Sentencing Reform/Legal Aid Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate
Department: Ministry of Justice

Sentencing Reform/Legal Aid

Anna Soubry Excerpts
Tuesday 21st June 2011

(12 years, 11 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
John Bercow Portrait Mr Speaker
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

Order. In the interests of maximising the number of contributors, I appeal to hon. and right hon. Members for short questions and short answers.

Anna Soubry Portrait Anna Soubry (Broxtowe) (Con)
- Hansard - -

Does the Lord Chancellor agree that it was the last Labour Government who, having introduced IPPs, then changed the law for no other reason than to reduce the prison population? As for the thoroughly good idea that we now scrap IPPs, would we not thereby ensure that the public—the victims and, indeed, the offenders—were better protected and had greater justice?

Lord Clarke of Nottingham Portrait Mr Clarke
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I agree with my hon. Friend. I think that the reason the last Government introduced IPPs was that they were reducing the time of a sentence automatically served from three quarters to a half. They introduced what sounded like a tough measure, with these new indeterminate sentences. However, it immediately went wrong, and they introduced more legislation after two years to try to reduce the numbers. I regret to say that my first effort was to go in the same direction and reduce them even more. I hope that I have my hon. Friend’s support in saying that the best thing is to get rid of them and return to a sensible system of long, determinate sentencing.