Procedure of the House (Proposal 4) Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate

Baroness Noakes

Main Page: Baroness Noakes (Conservative - Life peer)

Procedure of the House (Proposal 4)

Baroness Noakes Excerpts
Tuesday 8th November 2011

(13 years ago)

Lords Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
Lord Brabazon of Tara Portrait The Chairman of Committees
- Hansard - - - Excerpts



To resolve that the following new guidance be added to the Companion to the Standing Orders: “Members should not take up the time of the House during question time by making trivial declarations of non-financial and non-registrable interests. Questioners should not thank the Government for its answers, nor ministers thank questioners for their questions.”

Baroness Noakes Portrait Baroness Noakes
- Hansard - -

My Lords, I have one point to raise in connection with this, which comes back to courtesy in the House and which ran through the debates on the first proposal. If Members of this House were more courteous to each other, we would not have the problems that are perceived during Question Time. Often in Question Time, Ministers do not give Answers that merit any thanks whatever, but occasionally they give extremely helpful Answers. It seems to me that it would be improper that the Companion should debar the questioner from thanking the Minister for a useful Answer. While I am all in favour of stopping the ritual of thanking for Questions and Answers, the way in which this has now been expressed is wrong because it debars Members of the House from normal courtesy.

Baroness Farrington of Ribbleton Portrait Baroness Farrington of Ribbleton
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

My Lords, I will make just a brief observation. Occasionally, the length of the reply does not assist the person who asked the Question but is an attempt to prevent their answering it.