Information between 20th April 2025 - 10th May 2025
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.
Division Votes |
---|
24 Apr 2025 - Bank Resolution (Recapitalisation) Bill [Lords] - View Vote Context Bambos Charalambous voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 212 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 89 Noes - 230 |
24 Apr 2025 - Bank Resolution (Recapitalisation) Bill [Lords] - View Vote Context Bambos Charalambous voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 210 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 88 Noes - 212 |
23 Apr 2025 - Sewage - View Vote Context Bambos Charalambous voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 297 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 301 Noes - 69 |
23 Apr 2025 - Hospitals - View Vote Context Bambos Charalambous voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 304 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 77 Noes - 307 |
23 Apr 2025 - Sewage - View Vote Context Bambos Charalambous voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 300 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 77 Noes - 302 |
28 Apr 2025 - Football Governance Bill [Lords] - View Vote Context Bambos Charalambous voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 273 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 74 Noes - 337 |
28 Apr 2025 - Football Governance Bill [Lords] - View Vote Context Bambos Charalambous voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 271 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 342 Noes - 70 |
29 Apr 2025 - Public Authorities (Fraud, Error and Recovery) Bill - View Vote Context Bambos Charalambous voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 248 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 95 Noes - 257 |
29 Apr 2025 - Public Authorities (Fraud, Error and Recovery) Bill - View Vote Context Bambos Charalambous voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 232 Labour No votes vs 11 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 85 Noes - 238 |
29 Apr 2025 - Public Authorities (Fraud, Error and Recovery) Bill - View Vote Context Bambos Charalambous voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 248 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 101 Noes - 258 |
29 Apr 2025 - Public Authorities (Fraud, Error and Recovery) Bill - View Vote Context Bambos Charalambous voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 248 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 73 Noes - 255 |
30 Apr 2025 - Sentencing Guidelines (Pre-sentence Reports) Bill - View Vote Context Bambos Charalambous voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 210 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 214 Noes - 3 |
30 Apr 2025 - Sentencing Guidelines (Pre-sentence Reports) Bill - View Vote Context Bambos Charalambous voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 211 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 88 Noes - 226 |
30 Apr 2025 - Sentencing Guidelines (Pre-sentence Reports) Bill - View Vote Context Bambos Charalambous voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 208 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 86 Noes - 222 |
7 May 2025 - Data (Use and Access) Bill [Lords] - View Vote Context Bambos Charalambous voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 288 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 97 Noes - 363 |
7 May 2025 - Data (Use and Access) Bill [Lords] - View Vote Context Bambos Charalambous voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 287 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 160 Noes - 294 |
7 May 2025 - Data (Use and Access) Bill [Lords] - View Vote Context Bambos Charalambous voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 283 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 88 Noes - 287 |
7 May 2025 - Data (Use and Access) Bill [Lords] - View Vote Context Bambos Charalambous voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 292 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 76 Noes - 295 |
Speeches |
---|
Bambos Charalambous speeches from: Oral Answers to Questions
Bambos Charalambous contributed 1 speech (42 words) Tuesday 22nd April 2025 - Commons Chamber Ministry of Justice |
Written Answers |
---|
Crown Court: Administrative Delays
Asked by: Bambos Charalambous (Labour - Southgate and Wood Green) Tuesday 22nd April 2025 Question to the Ministry of Justice: To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, what steps her Department is taking to reduce the crown court backlog. Answered by Sarah Sackman - Minister of State (Ministry of Justice) We are funding a record allocation of Crown Court sitting days to deliver swifter justice for victims – 110,000 sitting days this year, 4,000 higher than the last Government.
We have launched an independent review into the efficiency of the criminal courts, led by Sir Brian Leveson, to deliver once-in-a-generation reform. |
Select Committee Documents |
---|
Wednesday 7th May 2025
Oral Evidence - Department of Health and Social Care, and Department of Health and Social Care Written Parliamentary Questions: Departmental performance in Session 2024-25 - Procedure Committee Found: Watch the meeting Members present: Cat Smith (Chair); James Asser; David Baines; Bambos Charalambous |
Wednesday 23rd April 2025
Oral Evidence - Mr Nigel Evans, Baroness Winterton of Doncaster, and Baroness Laing of Elderslie Elections within the House of Commons - Procedure Committee Found: Watch the meeting Members present: Cat Smith (Chair); James Asser; Bambos Charalambous; Sir Christopher |
Wednesday 23rd April 2025
Oral Evidence - Natascha Engel, and Baroness Primarolo Elections within the House of Commons - Procedure Committee Found: Watch the meeting Members present: Cat Smith (Chair); James Asser; Bambos Charalambous; Sir Christopher |
Calendar |
---|
Wednesday 7th May 2025 2:30 p.m. Procedure Committee - Private Meeting View calendar - Add to calendar |
Wednesday 7th May 2025 2:30 p.m. Procedure Committee - Oral evidence Subject: Written Parliamentary Questions: Departmental performance in Session 2024-25 At 3:00pm: Oral evidence Karin Smyth MP - Minister of State at Department of Health and Social Care View calendar - Add to calendar |
Wednesday 7th May 2025 2:30 p.m. Procedure Committee - Oral evidence Subject: Written Parliamentary Questions: Departmental performance in Session 2024-25 At 3:00pm: Oral evidence Karin Smyth MP - Minister of State at Department of Health and Social Care Tom Riordan CBE - Second Permanent Secretary at Department of Health and Social Care View calendar - Add to calendar |
Wednesday 7th May 2025 2:30 p.m. Procedure Committee - Oral evidence Subject: Written Parliamentary Questions: Departmental performance in Session 2024-25 View calendar - Add to calendar |
Tuesday 13th May 2025 10 a.m. Administration Committee - Private Meeting View calendar - Add to calendar |
Tuesday 20th May 2025 10 a.m. Administration Committee - Private Meeting View calendar - Add to calendar |
Wednesday 14th May 2025 2:30 p.m. Procedure Committee - Private Meeting View calendar - Add to calendar |
Tuesday 10th June 2025 10 a.m. Administration Committee - Private Meeting View calendar - Add to calendar |
Tuesday 17th June 2025 10 a.m. Administration Committee - Private Meeting View calendar - Add to calendar |
Select Committee Inquiry |
---|
28 Apr 2025
Written Parliamentary Questions: Departmental performance in Session 2024-25 Procedure Committee (Select) Not accepting submissions Written questions (WPQs) allow MPs to ask for information on the work, policy and activities of Government departments, related bodies, and the administration of Parliament. The cross-Whitehall performance standard is 85% for timely provision of written answers, where responses are deemed ‘on time’ for Ordinary Questions if they are provided within five working days of being tabled, and deemed ‘on time’ for Named Day questions if answers are provided by the specified date. Since 2010, the Procedure Committee has been routinely engaged in the monitoring of Government responses to WPQs. The Committee is currently analysing departments’ performance in responding to WPQs during the 2024-25 Session, and will produce its report in due course. |
19 May 2025
Health and Wellbeing Administration Committee (Select) Not accepting submissions This inquiry will look into the health and wellbeing services available to those working in Parliament - exploring how existing services can be better communicated and supported, and identifying where some health and wellbeing needs are still not being met. It will:
Read the terms of reference for more detail on the inquiry. |
22 May 2025
Sub judice resolution in the House of Commons Procedure Committee (Select) Submit Evidence (by 31 Jul 2025) The Speaker has requested that the Procedure Committee conduct a review of the operation of the sub judice resolution in the House of Commons. The resolution is intended to preserve ‘comity’ between the courts and the House, to avoid Parliament influencing, or appearing to attempt to influence, the outcome of court proceedings, and to avoid Parliament acting as an alternative forum for resolution of matters that are before the courts. Parliament is an important forum for discussion of matters of public interest and national importance, and MPs should have the ability to raise, discuss and resolve such matters swiftly and effectively when they emerge. The courts, meanwhile, should also be reassured that their important work is able to proceed effectively to ensure the fair and swift administration of justice. This inquiry will look at whether the current resolution, agreed by the House of Commons in 2001, continues to strike the appropriate balance. |