To match an exact phrase, use quotation marks around the search term. eg. "Parliamentary Estate". Use "OR" or "AND" as link words to form more complex queries.


Keep yourself up-to-date with the latest developments by exploring our subscription options to receive notifications direct to your inbox

Written Question
Employment Tribunals Service: Disclosure of Information
Wednesday 13th November 2024

Asked by: Bell Ribeiro-Addy (Labour - Clapham and Brixton Hill)

Question to the Ministry of Justice:

To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, what assessment she has made of the potential impact of naming parties involved in employment tribunal cases on those people; and if she will make an assessment of the potential merits granting anonymity to parties involved in employment tribunal cases by default.

Answered by Heidi Alexander - Minister of State (Ministry of Justice)

The Employment Tribunals Act 1996 and the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 (“the Rules”) govern how cases are handled in employment tribunals. Orders for anonymity are primarily governed by rule 50 of the Rules. This provides the employment tribunals the power to make an order restricting or preventing the disclosure of any aspect of proceedings, this may include an order that a party’s identity should not be disclosed to the public. Employment tribunals may only make such an order, where it is ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ and having regard to the principle of open justice and to the Convention right to freedom of expression. As such, the question of whether such an order should be granted is a judicial decision balancing the interests of justice with the need for transparency, and is taken on a case-by case basis.


Written Question
Afghanistan: Human Rights
Wednesday 13th November 2024

Asked by: Bell Ribeiro-Addy (Labour - Clapham and Brixton Hill)

Question to the Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office:

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Affairs, whether his department has plans to increase funding for (a) NGOs and (b) human rights defenders operating in Afghanistan who are promoting the human rights of (i) women, (ii) girls, (iii) LGBTQ+ people and (iv) religious and (v)non-religious minorities.

Answered by Hamish Falconer - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office)

Ministers are reviewing the FCDO's Official Development Assistance (ODA) budget to ensure it delivers on our priorities. We are committed to transparency and will publish ODA allocations for 2024-25. We are planning £161 million in aid this financial year (2024-25), with 50 per cent targeted for women and girls. UK funding supports several NGOs who promote human rights in Afghanistan, including those of women and minorities. We also contribute to an Afghanistan Resilience Trust Fund project that supports civil society, particularly women-led organisations.


Speech in Westminster Hall - Wed 13 Nov 2024
Facial Recognition: Police Use

Speech Link

View all Bell Ribeiro-Addy (Lab - Clapham and Brixton Hill) contributions to the debate on: Facial Recognition: Police Use

Speech in Westminster Hall - Wed 13 Nov 2024
Facial Recognition: Police Use

Speech Link

View all Bell Ribeiro-Addy (Lab - Clapham and Brixton Hill) contributions to the debate on: Facial Recognition: Police Use

Division Vote (Commons)
12 Nov 2024 - House of Lords (Hereditary Peers) Bill - View Vote Context
Bell Ribeiro-Addy (Lab) voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 340 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 435 Noes - 73
Division Vote (Commons)
12 Nov 2024 - House of Lords (Hereditary Peers) Bill - View Vote Context
Bell Ribeiro-Addy (Lab) voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 344 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 98 Noes - 375
Division Vote (Commons)
12 Nov 2024 - House of Lords (Hereditary Peers) Bill - View Vote Context
Bell Ribeiro-Addy (Lab) voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 343 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 93 Noes - 355
Division Vote (Commons)
12 Nov 2024 - House of Lords (Hereditary Peers) Bill - View Vote Context
Bell Ribeiro-Addy (Lab) voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 344 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 98 Noes - 376
Division Vote (Commons)
12 Nov 2024 - House of Lords (Hereditary Peers) Bill - View Vote Context
Bell Ribeiro-Addy (Lab) voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 342 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 41 Noes - 378
Written Question
British Indian Ocean Territory: Sovereignty
Friday 8th November 2024

Asked by: Bell Ribeiro-Addy (Labour - Clapham and Brixton Hill)

Question to the Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office:

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Affairs, whether the treaty on the transfer of sovereignty of the Chagos Islands to Mauritius will guarantee Chagossians (a) the right to return to the outer islands, (b) restitution of the islands and (ci) an independent award of compensation after consultation with the Chagossian people.

Answered by Stephen Doughty - Minister of State (Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office)

We recognise the importance of the Chagos Archipelago to Chagossians and have worked to ensure the agreement with Mauritius reflects their interests. Under the terms of the agreement, Mauritius will be free to implement a programme of resettlement on the islands, other than Diego Garcia, and we will finance a new trust fund for Mauritius in support of Chagossians. Separate to the agreement, we will increase our support to Chagossians in the UK and will work with Mauritius to restart visits to the islands at the earliest opportunity, including Diego Garcia, for Chagossians.