Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces Treaty Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate
Department: Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office

Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces Treaty

Bob Stewart Excerpts
Monday 4th February 2019

(5 years, 9 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Mark Field Portrait Mark Field
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I thank the hon. Gentleman for his brave words, and I agree entirely, but that makes it all the more important that we continue to work with the international community. The UN is the obvious vehicle for doing that, but we recognise that the Russians would veto a Security Council resolution, so we are working to build a coalition of interests among many UN members, both those directly impacted and others who, if we do not deal with this now, could be impacted in the decades to come.

Bob Stewart Portrait Bob Stewart (Beckenham) (Con)
- Hansard - -

Everyone agrees that we should get Russia back within the provisions of the INF treaty. Intermediate range means up to 5,500 metres. Will the Minister confirm that the INF treaty does not include sea or air-launched missiles, which would be sad if it did?

Mark Field Portrait Mark Field
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I believe that is correct. If I am incorrect, I will correct it in writing to my hon. Friend, but I believe he is correct.