London Local Authorities Bill [Lords] Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate

Baroness Primarolo

Main Page: Baroness Primarolo (Labour - Life peer)

London Local Authorities Bill [Lords]

Baroness Primarolo Excerpts
Tuesday 21st February 2012

(12 years, 9 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
Peter Bottomley Portrait Sir Peter Bottomley
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

On a point of order, Madam Deputy Speaker. There are times in Committee when an amendment has been discussed at length and then the Chair can decide that there has been sufficient debate on the issues and the question is put. Would it be acceptable to move that the question now be put that the Bill be read a third time, on the grounds that during the discussions on the various amendments we have had sufficient discussion of the purpose of the Bill, and if so, may I move that the question now be put?

Baroness Primarolo Portrait Madam Deputy Speaker (Dawn Primarolo)
- Hansard - -

No. It would not be proper, and no, the Question cannot be put, as a second point of order.

Christopher Chope Portrait Mr Chope
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

That was an unnecessarily impertinent and provocative intervention by my hon. Friend.

As we were deprived of a speech from the Minister on the last group of amendments on Report and because the Government abstained from the vote on clause 9, everybody is gagging to hear from the Minister what the Government’s approach is to the full contents of the Bill, now that it has been amended. When we reflect on what has happened this evening, we will inevitably regret that we did not hear from the Minister, who has been sitting in his place for the best part of three hours and who, from my recollection, has not uttered a word.