European Union (Withdrawal) Bill Debate
Full Debate: Read Full DebateBaroness Goldie
Main Page: Baroness Goldie (Conservative - Life peer)Department Debates - View all Baroness Goldie's debates with the Department for Exiting the European Union
(6 years, 7 months ago)
Lords ChamberThat this House do not insist on its Amendment 43, to which the Commons have disagreed for their Reason 43A.
That this House do not insist on its Amendment 45, to which the Commons have disagreed for their Reason 45A.
That this House do not insist on its Amendment 52, to which the Commons have disagreed for their Reason 52A.
That this House do not insist on its Amendment 53 and do agree with the Commons in their Amendment 53A in lieu.
The noble Lord’s eloquence is very diverting, but will he please speak to the Motion under consideration?
I started by welcoming what the Leader of the House said about the sifting committee and defending the role of this House and ensuring that this House plays its role. That is welcome language. We have not heard enough of it from the Government. We should all be worried about the potential deterioration of this debate. I wish merely to underline that the debate has got nasty on both sides. One MP was killed two years ago. Let us recognise that the current violent language may take us that far.
In the way in which we approach our task over the next six months, we will do our bit on the detail. I very much hope that the Leader will assure us that the Government will, all the way through, respect the appropriate constitutional role of this and the other House in dealing with a matter which is not simply decided by the referendum, because there is so much detail in it, and the detail always matters.