Marriage (Same Sex Couples) Bill Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate
Department: Attorney General
Monday 17th June 2013

(11 years, 6 months ago)

Lords Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Baroness Brinton Portrait Baroness Brinton
- Hansard - -

That is not true.

Lord Elton Portrait Lord Elton
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

Heads are being shaken all around. I would like to hear.

Baroness Brinton Portrait Baroness Brinton
- Hansard - -

I apologise for intervening. It is quite possible not to be married by the registrar who you see in the previous meeting. It also quite possible for people to have names that do not distinguish their gender.

Lord Elton Portrait Lord Elton
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

The registrar they meet will be able to distinguish their gender and he will put that into the machine and the right people will be there.

Lord Elton Portrait Lord Elton
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

That is what the amendment would provide, which is what we are talking about. Let us not spend too long on this. I have an amendment which simply gives an exemption to the registrar and the superintendent registrar but leaves the service under the control of somebody who is committed to both sorts of marriage, which seems to me is absolutely essential.

There were objections about this opening the door to all sorts of things. The noble Baroness, Lady Thornton, suggested objections to mixed-race marriages. I think that her Amendment 16 lacks a definition. It should define acceptable grounds for religious and conscientious objection. It could be a referral to marriages carried out under the appropriate clause of the Bill. That would close that door and restrict it entirely to this. One does not have to be an enemy of the Bill to see merit in what my noble friend proposes. There is merit in protecting the consciences of people who do a good public service and who, like other people in public services, should be allowed to do it within the limits of their conscientious beliefs.

If we are coming to a compromise, the noble and learned Baroness, Lady Butler-Sloss, has put her finger on it, as has the Joint Select Committee, and there should be an exemption—I think it is called grandfathering—for people already in post before this Bill becomes an Act. I have said my piece. My noble friend is in the right area but it needs to be focused.