All 5 Debates between Andrew Gwynne and Amber Rudd

Terrorist Attack: Nice

Debate between Andrew Gwynne and Amber Rudd
Monday 18th July 2016

(8 years, 4 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Amber Rudd Portrait Amber Rudd
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

My hon. Friend is absolutely right. National security remains the sole responsibility of member states, and we will continue to work bilaterally with France, sharing information and deepening our relationship so that we can ensure that we keep both our countries safe.

Andrew Gwynne Portrait Andrew Gwynne (Denton and Reddish) (Lab)
- Hansard - -

I welcome the Home Secretary to her post. She is right to condemn these vicious atrocities in Nice. After the Paris attacks in November, her predecessor, the new Prime Minister, committed to a review of firearms responses in the United Kingdom. Can she update the House on how that review has gone and whether any changes have been instigated as a result of it?

Amber Rudd Portrait Amber Rudd
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I thank the hon. Gentleman. That review is ongoing—it is not finished yet, but I will make sure that I get him an update of where we are so that he is fully informed.

Onshore Wind Subsidies

Debate between Andrew Gwynne and Amber Rudd
Monday 22nd June 2015

(9 years, 5 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
Amber Rudd Portrait Amber Rudd
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I thank my hon. Friend for his interesting suggestion. Councils will have the final say. If that is how they put it, that is up to them.

Andrew Gwynne Portrait Andrew Gwynne (Denton and Reddish) (Lab)
- Hansard - -

Is the Secretary of State not a little bit concerned about the impact on investor confidence that this decision might have not just with regard to onshore wind but across the renewables sector? Given that onshore wind and its supply chain accounts for £1.7 billion of gross value added, how does she anticipate filling that gap in investment?

Amber Rudd Portrait Amber Rudd
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

Investors will have seen the manifesto and will have heard the words of the Prime Minister last year when he said that, under a Conservative Government, there will be no onshore wind subsidies. They will have known that our target was 11 GW to 13 GW by 2020, and they are likely to have known that wind was deploying faster and more effectively than people had thought, partly because it was on the receiving end of those subsidies. Continuing to get investment in renewables and ensuring that Britain is open for business and remains at the front of delivering renewable energy will continue under this Government.

Oral Answers to Questions

Debate between Andrew Gwynne and Amber Rudd
Thursday 5th February 2015

(9 years, 9 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
Amber Rudd Portrait Amber Rudd
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

To get a CfD one has to have a supply chain plan in place, so we hope that that will reinforce the need to have local support and an effective local supply chain.

Andrew Gwynne Portrait Andrew Gwynne (Denton and Reddish) (Lab)
- Hansard - -

8. What steps he is taking to help households improve their energy efficiency.

Infrastructure Bill [Lords]

Debate between Andrew Gwynne and Amber Rudd
Monday 26th January 2015

(9 years, 10 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Amber Rudd Portrait Amber Rudd
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I will make progress, but I assure hon. Members that I will let them intervene before I finish.

The environmental regulator adopts a risk-based approach to its assessment that is endorsed by the Royal Society. In addition, as was announced in Committee, the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs will direct the Environment Agency to require operators to undertake at least three months’ baseline monitoring of methane in groundwater before hydraulic fracturing can commence.

Andrew Gwynne Portrait Andrew Gwynne
- Hansard - -

I want to take the Minister back to what she said about the use of secondary legislation. She will know, having been a Member of the House for a number of years, that secondary legislation is dealt with in a Committee that lasts a maximum of merely 90 minutes. We need to enshrine the environmental safeguards in primary legislation. Why is she so obsessed with not doing that?

Amber Rudd Portrait Amber Rudd
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I am only sorry that the hon. Gentleman did not have time to listen to the Committee, where we spent many, many hours debating this subject and many different subjects. That gave everyone a great opportunity to raise all the issues. There is no suggestion that there has not been enough time to address this matter.

Andrew Gwynne Portrait Andrew Gwynne
- Hansard - -

On a point of order, Mr Speaker. Will you please rule on the Minister’s view, because she seems to be confusing the Bill Committee with an Order in Council committee, which lasts a mere 90 minutes?

Oral Answers to Questions

Debate between Andrew Gwynne and Amber Rudd
Thursday 18th December 2014

(9 years, 11 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
Amber Rudd Portrait Amber Rudd
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

May I reassure the hon. Gentleman that the changes to ECO clearly did not change at all the targets to help vulnerable people. Although we made the changes to reduce the amount on the bills, we have continued to focus on vulnerable people and will continue to do so as a priority.

Andrew Gwynne Portrait Andrew Gwynne (Denton and Reddish) (Lab)
- Hansard - -

Will the Minister confirm that as a result of the changes to the energy companies obligation, nearly half a million homes will not be able to receive that financial assistance to upgrade their energy units to get cheaper bills?

Amber Rudd Portrait Amber Rudd
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

As I just said, the Government are absolutely committed to helping the most vulnerable. Although we reduced the charges on bills to look after consumers and taxpayers generally, we were absolutely clear that the most vulnerable people would not be affected. The section of the ECO that is dedicated to helping the most vulnerable people remains in place and continues to provide support.