To match an exact phrase, use quotation marks around the search term. eg. "Parliamentary Estate". Use "OR" or "AND" as link words to form more complex queries.


Keep yourself up-to-date with the latest developments by exploring our subscription options to receive notifications direct to your inbox

Written Question
Children: Maintenance
Tuesday 10th March 2015

Asked by: Anne Begg (Labour - Aberdeen South)

Question to the Department for Work and Pensions:

To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, with reference to the arrears validation element of the Child Support Agency case closure programme, by what processes will the Agency review cases where arrears recovery had been temporarily suspended, to ascertain whether the reasons for temporary suspension remain valid.

Answered by Steve Webb

Under current plans for ending liability in 1993 and 2003 scheme cases, the Department will validate all CSA arrears, including arrears accrued from Interim Maintenance Assessments and those which have been suspended. The approach was set out in both “Preparing for the future, tackling the past: Child Maintenance – Arrears and Compliance Strategy 2012-2017 and Command Paper Cm8399 “Supporting separated families; securing children’s futures”. The validation process will include caseworkers resolving discrepancies on cases and completing outstanding tasks.


Written Question
Children: Maintenance
Tuesday 10th March 2015

Asked by: Anne Begg (Labour - Aberdeen South)

Question to the Department for Work and Pensions:

To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, what arrangements are in place to ensure that parents with care responsibilities whose Child Support Agency (CSA) cases are subject to case closure and who are owed child maintenance arrears are fully informed about (a) the process and likely timescale of the arrears validation process, (b) the reasoning and calculations behind the finalised arrears balance figure they receive and (c) the options open to them regarding the collection of the finalised CSA debt following the closure of their case.

Answered by Steve Webb

All letters sent to parents regarding the end of their CSA arrangement, make clear that arrears remain due or owed, even after liability ends.

After arrears have been validated, parents are advised, in writing, of the balance. The parent with care can speak to the CSA if they want to discuss how the figure has been arrived at in further detail. We cannot advise parents of the exact length or detail of the validation process, as it will depend on the circumstances of individual cases.

Both parties are advised to contact Child Maintenance Options for further information about the collection of their arrears. However, after validation, parents with care will be asked whether or not they wish their arrears to be collected.


Speech in Commons Chamber - Tue 10 Mar 2015
Oral Answers to Questions

Speech Link

View all Anne Begg (Lab - Aberdeen South) contributions to the debate on: Oral Answers to Questions

Division Vote (Commons)
9 Mar 2015 - Consumer Rights Bill - View Vote Context
Anne Begg (Lab) voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 88 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 353 Noes - 5
Written Question
Pension Credit
Monday 9th March 2015

Asked by: Anne Begg (Labour - Aberdeen South)

Question to the Department for Work and Pensions:

To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, what estimate he has made of the number of people for whom the freezing of the savings element of pensions credit and increases in the basic state pension has had a net negative effect on their income in each of the last three financial years.

Answered by Steve Webb

The overall impact of benefit up-rating on a customer’s income depends on a wide variety of factors (including for example any changes to their non state pensions that occur around the same time) which means we cannot accurately measure these impacts. However, the increases in the basic State Pension under the terms of the triple lock, have been more significant than the reductions in the savings credit. Overall it is unlikely that any Pension Credit customer should be worse off, in cash terms, as a result of the uprating decisions made over the last three years.


Written Question
Pension Credit
Monday 9th March 2015

Asked by: Anne Begg (Labour - Aberdeen South)

Question to the Department for Work and Pensions:

To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, what estimate he has made of the number of people in receipt of pension credit whose income from their state pension and pension credit was (a) less in the 2014-15 financial year than it was in the previous financial year, and (b) less in the 2013-14 financial year than it was in the 2012-13 financial year.

Answered by Steve Webb

The overall impact of benefit up-rating on a customer’s income depends on a wide variety of factors (including for example any changes to their non state pensions that occur around the same time) which means we cannot accurately measure these impacts. However, the increases in the basic State Pension under the terms of the triple lock, have been more significant than the reductions in the savings credit. Overall it is unlikely that any Pension Credit customer should be worse off, in cash terms, as a result of the uprating decisions made over the last three years.


Speech in Commons Chamber - Mon 09 Mar 2015
Oral Answers to Questions

Speech Link

View all Anne Begg (Lab - Aberdeen South) contributions to the debate on: Oral Answers to Questions

MP Expense Claim
Anne Begg (Labour - Aberdeen South)
Date
Mon 9th Mar 2015
453962
Type
MP Travel
(Public Tr AIR)
Description
Direct Travel Import 07/09/201
Between London & Constituency
From: ABERDEEN DYCE
To: LONDON HEATHROW
Amount
£448.74
Paid

MP Expense Claim
Anne Begg (Labour - Aberdeen South)
Date
Sat 7th Mar 2015
422488
Type
MP Travel
(Parking)
Description
ABERDEEN INTERNATIONAL Airports, Airport Terminals, Flying Fields
Travel Feb/March 15
Between London & Constituency
Amount
£57.99
Paid

Division Vote (Commons)
4 Mar 2015 - Future Government Spending - View Vote Context
Anne Begg (Lab) voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 211 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 216 Noes - 298