Baroness D'Souza Alert Sample


Alert Sample

View the Parallel Parliament page for Baroness D'Souza

Information between 10th March 2025 - 9th April 2025

Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.


Division Votes
26 Mar 2025 - Non-Domestic Rating (Multipliers and Private Schools) Bill) - View Vote Context
Baroness D'Souza voted Aye and in line with the House
One of 19 Crossbench Aye votes vs 18 Crossbench No votes
Tally: Ayes - 277 Noes - 162
26 Mar 2025 - Non-Domestic Rating (Multipliers and Private Schools) Bill) - View Vote Context
Baroness D'Souza voted No and against the House
One of 25 Crossbench No votes vs 17 Crossbench Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 277 Noes - 172
26 Mar 2025 - Non-Domestic Rating (Multipliers and Private Schools) Bill) - View Vote Context
Baroness D'Souza voted No and against the House
One of 22 Crossbench No votes vs 19 Crossbench Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 278 Noes - 165
31 Mar 2025 - Mental Health Bill [HL] - View Vote Context
Baroness D'Souza voted Aye and in line with the House
One of 22 Crossbench Aye votes vs 7 Crossbench No votes
Tally: Ayes - 272 Noes - 157
31 Mar 2025 - Mental Health Bill [HL] - View Vote Context
Baroness D'Souza voted No and against the House
One of 12 Crossbench No votes vs 19 Crossbench Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 223 Noes - 157
24 Mar 2025 - National Insurance Contributions (Secondary Class 1 Contributions) Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness D'Souza voted Aye and in line with the House
One of 26 Crossbench Aye votes vs 14 Crossbench No votes
Tally: Ayes - 273 Noes - 172
24 Mar 2025 - National Insurance Contributions (Secondary Class 1 Contributions) Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness D'Souza voted Aye and in line with the House
One of 30 Crossbench Aye votes vs 13 Crossbench No votes
Tally: Ayes - 276 Noes - 165
24 Mar 2025 - National Insurance Contributions (Secondary Class 1 Contributions) Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness D'Souza voted Aye and in line with the House
One of 31 Crossbench Aye votes vs 14 Crossbench No votes
Tally: Ayes - 271 Noes - 173
18 Mar 2025 - Non-Domestic Rating (Multipliers and Private Schools) Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness D'Souza voted Aye and in line with the House
One of 25 Crossbench Aye votes vs 17 Crossbench No votes
Tally: Ayes - 283 Noes - 177
18 Mar 2025 - Non-Domestic Rating (Multipliers and Private Schools) Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness D'Souza voted No and against the House
One of 20 Crossbench No votes vs 15 Crossbench Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 271 Noes - 179
17 Mar 2025 - Football Governance Bill [HL] - View Vote Context
Baroness D'Souza voted Aye and against the House
One of 15 Crossbench Aye votes vs 17 Crossbench No votes
Tally: Ayes - 74 Noes - 339
17 Mar 2025 - Football Governance Bill [HL] - View Vote Context
Baroness D'Souza voted No and in line with the House
One of 31 Crossbench No votes vs 5 Crossbench Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 182 Noes - 237
17 Mar 2025 - Football Governance Bill [HL] - View Vote Context
Baroness D'Souza voted No and in line with the House
One of 6 Crossbench No votes vs 17 Crossbench Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 175 Noes - 207
11 Mar 2025 - Football Governance Bill [HL] - View Vote Context
Baroness D'Souza voted No and in line with the House
One of 29 Crossbench No votes vs 4 Crossbench Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 203 Noes - 257
11 Mar 2025 - Football Governance Bill [HL] - View Vote Context
Baroness D'Souza voted Aye and against the House
One of 13 Crossbench Aye votes vs 35 Crossbench No votes
Tally: Ayes - 224 Noes - 267
2 Apr 2025 - Bus Services (No. 2) Bill [HL] - View Vote Context
Baroness D'Souza voted Aye and in line with the House
One of 16 Crossbench Aye votes vs 7 Crossbench No votes
Tally: Ayes - 240 Noes - 148
2 Apr 2025 - Bus Services (No. 2) Bill [HL] - View Vote Context
Baroness D'Souza voted Aye and in line with the House
One of 13 Crossbench Aye votes vs 11 Crossbench No votes
Tally: Ayes - 242 Noes - 157
2 Apr 2025 - Bus Services (No. 2) Bill [HL] - View Vote Context
Baroness D'Souza voted No and in line with the House
One of 23 Crossbench No votes vs 18 Crossbench Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 214 Noes - 216


Speeches
Baroness D'Souza speeches from: House of Lords (Peerage Nominations) Bill [HL]
Baroness D'Souza contributed 1 speech (423 words)
2nd reading
Friday 14th March 2025 - Lords Chamber
Baroness D'Souza speeches from: National Youth Strategy
Baroness D'Souza contributed 2 speeches (590 words)
Thursday 13th March 2025 - Grand Committee


Written Answers
Afghanistan: Development Aid
Asked by: Baroness D'Souza (Crossbench - Life peer)
Friday 14th March 2025

Question to the Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office:

To ask His Majesty's Government what impact the reduction of the overseas aid budget, announced by the Prime Minister on 25 February, will have on support for women and girls in Afghanistan.

Answered by Baroness Chapman of Darlington - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office)

The Prime Minister has set out a new strategic vision for government spending on defence and security and Official Development Assistance (ODA). Detailed decisions on how the ODA budget will be used will be worked through as part of the ongoing Spending Review based on various factors including impact assessments.

Speed Limits
Asked by: Baroness D'Souza (Crossbench - Life peer)
Monday 7th April 2025

Question to the Department for Transport:

To ask His Majesty's Government whether they have observed a reduction in death and injury caused by road traffic accidents in areas, such as central London, which have introduced a 20 miles per hour speed limit.

Answered by Lord Hendy of Richmond Hill - Minister of State (Department for Transport)

The Department for Transport published a comprehensive three-year evaluation of the effect of 20mph limits, which are 20mph schemes relying only on signage, on 22 November 2018.

The evaluation looked at twelve case studies including two in city centres (Brighton and Winchester). No case studies were in London.

It found insufficient evidence to conclude that that there had been a significant change in collisions and casualties following the introduction of 20mph limits in residential areas.

The only case study area showing a significant change in collisions and casualties, relative to its 30mph comparator area, was Brighton City Centre. This scheme covered both major and minor roads, with a 19% reduction in overall casualties, a 29% reduction in pedestrian casualties and a 51% reduction in casualties aged 75 or over. No significant change in casualties of cyclists or under 16s was found.

The evaluation stated that the changes appeared to be a reflection of the city characteristics, and the blanket implementation of 20mph limits across all roads within the scheme area, including higher flow A and B roads which were typically excluded from the residential case study schemes. There was a significant reduction in collisions across all road types, but the change was most pronounced on major strategic roads. The evaluation stressed that this represented just one case study, and the extent to which the findings were transferable to other locations was unclear.