All 1 Andy Slaughter contributions to the Health Service Medical Supplies (Costs) Act 2017

Read Bill Ministerial Extracts

Thu 15th Sep 2016
Points of Order
Commons Chamber

1st reading: House of Commons

Points of Order Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate

Points of Order

Andy Slaughter Excerpts
1st reading: House of Commons
Thursday 15th September 2016

(8 years, 1 month ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Health Service Medical Supplies (Costs) Act 2017 Read Hansard Text
Andy Slaughter Portrait Andy Slaughter (Hammersmith) (Lab)
- Hansard - -

On a point of order, Mr Speaker. A consultation document has been published in the last 10 minutes—I am grateful to my hon. Friend the Member for Kingston upon Hull North (Diana Johnson) for going to the Vote Office to get it for me—on the closure of the major court in my constituency along with Camberwell magistrates court, also in London. There has been no written ministerial statement and no other notice. Such things are often published late in the day on the day that the House rises. The court serves 600,000 people in London and was told only in June that extra capacity was needed. There should be an opportunity to raise such important local issues. By the time the House sits again, more than half of the consultation period will be over. Should not Ministers deal with Members on a more courteous basis?

John Bercow Portrait Mr Speaker
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

The short answer to the hon. Gentleman’s inquiry is yes. It would be courteous if such announcements were made at an earlier point, not shortly before the House ceases to sit with minimal opportunity in parliamentary terms for the hon. Gentleman to explore the matter. I suggest that he uses his remaining time today to look at the options for asking parliamentary questions or for seeking a debate on this important matter. He would have every prospect of securing such a debate, and although it would be at a later point than he would wish, I guess it would be better than nothing.

I hope that Ministers will take account of what the hon. Gentleman said, because this concern can be felt by Members on both sides of the House. It is not clever when Ministers behave in this way. If it is done without malice or forethought, it is simply thoughtless. If it is done on the basis of knowing that it will disadvantage or inconvenience a Member, it is rank, inconsiderate and disrespectful not merely to the Member but, at least as importantly, to his or her constituents.