Housing (Scotland) Act 2010 (Consequential Provisions and Modifications) Order 2012 Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate
Department: Leader of the House

Housing (Scotland) Act 2010 (Consequential Provisions and Modifications) Order 2012

Baroness Symons of Vernham Dean Excerpts
Thursday 2nd February 2012

(12 years, 9 months ago)

Lords Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Lord Lawson of Blaby Portrait Lord Lawson of Blaby
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

My Lords, I support very strongly my noble friend Lord Newton's point. While the House of Commons is perfectly entitled to claim privilege, it is not compelled to do so. The constitution of this country operates by conventions. It is one of the conventions of the constitution that this is evoked very sparingly and on rare occasions. For it to be invoked promiscuously is completely contrary to the conventions of the constitution. This raises serious issues and the House of Commons would be wise to think again.

Baroness Symons of Vernham Dean Portrait Baroness Symons of Vernham Dean
- Hansard - -

My Lords, I support what the noble Lord, Lord Lawson, has just said and revert to the Cunningham committee report, which was very clear on the question of conventions developing and changing over a period of time. It specifically addressed whether the conventions should be codified and decided that that was not helpful to the way in which Parliament operates, but that conventions could develop. The Leader of the House quoted only part of the Cunningham report and not the point in its entirety.