Information between 2nd July 2025 - 12th July 2025
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.
Division Votes |
---|
2 Jul 2025 - Prevention and Suppression of Terrorism - View Vote Context Amanda Hack voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 276 Labour Aye votes vs 9 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 385 Noes - 26 |
2 Jul 2025 - Deferred Division - View Vote Context Amanda Hack voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 326 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 333 Noes - 168 |
2 Jul 2025 - Deferred Division - View Vote Context Amanda Hack voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 327 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 338 Noes - 79 |
2 Jul 2025 - Armed Forces Commissioner Bill - View Vote Context Amanda Hack voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 314 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 321 Noes - 158 |
3 Jul 2025 - Bus Services (No. 2) Bill [ Lords ] (Seventh sitting) - View Vote Context Amanda Hack voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 8 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 3 Noes - 10 |
3 Jul 2025 - Bus Services (No. 2) Bill [ Lords ] (Seventh sitting) - View Vote Context Amanda Hack voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 8 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 5 Noes - 8 |
3 Jul 2025 - Bus Services (No. 2) Bill [ Lords ] (Seventh sitting) - View Vote Context Amanda Hack voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 8 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 1 Noes - 8 |
3 Jul 2025 - Bus Services (No. 2) Bill [ Lords ] (Seventh sitting) - View Vote Context Amanda Hack voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 8 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 2 Noes - 8 |
3 Jul 2025 - Bus Services (No. 2) Bill [ Lords ] (Seventh sitting) - View Vote Context Amanda Hack voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 8 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 4 Noes - 9 |
3 Jul 2025 - Bus Services (No. 2) Bill [ Lords ] (Seventh sitting) - View Vote Context Amanda Hack voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 8 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 2 Noes - 8 |
3 Jul 2025 - Bus Services (No. 2) Bill [ Lords ] (Seventh sitting) - View Vote Context Amanda Hack voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 8 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 2 Noes - 8 |
3 Jul 2025 - Bus Services (No. 2) Bill [ Lords ] (Seventh sitting) - View Vote Context Amanda Hack voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 8 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 4 Noes - 8 |
3 Jul 2025 - Bus Services (No. 2) Bill [ Lords ] (Sixth sitting) - View Vote Context Amanda Hack voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 9 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 3 Noes - 11 |
2 Jul 2025 - Competition - View Vote Context Amanda Hack voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 327 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 338 Noes - 79 |
2 Jul 2025 - Prisons - View Vote Context Amanda Hack voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 326 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 333 Noes - 168 |
4 Jul 2025 - House of Commons - View Vote Context Amanda Hack voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 21 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 1 Noes - 33 |
8 Jul 2025 - Football Governance Bill [Lords] - View Vote Context Amanda Hack voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 331 Labour Aye votes vs 1 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 415 Noes - 98 |
8 Jul 2025 - Football Governance Bill [Lords] - View Vote Context Amanda Hack voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 338 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 167 Noes - 346 |
8 Jul 2025 - Football Governance Bill [Lords] - View Vote Context Amanda Hack voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 333 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 178 Noes - 338 |
8 Jul 2025 - Football Governance Bill [Lords] - View Vote Context Amanda Hack voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 336 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 86 Noes - 340 |
9 Jul 2025 - Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill - View Vote Context Amanda Hack voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 377 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 175 Noes - 401 |
9 Jul 2025 - Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill - View Vote Context Amanda Hack voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 333 Labour Aye votes vs 47 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 336 Noes - 242 |
9 Jul 2025 - Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill - View Vote Context Amanda Hack voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 377 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 103 Noes - 416 |
9 Jul 2025 - Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill - View Vote Context Amanda Hack voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 356 Labour No votes vs 8 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 35 Noes - 469 |
9 Jul 2025 - Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill - View Vote Context Amanda Hack voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 330 Labour Aye votes vs 37 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 335 Noes - 135 |
9 Jul 2025 - Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill - View Vote Context Amanda Hack voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 364 Labour No votes vs 7 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 105 Noes - 370 |
9 Jul 2025 - Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill - View Vote Context Amanda Hack voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 331 Labour No votes vs 47 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 149 Noes - 334 |
9 Jul 2025 - Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill - View Vote Context Amanda Hack voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 333 Labour No votes vs 35 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 130 Noes - 443 |
11 Jul 2025 - House of Commons - View Vote Context Amanda Hack voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 40 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 1 Noes - 58 |
11 Jul 2025 - Unauthorised Entry to Football Matches Bill - View Vote Context Amanda Hack voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 42 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 0 Noes - 47 |
Written Answers |
---|
Public Expenditure
Asked by: Amanda Hack (Labour - North West Leicestershire) Wednesday 2nd July 2025 Question to the HM Treasury: To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, what assessment she has made of the potential impact of changes to the Green Book rules on North West Leicestershire constituency. Answered by Darren Jones - Chief Secretary to the Treasury HM Treasury concluded a review of the Green Book in June 2025. It marks a new approach to appraisal in the public sector, one which will enable the more effective assessment of place-based interventions in every area of the country. That includes North West Leicestershire.
Following the review, HM Treasury will now undertake six actions to improve appraisal across the public sector. These are set out in the conclusions of the Green Book Review 2025, published on GOV.UK.
|
Brain: Injuries
Asked by: Amanda Hack (Labour - North West Leicestershire) Tuesday 8th July 2025 Question to the Department of Health and Social Care: To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, what recent progress he has made on ensuring that (a) patients and (b) families affected by brain aneurysms receive adequate (i) screening, (ii) treatment, (iii) care, (iv) long-term monitoring and (v) rehabilitation. Answered by Ashley Dalton - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department of Health and Social Care) It is the responsibility of integrated care boards (ICBs) to make available appropriate provision to meet the health and care needs of their local population, including services for people with brain aneurysms, as they are best placed to make decisions according to local need. The process of commissioning services should take into account best practice guidance, including that published by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). Nationally, there are several initiatives that are supporting improvements to neurological services more generally. NHS England’s Getting It Right First Time Neurology Programme aims to reduce unwarranted variation and improve efficiency across neurological services, through data-driven analysis and best practice sharing. Additionally, NHS England’s Neurology Transformation Programme is supporting integrated care systems to transform neurology services by promoting integrated care, prevention, and early intervention. NICE is currently developing the guidance Rehabilitation for chronic neurological disorders including acquired brain injury, which is expected to be published in September 2025. The guideline covers rehabilitation in all settings for children, young people, and adults with a chronic neurological disorder, neurological impairment, or disabling neurological symptoms resulting from acquired brain injury, spinal cord injury or peripheral nerve disorder, progressive neurological disease, or functional neurological disorder. Further information is available at the following link: https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/indevelopment/gid-ng10181 NICE has also published the guidance Subarachnoid haemorrhage caused by a ruptured aneurysm: diagnosis and management. The guideline focuses on the diagnosis and management of individuals who are suspected of having a subarachnoid haemorrhage (SAH) caused by ruptured aneurysm and includes recommendations on follow-up care and support for patients, their families, and carers. This guidance also covers familial aneurysms in the context of SAH and recommends that that individuals with two or more first-degree relatives who have had a SAH may be offered screening to detect potential aneurysms. This guidance is available at the following link: https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng228 The Government expects the healthcare system and commissioners to take NICE guidelines fully into account when designing services for their local population, and to work towards their implementation over time. Our 10-year health plan will make the three big shifts the National Health Service needs to be prepared for future challenges, from hospital to community care, from analogue to digital, and from sickness to prevention. We are committed to expanding community-based access to tests and scans, promoting a more collaborative service delivery, and enhancing the use of apps and wearable technology. These changes will help people manage their long-term conditions, including brain aneurysms, more effectively and closer to their homes. Earlier diagnosis will play a key role in preventing disease progression and improving outcomes. |
Brain: Injuries
Asked by: Amanda Hack (Labour - North West Leicestershire) Tuesday 8th July 2025 Question to the Department of Health and Social Care: To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, what steps he is taking to ensure that brain aneurysms are (a) recognised and (b) dealt with (i) in the NHS ten-year plan and (ii) by his Department. Answered by Ashley Dalton - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department of Health and Social Care) It is the responsibility of integrated care boards (ICBs) to make available appropriate provision to meet the health and care needs of their local population, including services for people with brain aneurysms, as they are best placed to make decisions according to local need. The process of commissioning services should take into account best practice guidance, including that published by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). Nationally, there are several initiatives that are supporting improvements to neurological services more generally. NHS England’s Getting It Right First Time Neurology Programme aims to reduce unwarranted variation and improve efficiency across neurological services, through data-driven analysis and best practice sharing. Additionally, NHS England’s Neurology Transformation Programme is supporting integrated care systems to transform neurology services by promoting integrated care, prevention, and early intervention. NICE is currently developing the guidance Rehabilitation for chronic neurological disorders including acquired brain injury, which is expected to be published in September 2025. The guideline covers rehabilitation in all settings for children, young people, and adults with a chronic neurological disorder, neurological impairment, or disabling neurological symptoms resulting from acquired brain injury, spinal cord injury or peripheral nerve disorder, progressive neurological disease, or functional neurological disorder. Further information is available at the following link: https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/indevelopment/gid-ng10181 NICE has also published the guidance Subarachnoid haemorrhage caused by a ruptured aneurysm: diagnosis and management. The guideline focuses on the diagnosis and management of individuals who are suspected of having a subarachnoid haemorrhage (SAH) caused by ruptured aneurysm and includes recommendations on follow-up care and support for patients, their families, and carers. This guidance also covers familial aneurysms in the context of SAH and recommends that that individuals with two or more first-degree relatives who have had a SAH may be offered screening to detect potential aneurysms. This guidance is available at the following link: https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng228 The Government expects the healthcare system and commissioners to take NICE guidelines fully into account when designing services for their local population, and to work towards their implementation over time. Our 10-year health plan will make the three big shifts the National Health Service needs to be prepared for future challenges, from hospital to community care, from analogue to digital, and from sickness to prevention. We are committed to expanding community-based access to tests and scans, promoting a more collaborative service delivery, and enhancing the use of apps and wearable technology. These changes will help people manage their long-term conditions, including brain aneurysms, more effectively and closer to their homes. Earlier diagnosis will play a key role in preventing disease progression and improving outcomes. |
Early Day Motions Signed |
---|
Thursday 17th July Amanda Hack signed this EDM on Monday 21st July 2025 Changing Places Toilets Awareness Day 21 signatures (Most recent: 22 Jul 2025)Tabled by: Daniel Francis (Labour - Bexleyheath and Crayford) That this House notes Changing Places Toilet Awareness Day 2025 which takes place on 19 July; recognises the importance of Changing Places toilets for disabled people and their families across the United Kingdom; supports their call for a Changing Places toilet in all public venues so that everyone, regardless of … |
Parliamentary Debates |
---|
Schools (Allergy Safety)
2 speeches (1,197 words) 1st reading Wednesday 9th July 2025 - Commons Chamber Mentions: 1: Chris Bloore (Lab - Redditch) put and agreed to.Ordered,That Chris Bloore, Tahir Ali, Sarah Coombes, Cat Eccles, Sarah Edwards, Amanda Hack - Link to Speech |
Children with Allergies: School Safeguarding
23 speeches (10,355 words) Thursday 3rd July 2025 - Westminster Hall Department for Education Mentions: 1: Stephen Morgan (Lab - Portsmouth South) and Crayford (Daniel Francis), for Nuneaton (Jodie Gosling) and for North West Leicestershire (Amanda Hack - Link to Speech 2: Chris Bloore (Lab - Redditch) Friend the Member for North West Leicestershire (Amanda Hack), who is no longer in her place. - Link to Speech |
Bill Documents |
---|
Jun. 18 2025
All proceedings up to 18 June 2025 at Report Stage Crime and Policing Bill 2024-26 Bill proceedings: Commons Found: Shaun Davies Amanda Martin Steve Yemm Lloyd Hatton Sarah Gibson Joe Powell Rosie Wrighting Amanda Hack |
APPG Publications |
---|
Maternity APPG Document: Minutes Maternity APPG Inaugural Meeting 10 March 2025.docx Found: Hastings and Rye), Mark Ferguson MP (Gateshead Central and Whickham), Jodie Gosling MP (Nuneaton), Amanda Hack |
Calendar |
---|
Wednesday 16th July 2025 8:30 a.m. Work and Pensions Committee - Oral evidence Subject: The work of the Department for Work and Pensions At 9:30am: Oral evidence The Rt Hon Liz Kendall MP - Secretary of State at Department for Work and Pensions Sir Peter Schofield KCB - Permanent Secretary at Department for Work and Pensions View calendar - Add to calendar |
Select Committee Inquiry |
---|
16 Jul 2025
Employment support for disabled people Work and Pensions Committee (Select) Submit Evidence (by 29 Sep 2025) With the disability employment gap persistently at nearly 30%, the Government has announced it will spend an additional £2.2 billion on employment support over the next four years. The Committee will explore the reasons behind the disability employment gap, scrutinise Government programmes to support disabled people into work and make recommendations for future support. |