Andrew Lewin - Alert Sample

Alert Sample

View the Parallel Parliament page for Andrew Lewin

Information between 10th June 2026 - 20th June 2026

Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.

Division Votes
9 Jun 2026 - Steel Industry (Nationalisation) Bill - View Vote Context Andrew Lewin voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 275 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 157 Noes - 287
9 Jun 2026 - Steel Industry (Nationalisation) Bill - View Vote Context Andrew Lewin voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 274 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 94 Noes - 297
9 Jun 2026 - Steel Industry (Nationalisation) Bill - View Vote Context Andrew Lewin voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 275 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 90 Noes - 290
9 Jun 2026 - Business without Debate - View Vote Context Andrew Lewin voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 280 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 356 Noes - 86
10 Jun 2026 - Railways Bill - View Vote Context Andrew Lewin voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 263 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 278 Noes - 149
10 Jun 2026 - Railways Bill - View Vote Context Andrew Lewin voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 263 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 155 Noes - 279
10 Jun 2026 - Railways Bill - View Vote Context Andrew Lewin voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 264 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 167 Noes - 266
10 Jun 2026 - Railways Bill - View Vote Context Andrew Lewin voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 268 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 77 Noes - 271
17 Jun 2026 - National Security (State Threats) Bill - View Vote Context Andrew Lewin voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 244 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 135 Noes - 258
17 Jun 2026 - National Security (State Threats) Bill - View Vote Context Andrew Lewin voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 240 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 144 Noes - 244
17 Jun 2026 - National Security (State Threats) Bill - View Vote Context Andrew Lewin voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 245 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 143 Noes - 249
17 Jun 2026 - National Security (State Threats) Bill - View Vote Context Andrew Lewin voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 249 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 85 Noes - 317
17 Jun 2026 - National Security (State Threats) Bill (Allocation of Time) - View Vote Context Andrew Lewin voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 231 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 233 Noes - 94
16 Jun 2026 - Cyber Security and Resilience (Network and Information Systems) Bill - View Vote Context Andrew Lewin voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 250 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 151 Noes - 258
16 Jun 2026 - Business without Debate - View Vote Context Andrew Lewin voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 249 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 262 Noes - 86
16 Jun 2026 - Cyber Security and Resilience (Network and Information Systems) Bill - View Vote Context Andrew Lewin voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 242 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 162 Noes - 246
16 Jun 2026 - Cyber Security and Resilience (Network and Information Systems) Bill - View Vote Context Andrew Lewin voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 252 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 77 Noes - 255

Speeches
Andrew Lewin speeches from: Oral Answers to Questions Andrew Lewin contributed 1 speech (90 words) Thursday 18th June 2026 - Commons Chamber Department for Digital, Culture, Media & Sport
Andrew Lewin speeches from: Oral Answers to Questions Andrew Lewin contributed 1 speech (95 words) Thursday 11th June 2026 - Commons Chamber Department for Transport
Andrew Lewin speeches from: Business of the House Andrew Lewin contributed 1 speech (138 words) Thursday 11th June 2026 - Commons Chamber Leader of the House

Written Answers
Special Educational Needs: Qualifications Asked by: Andrew Lewin (Labour - Welwyn Hatfield) Thursday 18th June 2026 Question to the Department for Education: To ask the Secretary of State for Education, whether she has made an assessment of the potential merits of all secondary schools notifying SEND students and their families of the option to study Functional Skills Qualifications instead of GCSEs. Answered by Georgia Gould - Minister of State (Education) The department is committed to securing an excellent education for every child and your person. We recognise that GCSEs will not be the most appropriate route for every young person. While most pupils at key stage 4 work towards GCSEs or Technical Awards, alternative routes, including Functional Skills Qualifications and post-16 study programmes tailored to prior attainment and intended progression, can play an important role for some learners, including some with special educational needs and disabilities (SEND). Functional Skills Qualifications are used primarily for post-16 students because they are designed for work and life and to be taught in an applied manner, depending on the needs of the learner during their post-16 study. Under departmental policy, learners continue studying either GCSEs or Functional Skills depending on their prior attainment and their chosen pathway with the aim of helping them make progress towards Level 2. We are also introducing a new Level 1 qualifications are aimed at 16 to 19 learners resitting English and/or maths with a GCSE grade 2 or below. We expect that there will still be a role for Functional Skills qualifications for some learners, including those with SEND. Functional Skills qualifications will therefore remain a valuable qualification for adult learners and we will consider how the new qualification will sit alongside them. During key stage 4, most pupils work towards national qualifications, usually GCSEs or Technical Awards. GCSEs are longstanding, credible and well-respected. They rigorously assess the knowledge acquired by pupils during key stage 4 and are in line with expected standards in countries with high performing education systems.

Written Answers

Special Educational Needs: Qualifications
Asked by: Andrew Lewin (Labour - Welwyn Hatfield)
Thursday 18th June 2026

Question to the Department for Education:

To ask the Secretary of State for Education, whether she has made an assessment of the potential merits of all secondary schools notifying SEND students and their families of the option to study Functional Skills Qualifications instead of GCSEs.

Answered by Georgia Gould - Minister of State (Education)

The department is committed to securing an excellent education for every child and your person. We recognise that GCSEs will not be the most appropriate route for every young person. While most pupils at key stage 4 work towards GCSEs or Technical Awards, alternative routes, including Functional Skills Qualifications and post-16 study programmes tailored to prior attainment and intended progression, can play an important role for some learners, including some with special educational needs and disabilities (SEND).

Functional Skills Qualifications are used primarily for post-16 students because they are designed for work and life and to be taught in an applied manner, depending on the needs of the learner during their post-16 study. Under departmental policy, learners continue studying either GCSEs or Functional Skills depending on their prior attainment and their chosen pathway with the aim of helping them make progress towards Level 2.

We are also introducing a new Level 1 qualifications are aimed at 16 to 19 learners resitting English and/or maths with a GCSE grade 2 or below. We expect that there will still be a role for Functional Skills qualifications for some learners, including those with SEND. Functional Skills qualifications will therefore remain a valuable qualification for adult learners and we will consider how the new qualification will sit alongside them.

During key stage 4, most pupils work towards national qualifications, usually GCSEs or Technical Awards. GCSEs are longstanding, credible and well-respected. They rigorously assess the knowledge acquired by pupils during key stage 4 and are in line with expected standards in countries with high performing education systems.

Andrew Lewin mentioned

Live Transcript
Note: Cited speaker in live transcript data may not always be accurate. Check video link to confirm.
11 Jun 2026, 10:15 a.m. - House of Commons " Olly Glover, the Liberal >> Olly Glover, the Liberal Democrat spokesman. >> Thank you, Mr. Speaker. >> The apologies Andrew Lewin for Sarah Edwards. " Andrew Lewin MP (Welwyn Hatfield, Labour) - View Video - View Transcript
11 Jun 2026, 11:29 a.m. - House of Commons " Andrew Lewin. to be proud of, but we have a very serious anti-social behaviour problem in the Parkhouse Court area of the town. Daytime drinking, " Andrew Lewin MP (Welwyn Hatfield, Labour) - View Video - View Transcript
18 Jun 2026, 10:07 a.m. - House of Commons ">> He should be ashamed. Only got four minutes left. And I've just got to get through this order. >> Andrew Lewin thank. >> You, Mr. Speaker. " Rt Hon Lisa Nandy MP, The Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport (Wigan, Labour) - View Video - View Transcript
15 Jun 2026, 4:22 p.m. - House of Commons " Andrew Lewin thank you, Mr. Speaker. Conservatives hollowing out our defence. The present is a story of this government spending more than they did at any time over 14 years. " Andrew Lewin MP (Welwyn Hatfield, Labour) - View Video - View Transcript

Select Committee Documents
Friday 19th June 2026 Report - 3rd Report - Appointment of the Chair of the Local Audit Office Housing, Communities and Local Government Committee Found: Democrat; Newbury) Maya Ellis (Labour; Ribble Valley) Mr Will Forster (Liberal Democrat; Woking) Andrew Lewin