian Murray - Minister of State (Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport)

The issue of illegal gambling is a concern for this government. We are committed to working closely with the Gambling Commission to ensure that illegal gambling, in all its forms, is addressed.

As part of the 2025 Budget, the Treasury announced that the Gambling Commission will receive an additional £26 million across three years to increase investment, resources and capacity to tackle the illegal market. In addition, the Crime and Policing Act, which received Royal Assent in April 2026, enables the Commission to apply for new powers to obtain orders to suspend internet protocol addresses and internet domain names linked to illegal gambling. We also launched the Illegal Gambling Taskforce at the beginning of this year which brings together a wide range of stakeholders to take action against the illegal market.

We also recognise the impact that harmful gambling can have on individuals, families and communities and are committed to further strengthening measures to protect those at risk. The statutory gambling levy, established last year, provides independent and sustainable funding for the research, prevention and treatment of gambling-related harm. Approximately 50% of this funding will go to NHS England and Scottish and Welsh Governments to work with providers, including the third sector, to increase access to treatment and support for those experiencing gambling-related harm.




Bradley Thomas - Select Committee Information

Select Committee Documents
Wednesday 8th July 2026
Oral Evidence - Energy Networks Association (ENA), Octopus Energy, E.ON UK, and National Grid

Reviewing the electricity market - Energy Security and Net Zero Committee
Wednesday 8th July 2026
Oral Evidence - NESO, Elexon, and Flexitricity

Reviewing the electricity market - Energy Security and Net Zero Committee
Tuesday 21st July 2026
Correspondence - Correspondence from the Chair to James Purnell, Chief of Staff relating to the current governmental structures for the delivery of net zero, dated 21 July 2026

Energy Security and Net Zero Committee
Wednesday 8th July 2026
Oral Evidence - Department for Energy Security and Net Zero, Department for Energy Security and Net Zero, and Department for Energy Security and Net Zero

International climate policy - Energy Security and Net Zero Committee
Wednesday 8th July 2026
Oral Evidence - Carbon Tracker, the Grantham Institute at Imperial College London, E3G, and Chatham House

International climate policy - Energy Security and Net Zero Committee
Wednesday 1st July 2026
Oral Evidence - Aberdeen & Grampian Chamber of Commerce, Prospect, and Aberdeen Cyrenians

Managing the future of UK oil and gas - Energy Security and Net Zero Committee
Wednesday 1st July 2026
Oral Evidence - OPITO Ltd, North East Scotland College, and Robert Gordon University

Managing the future of UK oil and gas - Energy Security and Net Zero Committee
Wednesday 8th July 2026
Written Evidence - Met Office Hadley Centre
ICP0070 - International climate policy

International climate policy - Energy Security and Net Zero Committee
Wednesday 8th July 2026
Written Evidence - University of Birmingham
ICP0071 - International climate policy

International climate policy - Energy Security and Net Zero Committee
Wednesday 15th July 2026
Written Evidence - Fuels Industry UK
MAN0064 - Managing the future of UK oil and gas

Managing the future of UK oil and gas - Energy Security and Net Zero Committee
Tuesday 4th August 2026
Correspondence - Correspondence from CWP Energy to the Chair relating to the Eskdalemuir Seismic Array Consultation, dated 2 July 2026

Energy Security and Net Zero Committee
Tuesday 4th August 2026
Correspondence - Correspondence from the Chair to the Secretary of State relating to the Eskdalemuir Seismic Array Consultation, dated 30 July 2026

Energy Security and Net Zero Committee


Select Committee Inquiry
17 Jul 2026
Business and energy
Energy Security and Net Zero Committee (Select)
Not accepting submissions

Energy support and decarbonisation funding for the chemicals and ceramics sectors was an encouraging sign that Government recognises a central challenge for industry: decarbonisation and electricity prices go hand in hand. It offers a potential model for future targeted support by linking help with energy costs to incentives for cleaner production. However, it also highlights the absence of a broader strategic framework for industrial decarbonisation/electrification across manufacturing. Current support remains uneven.  

  • The new BICS scheme is not designed to drive electrification and decarbonisation and may be better understood as short-term relief.  
  • The EII Supercharger also provides important relief for some energy-intensive industries, but many manufacturers remain outside its scope.  

This is particularly concerning given the continued uncertainty around the long-awaited Industrial Decarbonisation Strategy, which remains unpublished and may not provide the clarity or scope industry needs. 

Small and Medium-sized Enterprises (SMEs) account for 99% of the business population in the UK and over a third of the UK’s greenhouse gas emissions. Rising cost pressures are increasingly limiting SME’s ability to drive growth in local economies and contribute to the UK’s net‑zero transition. Many firms are postponing or scaling back green investment, and NatWest’s latest growth tracker shows that only 30% of firms consider sustainability a high priority, the lowest since early 2020. 

17 Jul 2026
Warm and comfortable homes
Energy Security and Net Zero Committee (Select)
Not accepting submissions

The government will establish a Warm Homes Agency (WHA) – a dedicated public body to support the delivery of the Warm Homes Plan, and guide consumers through the transition. It will consolidate Salix, relevant DESNZ functions, and parts of Ofgem and work at both a national and local level (subject to agreement with the devolved governments). 

There will be strategic, area-based coordination so that the electricity grid can keep pace with electrification and the rollout of clean technologies. This involves increased planning at a local level, bringing together DNOs, local authorities, strategic mayoral authorities, and other local/regional stakeholders (energy suppliers, housing associations, community energy groups etc).  

The Plan indicates that the Government considers home upgrades to be the best tool to fight fuel poverty and lower bills. The existing retrofit system is too complex, fragmented, and inconsistent, which leads to poor consumer experiences (including the recent case with ECO). The Government says that it will simplify certification structures, strengthen accountability, and consider moving oversight under closer government control and the WHA. 

From 2027 the WHA will provide impartial advice and clear information (online and by phone) on home upgrades to consumers in partnership with the private sector and third party advice sector. Services will be integrated with local advice providers to reach harder‑to‑engage communities. 

24 Jul 2026
National Planning Policy Statement on Nuclear Fusion
Energy Security and Net Zero Committee (Select)

Submit Evidence (by 28 Aug 2026)


Nuclear fusion is the process that powers the Sun, and for decades humans have been working towards harnessing its remarkable, "clean" power.  

Now the UK Government has determined that the technology has advanced sufficiently to warrant introducing planning legislation that will facilitate the development of prototypes and demonstrator facilities. 

The Government has made an initial consultation the need for a framework on how proposals for such facilities should be developed. There is a need for regulatory clarity, and that regulation must cover whichever fusion technology is being employed, for whichever output, thermal or electrical.   

On 8 June 2026 the Government put forward its proposal EN-8, a national policy planning statement for the generation of fusion energy. 

Consultation and scrutiny of EN-8 

The National Policy Statement for Nuclear Energy Generation (EN-8) has been put forward to help guide planners as they seek to make decisions on siting new nuclear fusion infrastructure.   

Under the Planning Act 2008, a National Policy Statement (NPS) like EN-8 must undergo public consultation and parliamentary scrutiny before it can be formally designated.   

The full draft text of EN-8 is currently under consultation by the Government and the Committee is beginning the parliamentary scrutiny process, offering industry, experts, and the public the opportunity to comment as it examines the implications of the framework set out in EN-8.   

What is EN-8?  

EN-8 is intended to become the principal guide for decisions on nuclear fusion power stations in England and Wales.  

Nuclear fission infrastructure is regulated under EN-7, supporting development of nuclear technologies like Small Modular Reactors and Advanced Modular Reactors and traditional gigawatt-scale plants.  The significant difference in technology means that the Government intends for nuclear fusion to be managed entirely separately from nuclear fission. 

The aim is to create clarity, allowing interested investors and developers to have more confidence in bringing forward projects that will result in fusion energy contributing to the grid by 2040.  The draft EN-8 focuses on environmental, safety & security, operational and developmental themes with detailed requirements for developers and the Planning Inspectorate in these areas. 

The Government has indicated that the Committee process must be complete by 30 November.