Information between 8th July 2025 - 18th July 2025
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.
Division Votes |
---|
8 Jul 2025 - Football Governance Bill [Lords] - View Vote Context Andrew Bowie voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 86 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 415 Noes - 98 |
8 Jul 2025 - Football Governance Bill [Lords] - View Vote Context Andrew Bowie voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 89 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 178 Noes - 338 |
8 Jul 2025 - Football Governance Bill [Lords] - View Vote Context Andrew Bowie voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 92 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 167 Noes - 346 |
9 Jul 2025 - Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill - View Vote Context Andrew Bowie voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 95 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 175 Noes - 401 |
9 Jul 2025 - Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill - View Vote Context Andrew Bowie voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 91 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 336 Noes - 242 |
9 Jul 2025 - Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill - View Vote Context Andrew Bowie voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 96 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 130 Noes - 443 |
9 Jul 2025 - Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill - View Vote Context Andrew Bowie voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 95 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 35 Noes - 469 |
9 Jul 2025 - Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill - View Vote Context Andrew Bowie voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 93 Conservative Aye votes vs 1 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 103 Noes - 416 |
15 Jul 2025 - Taxes - View Vote Context Andrew Bowie voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 94 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 165 Noes - 342 |
Speeches |
---|
Andrew Bowie speeches from: Oral Answers to Questions
Andrew Bowie contributed 2 speeches (266 words) Tuesday 15th July 2025 - Commons Chamber Department for Energy Security & Net Zero |
Andrew Bowie speeches from: State of Climate and Nature
Andrew Bowie contributed 3 speeches (1,183 words) Monday 14th July 2025 - Commons Chamber Department for Energy Security & Net Zero |
Andrew Bowie speeches from: Oral Answers to Questions
Andrew Bowie contributed 3 speeches (337 words) Wednesday 9th July 2025 - Commons Chamber Scotland Office |
Andrew Bowie speeches from: Draft Electricity Capacity (Amendment) (No. 2) Regulations 2025
Andrew Bowie contributed 1 speech (646 words) Wednesday 9th July 2025 - General Committees Department for Energy Security & Net Zero |
Written Answers |
---|
Lithium: Safety
Asked by: Andrew Bowie (Conservative - West Aberdeenshire and Kincardine) Monday 14th July 2025 Question to the Department for Work and Pensions: To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, what steps her Department is taking to ensure that (a) the Health and Safety Executive’s assessment of lithium salts for classification is rigorously evidence-based, (b) the weight of scientific evidence is prioritised in decision-making and (c) a clear timeline is established for completion. Answered by Stephen Timms - Minister of State (Department for Work and Pensions) The Health and Safety Executive’s (HSE) assessment of lithium salts (lithium substances/compounds) for classification includes a technical assessment that is rigorously evidence-based. The weight and strength of the relevant available scientific information relating to the hazardous properties of a chemical are used when making recommendations for mandatory classification and labelling.
Further information has been submitted in addition to that identified by HSE regulatory and scientific specialists during the drafting of the Agency Technical Report and Agency Opinion. Under the Article 37A procedure, HSE specialists are now investigating this information and scientific data and, if necessary, seeking additional information or consulting other departments or agencies.
There is no statutory time limit on HSE to prepare and submit a GB mandatory classification and labelling proposal. Once HSE has submitted its proposal for public consultation, there is a clear timeline for completion and milestones established in statute under the procedure set out in Article 37A of the GB CLP Regulation. |
Parliamentary Debates |
---|
Electricity Market Review
38 speeches (6,927 words) Thursday 10th July 2025 - Commons Chamber Department for Energy Security & Net Zero Mentions: 1: Ed Miliband (Lab - Doncaster North) Member for West Aberdeenshire and Kincardine (Andrew Bowie), is not in his place, but he said that it - Link to Speech |