Debates between Angela Eagle and Jim Allister during the 2024 Parliament

Asylum Seekers: Hotel Accommodation

Debate between Angela Eagle and Jim Allister
Wednesday 20th November 2024

(1 month ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Angela Eagle Portrait Dame Angela Eagle
- View Speech - Hansard - -

I welcome any progress, but I also recognise the seasonality of arrivals. Unlike the last Government, I am not here to tell the House that there are any quick or easy solutions to this difficult problem. We are getting the system up and running, we have created the border security command to start disrupting and degrading the gangs that are smuggling people across the channel, and we will assert the right of the rule of law to exist, and get our asylum system working, so that we can stop those dangerous crossings.

However, I cannot stand here and say that a magic wand that can easily be waved. It will take hard cross-jurisdictional and cross-country work, and that is what the border security commander has been appointed to do. That is what the extra £150 million of resource given to that job is there to do. That is what our operational and National Crime Agency people are there to do and are doing.

Jim Allister Portrait Jim Allister (North Antrim) (TUV)
- View Speech - Hansard - - - Excerpts

We have heard today that more than 19,000 illegals have come in on small boats since the Government came into office. Does the Minister have any figures on the influx in the United Kingdom of illegals and others from the Republic of Ireland, where there are no checks? On the question of hotels, how can my constituents judge her party’s manifesto pledge to reduce the number of hotels? To help them do that, will she undertake to publish, on a monthly or bi-monthly basis, the number of hotels in use in each constituency and the number of illegals accommodated in them?

Angela Eagle Portrait Dame Angela Eagle
- View Speech - Hansard - -

No. The previous Government did not do that either, for safeguarding and public safety reasons, as the hon. Gentleman knows.