United Kingdom Internal Market Bill Debate
Full Debate: Read Full DebateBaroness Henig
Main Page: Baroness Henig (Labour - Life peer)Department Debates - View all Baroness Henig's debates with the Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy
(3 years, 11 months ago)
Lords ChamberI should inform the House that, if Amendment 31 is agreed to, I cannot call Amendments 32 to 35.
Clause 17: Services: exclusions
Amendment 31
Amendment 34 has also been pre-empted.
Amendment 34
No, you cannot; it has been pre-empted by Amendment 31. I am sorry.
I think the agreement is that it will stand in its place anyway.
My advice was that, if Amendment 31 was agreed to, Amendments 32 to 35 would have been pre-empted. That was certainly the legal advice that I read out right at the beginning.
The issue is that, although the regulations have been taken out—as with my Amendments 15 and 20 that have already gone before, and indeed Amendment 19 in the name of the Minister—the agreement was that the way we deal with them would nevertheless stand. That is why Amendments 15, 19, 20 and 27 were all allowed.
If it has been pre-empted, may I suggest that we vote on it? I gather that the Government will not resist, and I am sure that the clerks can then disallow it should they find that we should not have done it. I beg to move.
We come to the group beginning with Amendment 37. I remind noble Lords that Members other than the mover and the Minister may speak only once and that short questions of elucidation are discouraged. Anyone wishing to press this or any other amendment in this group to a Division should make that clear in debate.
Schedule 2: Services exclusions
“Teaching Services | provision of teaching services in schools or colleges” |