Information between 8th June 2025 - 28th June 2025
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.
Division Votes |
---|
9 Jun 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context Becky Gittins voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 298 Labour No votes vs 15 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 180 Noes - 307 |
9 Jun 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context Becky Gittins voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 317 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 73 Noes - 323 |
9 Jun 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context Becky Gittins voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 326 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 167 Noes - 334 |
9 Jun 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context Becky Gittins voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 326 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 113 Noes - 335 |
10 Jun 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context Becky Gittins voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 304 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 306 Noes - 174 |
10 Jun 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context Becky Gittins voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 299 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 107 Noes - 314 |
10 Jun 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context Becky Gittins voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 301 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 73 Noes - 312 |
10 Jun 2025 - Data (Use and Access) Bill [Lords] - View Vote Context Becky Gittins voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 300 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 304 Noes - 189 |
10 Jun 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context Becky Gittins voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 301 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 78 Noes - 309 |
11 Jun 2025 - Electricity - View Vote Context Becky Gittins voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 344 Labour Aye votes vs 1 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 350 Noes - 176 |
13 Jun 2025 - Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill - View Vote Context Becky Gittins voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 184 Labour No votes vs 122 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 230 Noes - 256 |
13 Jun 2025 - Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill - View Vote Context Becky Gittins voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 163 Labour No votes vs 136 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 259 Noes - 216 |
13 Jun 2025 - Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill - View Vote Context Becky Gittins voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 181 Labour No votes vs 124 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 233 Noes - 254 |
17 Jun 2025 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context Becky Gittins voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 325 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 184 Noes - 336 |
17 Jun 2025 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context Becky Gittins voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 325 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 189 Noes - 328 |
17 Jun 2025 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context Becky Gittins voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 293 Labour No votes vs 14 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 117 Noes - 379 |
17 Jun 2025 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context Becky Gittins voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 291 Labour Aye votes vs 25 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 379 Noes - 137 |
17 Jun 2025 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context Becky Gittins voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 317 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 89 Noes - 428 |
17 Jun 2025 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context Becky Gittins voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 326 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 194 Noes - 335 |
18 Jun 2025 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context Becky Gittins voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 304 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 114 Noes - 310 |
18 Jun 2025 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context Becky Gittins voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 302 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 312 Noes - 95 |
18 Jun 2025 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context Becky Gittins voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 306 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 178 Noes - 313 |
18 Jun 2025 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context Becky Gittins voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 306 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 102 Noes - 390 |
18 Jun 2025 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context Becky Gittins voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 304 Labour No votes vs 3 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 178 Noes - 313 |
18 Jun 2025 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context Becky Gittins voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 299 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 147 Noes - 305 |
20 Jun 2025 - Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill - View Vote Context Becky Gittins voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 224 Labour Aye votes vs 160 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 314 Noes - 291 |
20 Jun 2025 - Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill - View Vote Context Becky Gittins voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 185 Labour No votes vs 113 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 208 Noes - 261 |
20 Jun 2025 - Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill - View Vote Context Becky Gittins voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 199 Labour Aye votes vs 114 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 275 Noes - 209 |
20 Jun 2025 - Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill - View Vote Context Becky Gittins voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 186 Labour No votes vs 122 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 213 Noes - 266 |
20 Jun 2025 - Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill - View Vote Context Becky Gittins voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 190 Labour No votes vs 125 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 223 Noes - 269 |
20 Jun 2025 - Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill - View Vote Context Becky Gittins voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 198 Labour Aye votes vs 122 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 274 Noes - 224 |
Speeches |
---|
Becky Gittins speeches from: Business of the House
Becky Gittins contributed 1 speech (86 words) Thursday 19th June 2025 - Commons Chamber Leader of the House |
Becky Gittins speeches from: Oral Answers to Questions
Becky Gittins contributed 3 speeches (195 words) Tuesday 10th June 2025 - Commons Chamber Department for Energy Security & Net Zero |
Written Answers |
---|
Pensions: British Nationals Abroad
Asked by: Becky Gittins (Labour - Clwyd East) Wednesday 11th June 2025 Question to the HM Treasury: To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, if she will commission a review into the Financial Conduct Authority’s handling of historic pension transfer cases involving qualifying recognised overseas pension schemes. Answered by Torsten Bell - Parliamentary Secretary (HM Treasury) There are no plans to commission a review into the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) related to qualifying recognised overseas pension schemes (QROPS).
A QROPS is the name for any pension scheme located outside the UK which meets the criteria to receive transfers of UK tax relieved pension savings.
Those overseas schemes are required to be regulated by a pensions regulator in the overseas country where they are established in order for them to receive UK tax relieved pensions. |
Dogs: Tagging
Asked by: Becky Gittins (Labour - Clwyd East) Thursday 12th June 2025 Question to the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs: To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, what assessment he has made of the adequacy of the microchipping database system in reuniting dogs with their owners. Answered by Daniel Zeichner - Minister of State (Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs) Pet microchipping policy is a devolved matter. In 2021, Defra carried out a post implementation review of the Microchipping of Dogs (England) Regulations 2015. This review concluded that microchipping had had a positive effect on reunification rates and was identified as a leading means of reunification. |
Animal Welfare
Asked by: Becky Gittins (Labour - Clwyd East) Thursday 12th June 2025 Question to the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs: To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, when he will publish the animal welfare strategy. Answered by Daniel Zeichner - Minister of State (Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs) This Government was elected on a mandate to introduce the most ambitious plans to improve animal welfare in a generation. The Prime Minister announced that we will be publishing an animal welfare strategy later this year. |
Pets: Sales
Asked by: Becky Gittins (Labour - Clwyd East) Thursday 12th June 2025 Question to the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs: To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, what steps his Department is taking to regulate online pet sales. Answered by Daniel Zeichner - Minister of State (Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs) Defra endorses the Pet Advertising Advisory Group (PAAG) to combat growing concerns regarding the irresponsible advertising of pets for sale, rehoming, and exchange. Defra have backed a set of Advertising Standards that PAAG developed which several of the UK’s largest classified websites have agreed to meet.
Under current regulations, anyone who is in the business of selling animals as pets or breeding and selling dogs needs a valid licence from their local authority. Licensees must meet strict statutory minimum welfare standards which are enforced by local authorities. Any licensee advertising animals for sale must list certain details in the advert, including their licence number and the local authority which issued the licence. |
APPG Publications |
---|
Social Science and Policy APPG Document: Local Election Analysis May 2025 Minutes of Meeting Found: Baroness Morris, Lord Rooker, Baroness Tyler, Lord Wallace, Baroness Young, Lorraine Beavers MP, Becky Gittins |
Social Science and Policy APPG Document: Local Election Analysis May 2025 Found: Baroness Morris, Lord Rooker, Baroness Tyler, Lord Wallace, Baroness Young, Lorraine Beavers MP, Becky Gittins |
Future of Financial Services APPG Document: 24-10-08-APPG-on-Future-Of-Financial-Services-Membership-List Found: Becky Gittins MP (Lab, Clwyd East) 24. |
Hospitality and Tourism APPG Document: APPG Budget evidence session minutes - 9 September 2024 Found: Parliamentarians Ann Davies Plaid Cymru Caerfyrddin Bayo Alaba Labour Southend East and Rochford Becky Gittins |