Post Office Appointments: Ministerial Responsibility Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate
Department: Department for Business and Trade

Post Office Appointments: Ministerial Responsibility

Baroness Butler-Sloss Excerpts
Wednesday 7th February 2024

(3 months ago)

Lords Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Watch Debate Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Lord Offord of Garvel Portrait Lord Offord of Garvel (Con)
- View Speech - Hansard - - - Excerpts

I thank the noble Lord for that question. The corporate answer is that the chief executive reports to the chairman; the job of the chairman is to fire the chief executive on behalf of the shareholder; the shareholder is the Government and, since these matters came to light in 2020, we have had the new shareholder relationship document that outlines all the governance on this. Indeed, the Minister for the Post Office has had monthly meetings, starting with Minister Scully through to the current Minister, Minister Hollinrake, with the chief executive. When the new chair is appointed, that chair will step into the position and continue to run the board on behalf of the Government.

Lord Hain Portrait Lord Hain (Lab)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I am sorry, but the Minister has not answered the question from the noble Lord, Lord Arbuthnot.

Baroness Williams of Trafford Portrait Baroness Williams of Trafford (Con)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

Order. It is the turn of the Cross Benches.

Baroness Butler-Sloss Portrait Baroness Butler-Sloss (CB)
- Hansard - -

My Lords, as a member of one of the departments is a member of the board of the Post Office, at the relevant time—and the board knew quite early on that Horizon was not working properly—why did that representative not tell the Government, or did he do so?

Lord Offord of Garvel Portrait Lord Offord of Garvel (Con)
- View Speech - Hansard - - - Excerpts

I thank the noble and learned Baroness: this is the whole purpose of the inquiry. I cannot answer the specific questions, not having been there myself. The inquiry will look into this. What is clear is that there has been a failure of governance. On the face of it, Post Office Ltd is set up with the right checks and balances in place. There have been non-executive directors, there is the government representative on the board, there is a chairman: on the face of it, it should be subject to the governance that we see in private companies. For some reason, there has been a lack of inquiry and of challenge and we need to understand why and find out who is accountable for that.