Information between 15th September 2025 - 25th September 2025
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.
| Division Votes |
|---|
|
15 Sep 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Allison Gardner voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 304 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 332 Noes - 160 |
|
15 Sep 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Allison Gardner voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 300 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 328 Noes - 160 |
|
15 Sep 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Allison Gardner voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 303 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 314 Noes - 178 |
|
15 Sep 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Allison Gardner voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 301 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 329 Noes - 163 |
|
15 Sep 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Allison Gardner voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 300 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 326 Noes - 160 |
|
15 Sep 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Allison Gardner voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 300 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 330 Noes - 158 |
|
15 Sep 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Allison Gardner voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 300 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 316 Noes - 172 |
|
15 Sep 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Allison Gardner voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 301 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 316 Noes - 161 |
|
15 Sep 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Allison Gardner voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 302 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 330 Noes - 161 |
|
15 Sep 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Allison Gardner voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 302 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 330 Noes - 161 |
|
15 Sep 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Allison Gardner voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 302 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 318 Noes - 170 |
|
15 Sep 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Allison Gardner voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 304 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 327 Noes - 164 |
|
16 Sep 2025 - Sentencing Bill - View Vote Context Allison Gardner voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 277 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 78 Noes - 292 |
|
16 Sep 2025 - Sentencing Bill - View Vote Context Allison Gardner voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 278 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 340 Noes - 77 |
| Speeches |
|---|
|
Allison Gardner speeches from: Sentencing Bill
Allison Gardner contributed 2 speeches (683 words) 2nd reading Tuesday 16th September 2025 - Commons Chamber Ministry of Justice |
| Written Answers |
|---|
|
Planning Permission
Asked by: Allison Gardner (Labour - Stoke-on-Trent South) Monday 15th September 2025 Question to the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government: To ask the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government, what steps her Department is taking to help tackle the use of retrospective planning applications to regularise unauthorised development; and whether she plans to close loopholes that may undermine the effectiveness of local planning enforcement. Answered by Matthew Pennycook - Minister of State (Housing, Communities and Local Government) Enforcement is at the discretion of local planning authorities. They have a wide range of powers with strong penalties for non-compliance and it is for them to decide how and when they use those powers depending on the circumstances of each case.
The government has no plans to amend local planning authorities’ enforcement powers at this time. We will, however, continue to keep the operation of the enforcement system under review.
With regard to capacity and capability, I refer the hon. Member to the answer given to question UIN 67508 on 14 July 2025. |
|
Planning Authorities: Staffordshire
Asked by: Allison Gardner (Labour - Stoke-on-Trent South) Monday 15th September 2025 Question to the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government: To ask the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government, what steps her Department is taking to help support local planning authorities to improve the (a) capacity and (b) resourcing of their planning enforcement teams in North Staffordshire. Answered by Matthew Pennycook - Minister of State (Housing, Communities and Local Government) Enforcement is at the discretion of local planning authorities. They have a wide range of powers with strong penalties for non-compliance and it is for them to decide how and when they use those powers depending on the circumstances of each case.
The government has no plans to amend local planning authorities’ enforcement powers at this time. We will, however, continue to keep the operation of the enforcement system under review.
With regard to capacity and capability, I refer the hon. Member to the answer given to question UIN 67508 on 14 July 2025. |
|
Planning Obligations
Asked by: Allison Gardner (Labour - Stoke-on-Trent South) Monday 15th September 2025 Question to the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government: To ask the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government, what steps her Department is taking to improve enforcement of agreements under section 106 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990. Answered by Matthew Pennycook - Minister of State (Housing, Communities and Local Government) Enforcement is at the discretion of local planning authorities. They have a wide range of powers with strong penalties for non-compliance and it is for them to decide how and when they use those powers depending on the circumstances of each case.
The government has no plans to amend local planning authorities’ enforcement powers at this time. We will, however, continue to keep the operation of the enforcement system under review.
With regard to capacity and capability, I refer the hon. Member to the answer given to question UIN 67508 on 14 July 2025. |
|
Housing First
Asked by: Allison Gardner (Labour - Stoke-on-Trent South) Monday 15th September 2025 Question to the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government: To ask the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government, what assessment she has made of the potential merits of implementing an expanded national programme of Housing First to tackle homelessness. Answered by Alison McGovern - Minister of State (Housing, Communities and Local Government) I refer the hon. Member to the answer given to Question UIN 72851 on 15 September 2025. |
| Early Day Motions Signed |
|---|
|
Monday 15th September Allison Gardner signed this EDM as a sponsor on Monday 15th September 2025 Award of honorary posthumous England cap to Frank Soo 10 signatures (Most recent: 16 Sep 2025)Tabled by: Daisy Cooper (Liberal Democrat - St Albans) That this House celebrates the award of an honorary posthumous England Cap for Frank Soo by the Football Association, to his family and the Frank Soo Foundation; recognises that Frank Soo was the first player of Asian descent to play for England, making his debut against Wales in 1942, and … |
| Calendar |
|---|
|
Tuesday 14th October 2025 9 a.m. Science, Innovation and Technology Committee - Oral evidence Subject: Innovation showcase View calendar - Add to calendar |
| Select Committee Documents |
|---|
|
Wednesday 3rd September 2025
Oral Evidence - ARIA, and ARIA Science, Innovation and Technology Committee |
|
Tuesday 16th September 2025
Oral Evidence - DSIT, Office for Life Sciences, and Department of Health and Social Care (DHSC) Science, Innovation and Technology Committee |
|
Tuesday 16th September 2025
Oral Evidence - MSD, ABPI (The Association of the British Pharmaceutical Industry), and AstraZeneca Science, Innovation and Technology Committee |
| Select Committee Inquiry |
|---|
|
2 Oct 2025
Life sciences investment Science, Innovation and Technology Committee (Select) Not accepting submissions With MSD cancelling its £1 billion ongoing manufacturing site in Kings Cross, AstraZeneca pausing its £200 million investment in its Cambridge site, and the latter upgrading its US listing, the Science, Innovation and Technology Committee is launching a call for evidence on UK life sciences competitiveness. This follows an initial emergency session, where it heard from representatives from MSD and AstraZeneca, as well as the ABPI, and from officials and ministers, including Minister for Science, Research and Innovation, Patrick Vallance. The call for written evidence will examine the competitiveness of the UK’s life sciences sector, barriers to innovation for medicines in the UK, issues with pricing uptake and access, and the impact of other countries’ policies. |