Information between 11th March 2025 - 10th April 2025
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.
Division Votes |
---|
18 Mar 2025 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context Alex McIntyre voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 312 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 167 Noes - 324 |
18 Mar 2025 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context Alex McIntyre voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 314 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 107 Noes - 324 |
18 Mar 2025 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context Alex McIntyre voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 311 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 382 Noes - 104 |
18 Mar 2025 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context Alex McIntyre voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 306 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 77 Noes - 313 |
18 Mar 2025 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context Alex McIntyre voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 301 Labour No votes vs 6 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 77 Noes - 315 |
17 Mar 2025 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context Alex McIntyre voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 307 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 65 Noes - 317 |
17 Mar 2025 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context Alex McIntyre voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 309 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 160 Noes - 319 |
17 Mar 2025 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context Alex McIntyre voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 311 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 159 Noes - 317 |
19 Mar 2025 - National Insurance Contributions (Secondary Class 1 Contributions) Bill - View Vote Context Alex McIntyre voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 310 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 316 Noes - 189 |
19 Mar 2025 - National Insurance Contributions (Secondary Class 1 Contributions) Bill - View Vote Context Alex McIntyre voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 308 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 313 Noes - 190 |
19 Mar 2025 - Winter Fuel Payment - View Vote Context Alex McIntyre voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 289 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 177 Noes - 293 |
19 Mar 2025 - National Insurance Contributions (Secondary Class 1 Contributions) Bill - View Vote Context Alex McIntyre voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 312 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 316 Noes - 187 |
19 Mar 2025 - National Insurance Contributions (Secondary Class 1 Contributions) Bill - View Vote Context Alex McIntyre voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 310 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 314 Noes - 187 |
19 Mar 2025 - National Insurance Contributions (Secondary Class 1 Contributions) Bill - View Vote Context Alex McIntyre voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 307 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 310 Noes - 183 |
19 Mar 2025 - National Insurance Contributions (Secondary Class 1 Contributions) Bill - View Vote Context Alex McIntyre voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 304 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 307 Noes - 182 |
1 Apr 2025 - Product Regulation and Metrology Bill [Lords] - View Vote Context Alex McIntyre voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 293 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 110 Noes - 302 |
1 Apr 2025 - Product Regulation and Metrology Bill [Lords] - View Vote Context Alex McIntyre voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 293 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 303 Noes - 110 |
12 Mar 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Alex McIntyre voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 305 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 333 Noes - 100 |
12 Mar 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Alex McIntyre voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 303 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 333 Noes - 100 |
12 Mar 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Alex McIntyre voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 302 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 167 Noes - 328 |
12 Mar 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Alex McIntyre voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 304 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 168 Noes - 314 |
12 Mar 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Alex McIntyre voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 303 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 164 Noes - 324 |
12 Mar 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Alex McIntyre voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 305 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 337 Noes - 98 |
11 Mar 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Alex McIntyre voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 313 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 105 Noes - 409 |
11 Mar 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Alex McIntyre voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 319 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 106 Noes - 340 |
11 Mar 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Alex McIntyre voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 316 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 189 Noes - 324 |
11 Mar 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Alex McIntyre voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 317 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 95 Noes - 323 |
11 Mar 2025 - Data (Use and Access) Bill [ Lords ] (Fourth sitting) - View Vote Context Alex McIntyre voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 9 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 4 Noes - 11 |
11 Mar 2025 - Data (Use and Access) Bill [ Lords ] (Fourth sitting) - View Vote Context Alex McIntyre voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 9 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 2 Noes - 9 |
11 Mar 2025 - Data (Use and Access) Bill [ Lords ] (Fourth sitting) - View Vote Context Alex McIntyre voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 9 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 4 Noes - 9 |
11 Mar 2025 - Data (Use and Access) Bill [ Lords ] (Fourth sitting) - View Vote Context Alex McIntyre voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 9 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 4 Noes - 9 |
11 Mar 2025 - Data (Use and Access) Bill [ Lords ] (Fourth sitting) - View Vote Context Alex McIntyre voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 9 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 2 Noes - 9 |
11 Mar 2025 - Data (Use and Access) Bill [ Lords ] (Fourth sitting) - View Vote Context Alex McIntyre voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 9 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 2 Noes - 9 |
11 Mar 2025 - Data (Use and Access) Bill [ Lords ] (Fourth sitting) - View Vote Context Alex McIntyre voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 9 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 2 Noes - 9 |
11 Mar 2025 - Data (Use and Access) Bill [ Lords ] (Fourth sitting) - View Vote Context Alex McIntyre voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 9 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 2 Noes - 9 |
11 Mar 2025 - Data (Use and Access) Bill [ Lords ] (Fourth sitting) - View Vote Context Alex McIntyre voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 9 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 2 Noes - 9 |
11 Mar 2025 - Data (Use and Access) Bill [ Lords ] (Fourth sitting) - View Vote Context Alex McIntyre voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 9 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 2 Noes - 9 |
11 Mar 2025 - Data (Use and Access) Bill [ Lords ] (Fourth sitting) - View Vote Context Alex McIntyre voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 9 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 4 Noes - 9 |
11 Mar 2025 - Data (Use and Access) Bill [ Lords ] (Fourth sitting) - View Vote Context Alex McIntyre voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 9 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 4 Noes - 9 |
2 Apr 2025 - Driving Licences: Zero Emission Vehicles - View Vote Context Alex McIntyre voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 295 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 304 Noes - 101 |
2 Apr 2025 - Energy Conservation - View Vote Context Alex McIntyre voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 288 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 349 Noes - 14 |
2 Apr 2025 - Onshore Wind and Solar Generation - View Vote Context Alex McIntyre voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 299 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 307 Noes - 100 |
Speeches |
---|
Alex McIntyre speeches from: Horizon Redress and Post Office Update
Alex McIntyre contributed 1 speech (124 words) Tuesday 8th April 2025 - Commons Chamber Department for Business and Trade |
Alex McIntyre speeches from: Gaza: Israeli Military Operations
Alex McIntyre contributed 1 speech (102 words) Wednesday 2nd April 2025 - Commons Chamber Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office |
Alex McIntyre speeches from: Domestic Abuse Offences
Alex McIntyre contributed 1 speech (81 words) Monday 17th March 2025 - Commons Chamber Ministry of Justice |
Written Answers |
---|
Alopecia: Gloucester
Asked by: Alex McIntyre (Labour - Gloucester) Wednesday 26th March 2025 Question to the Department of Health and Social Care: To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, what steps he is taking to improve access to treatment for people with alopecia areata in Gloucester. Answered by Karin Smyth - Minister of State (Department of Health and Social Care) The Government is committed to supporting all those living with dermatological conditions, including alopecia areata. Dermatology services are being transformed to make sure that patients are seen on time. NHS England’s Getting It Right First Time Programme for Dermatology is working with National Health Service trusts to deliver rapid clinical transformation. The work brings together clinicians and operational teams to work collectively to transform patient pathways, reduce unnecessary appointments, and improve access and waiting times for patients. In March 2024, the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) recommended ritlecitinib as an option for treating severe alopecia areata in people 12 years old and over. The NHS is legally required to make funding available for treatments recommended in NICE technology appraisal guidance within three months of publication of the guidance, opening the way for patients across the country, including in Gloucester, to access this treatment. It is a clinician’s responsibility to make decisions appropriate to the circumstances of their patient, whilst ensuring they are taking account of appropriate national guidance on clinical effectiveness, as well as the local commissioning decisions of their respective integrated care board (ICB), in this case the NHS Gloucestershire ICB. |
Endometriosis: Research
Asked by: Alex McIntyre (Labour - Gloucester) Friday 28th March 2025 Question to the Department of Health and Social Care: To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, what steps he is taking to increase (a) funding and (b) support for research into endometriosis. Answered by Ashley Dalton - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department of Health and Social Care) The Department commissions research through the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR). Over the past 10 years, the NIHR has invested approximately £11.2 million into research with a focus on endometriosis and continues to welcome funding applications for research into any aspect of women’s health, including endometriosis. To support further research into women’s health, in 2024 the NIHR launched two new funding calls for studies seeking to improve the health and wellbeing of women. Details of the successful funding awards will be published on the NIHR’s website later this year. |
Phlebotomy: Gloucester
Asked by: Alex McIntyre (Labour - Gloucester) Thursday 27th March 2025 Question to the Department of Health and Social Care: To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, what steps he is taking to support phlebotomists in Gloucester. Answered by Karin Smyth - Minister of State (Department of Health and Social Care) Local organisations are responsible for supporting their workforce, including staff in phlebotomy roles. We are aware of local industrial action in Gloucester. This is a local issue for the Gloucestershire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust to manage, working in partnership with trade unions. |
Retail Trade: Empty Property
Asked by: Alex McIntyre (Labour - Gloucester) Monday 31st March 2025 Question to the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government: To ask the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government, what steps she is taking to support the (a) implementation and (b) effectiveness of high street rental auctions in Gloucester. Answered by Alex Norris - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Housing, Communities and Local Government) The Government is fully committed to revitalising our high streets and supporting businesses to make our towns and cities, including Gloucester, successful. High Street Rental Auctions (HSRAs) are supported by a fund of over £1 million, a new burdens payment and a suite of detailed guidance and practical templates to support implementation. My department are working closely with 11 local authority early adopters, who will be amongst the first to deliver, and will help shape future guidance and champion these powers. |
Domestic Abuse: Gloucester
Asked by: Alex McIntyre (Labour - Gloucester) Monday 31st March 2025 Question to the Home Office: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, what funding her Department provides to children and young people’s domestic abuse services in Gloucester. Answered by Jess Phillips - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Home Office) This Government has set out an ambition to halve violence against women and girls (VAWG) within a decade and will treat it as the national emergency that it is. Supporting children and young people who are victims of domestic abuse within their families and in their own relationships must be a key part of that through the forthcoming VAWG strategy. The Home Office currently funds specialist support to children who have been impacted by domestic abuse through the Children Affected by Domestic Abuse (CADA) Fund, which supported eight organisations across England and Wales with £10.3 million between 2022 and 2025. The Government has increased funding to all local authorities to £160 million for 2025-26, an uplift of £30 million from the previous year, to provide further support in safe accommodation for domestic abuse survivors, including children. We will deliver a cross-government, transformative approach, underpinned by a new VAWG Strategy published later this year. This will take into account the needs of all victims, including children. |
Police: Gloucester
Asked by: Alex McIntyre (Labour - Gloucester) Monday 31st March 2025 Question to the Home Office: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, what steps her Department is taking to increase public confidence in policing in Gloucester. Answered by Diana Johnson - Minister of State (Home Office) As part of the Safer Street’s Mission, the Government has set out an ambition to halve violence against women and girls, halve knife crime and restore public confidence in policing, including through the delivery of a Neighbourhood Policing Guarantee.
Provision has been made for £1,527,344 of funding to Gloucestershire Constabulary to kickstart the increase of neighbourhood policing personnel in 2025/26. |
Parliamentary Debates |
---|
Business without Debate
0 speeches (None words) Monday 17th March 2025 - Commons Chamber |
“Chapter 4A
177 speeches (47,644 words) Tuesday 11th March 2025 - Commons Chamber Department for Business and Trade Mentions: 1: None Friend the Member for Gloucester (Alex McIntyre), whose private Member’s Bill—the Domestic Abuse (Safe - Link to Speech |
Employment Rights Bill
79 speeches (21,138 words) Report stage (day 1) continued Tuesday 11th March 2025 - Commons Chamber Department for Business and Trade Mentions: 1: None Friend the Member for Gloucester (Alex McIntyre) on his ten-minute rule Bill to introduce paid leave - Link to Speech |
Select Committee Documents |
---|
Wednesday 2nd April 2025
Oral Evidence - 2025-04-02 09:30:00+01:00 Health and Social Care Committee Found: ; Danny Beales; Ben Coleman; Jen Craft; Josh Fenton-Glynn; Andrew George; Paulette Hamilton; Alex McIntyre |
Wednesday 2nd April 2025
Oral Evidence - 2025-04-02 09:30:00+01:00 Health and Social Care Committee Found: Danny Beales; Ben Coleman; Jen Craft; Josh Fenton -Glynn; Andrew George; Paulette Hamilton; Alex McIntyre |
Wednesday 2nd April 2025
Oral Evidence - 2025-04-02 09:30:00+01:00 Health and Social Care Committee Found: ; Danny Beales; Ben Coleman; Jen Craft; Josh Fenton-Glynn; Andrew George; Paulette Hamilton; Alex McIntyre |
Wednesday 19th March 2025
Oral Evidence - 2025-03-19 09:30:00+00:00 Adult Social Care Reform: The Cost of Inaction - Health and Social Care Committee Found: Danny Beales; Dr Beccy Cooper; Jen Craft; Josh Fenton-Glynn; Andrew George; Paulette Hamilton; Alex McIntyre |
Calendar |
---|
Tuesday 1st April 2025 12:45 p.m. Health and Social Care Committee - Private Meeting View calendar - Add to calendar |
Wednesday 2nd April 2025 9:15 a.m. Health and Social Care Committee - Oral evidence Subject: Gambling- related harms View calendar - Add to calendar |
Tuesday 25th March 2025 3:15 p.m. Health and Social Care Committee - Private Meeting View calendar - Add to calendar |
Wednesday 26th March 2025 9:15 a.m. Health and Social Care Committee - Oral evidence Subject: The work of NHS England View calendar - Add to calendar |
Wednesday 19th March 2025 9 a.m. Health and Social Care Committee - Private Meeting View calendar - Add to calendar |
Wednesday 19th March 2025 9:15 a.m. Health and Social Care Committee - Oral evidence Subject: Adult Social Care Reform: The Cost of Inaction View calendar - Add to calendar |
Tuesday 18th March 2025 12:45 p.m. Health and Social Care Committee - Private Meeting View calendar - Add to calendar |
Select Committee Inquiry |
---|
21 Mar 2025
The First 1000 Days: a renewed focus Health and Social Care Committee (Select) Not accepting submissions The first 1000 days of life, from conception to age two, are widely recognised as a critical period for child development, shaping long-term health, well-being, and life outcomes.The previous Committee examined this period in its 2019 First 1000 days of life inquiryconsidering national strategy, current spending and barriers to investment and local provision. Since then, there have been a number of significant policy developments in this area.The most notable being the shift to integrated care services (ICSs) under the previous Government in 2022.The current Government has allocated £126 million for early years support and the expansion of Family Hubs under its mission to “break down the barriers to opportunities”.The Committee’s inquiry will examine progress made since 2019, the effectiveness of family hubs and integrated care systems in improving early childhood outcomesand how inequalities in access can be most improved. |