Oral Answers to Questions Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate

Ben Bradshaw

Main Page: Ben Bradshaw (Labour - Exeter)

Oral Answers to Questions

Ben Bradshaw Excerpts
Thursday 11th November 2010

(14 years, 1 month ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
Lord Barker of Battle Portrait Gregory Barker
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

There is a lot of interest in geothermal, which is a very exciting technology with much potential. I have had several representations, not least from my hon. Friend, who is a great champion of this new technology. I am working with my officials to see how we can ensure that geothermal is fully exploited in the UK.

Ben Bradshaw Portrait Mr Ben Bradshaw (Exeter) (Lab)
- Hansard - -

11. What assessment he has made of the effects on local employment levels of his decision not to pursue tidal technologies in the Severn estuary.

Charles Hendry Portrait The Minister of State, Department of Energy and Climate Change (Charles Hendry)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

A Severn tidal power scheme could create jobs in Wales and south-west England during construction and operation. However, it could also cause job losses in the Severn estuary’s ports, fishing and aggregate extraction industries. We are talking to interested private sector developers and remain absolutely committed to supporting the growth of a successful UK tidal energy sector.

Ben Bradshaw Portrait Mr Bradshaw
- Hansard - -

Is it not extraordinary that the Energy and Climate Change Secretary can go from being anti to pro-nuclear in a matter of days, yet abandon tidal power for Britain? The Severn estuary has the potential to create 5% of our energy needs and create 100,000 jobs. How does that square with the Prime Minister’s promise to put tidal energy at the top of his so-called green agenda?

Charles Hendry Portrait Charles Hendry
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

The right hon. Gentleman put it correctly in his own blog, when he said:

“In an ideal world, we would all like to see the scheme that has the potential to provide the maximum amount of renewable energy and the least environmental impact in other ways”.

But that might not be possible. We have looked at the costs, the environmental consequences, the benefits it would bring, the alternative schemes and the resulting diversion of capital, and we have decided that other tidal mechanisms would be better.