Royal Mail: Universal Postal Service Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate

Baroness D'Souza

Main Page: Baroness D'Souza (Crossbench - Life peer)

Royal Mail: Universal Postal Service

Baroness D'Souza Excerpts
Thursday 19th June 2014

(10 years, 5 months ago)

Lords Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
Viscount Younger of Leckie Portrait Viscount Younger of Leckie
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

The noble Lord is correct: this is a matter for Ofcom. The Government’s policy on competition in the UK postal services market is clear: although competition can bring benefits to consumers, it should not undermine the provision of the universal postal service. That is why the Government have ensured that Ofcom’s primary statutory duty is to secure the ongoing provision of the universal service. However, should competition threaten the universal service, the Act is clear that securing the universal service must take precedence.

Baroness D'Souza Portrait The Lord Speaker (Baroness D'Souza)
- Hansard - -

I hesitate to interrupt the proceedings but I am having difficulty in following them due to the continuing conversations coming from the Benches on my left.

Lord Deben Portrait Lord Deben (Con)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

Does my noble friend accept that those of us who live in the country are particularly at risk should there be any diminution in the strength of the universal postal service? However, could we not be encouraged to take on board the practice adopted on the continent and in America—namely, to situate post boxes at the end of driveways? That is environmentally very friendly and entails a huge cost saving.