Becky Gittins Alert Sample


Alert Sample

View the Parallel Parliament page for Becky Gittins

Information between 14th November 2024 - 4th December 2024

Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.


Division Votes
19 Nov 2024 - Passenger Railway Services (Public Ownership) Bill - View Vote Context
Becky Gittins voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 324 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 350 Noes - 108
19 Nov 2024 - Passenger Railway Services (Public Ownership) Bill - View Vote Context
Becky Gittins voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 320 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 344 Noes - 172
27 Nov 2024 - Finance Bill - View Vote Context
Becky Gittins voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 319 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 332 Noes - 176
27 Nov 2024 - Finance Bill - View Vote Context
Becky Gittins voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 320 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 112 Noes - 333
25 Nov 2024 - Non-Domestic Rating (Multipliers and Private Schools) Bill - View Vote Context
Becky Gittins voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 319 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 336 Noes - 175
25 Nov 2024 - Non-Domestic Rating (Multipliers and Private Schools) Bill - View Vote Context
Becky Gittins voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 320 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 173 Noes - 335
26 Nov 2024 - Tobacco and Vapes Bill - View Vote Context
Becky Gittins voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 317 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 415 Noes - 47
29 Nov 2024 - Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill - View Vote Context
Becky Gittins voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 234 Labour Aye votes vs 147 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 330 Noes - 275
3 Dec 2024 - National Insurance Contributions (Secondary Class 1 Contributions) Bill - View Vote Context
Becky Gittins voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 324 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 332 Noes - 189
3 Dec 2024 - National Insurance Contributions (Secondary Class 1 Contributions) Bill - View Vote Context
Becky Gittins voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 322 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 186 Noes - 330


Speeches
Becky Gittins speeches from: Oral Answers to Questions
Becky Gittins contributed 2 speeches (125 words)
Monday 25th November 2024 - Commons Chamber
Home Office
Becky Gittins speeches from: Speaker’s Statement
Becky Gittins contributed 1 speech (230 words)
Monday 25th November 2024 - Commons Chamber
Cabinet Office
Becky Gittins speeches from: Infected Blood Inquiry
Becky Gittins contributed 1 speech (77 words)
Tuesday 19th November 2024 - Commons Chamber
Department of Health and Social Care


Written Answers
Intimate Image Abuse: Internet
Asked by: Becky Gittins (Labour - Clwyd East)
Wednesday 20th November 2024

Question to the Department for Science, Innovation & Technology:

To ask the Secretary of State for Science, Innovation and Technology, what steps he is taking to tackle intimate image abuse online.

Answered by Feryal Clark - Parliamentary Under Secretary of State (Department for Science, Innovation and Technology)

Tackling intimate image abuse, and violence against women and girls, is a priority for this government.

We made changes to the Online Safety Act to strengthen online platforms’ duties for intimate image abuse.

These broadened the scope of intimate image abuse that providers need to address under the Act.

The Government’s manifesto included a commitment to ban the creation of sexually explicit deepfakes. We are working to identify the most appropriate legislative vehicle for this change.