Alberto Costa Alert Sample


Alert Sample

View the Parallel Parliament page for Alberto Costa

Information between 22nd October 2025 - 1st November 2025

Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.


Division Votes
21 Oct 2025 - Sentencing Bill - View Vote Context
Alberto Costa voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 89 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 104 Noes - 317
21 Oct 2025 - Sentencing Bill - View Vote Context
Alberto Costa voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 89 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 105 Noes - 381
21 Oct 2025 - Sentencing Bill - View Vote Context
Alberto Costa voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 88 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 182 Noes - 307
21 Oct 2025 - Sentencing Bill - View Vote Context
Alberto Costa voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 88 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 167 Noes - 313
21 Oct 2025 - Sentencing Bill - View Vote Context
Alberto Costa voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 89 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 389 Noes - 102
21 Oct 2025 - Sentencing Bill - View Vote Context
Alberto Costa voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 85 Conservative No votes vs 1 Conservative Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 77 Noes - 390
28 Oct 2025 - China Spying Case - View Vote Context
Alberto Costa voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 90 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 174 Noes - 327
28 Oct 2025 - Stamp Duty Land Tax - View Vote Context
Alberto Costa voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 95 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 103 Noes - 329
29 Oct 2025 - Sentencing Bill - View Vote Context
Alberto Costa voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 94 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 321 Noes - 103
29 Oct 2025 - Sentencing Bill - View Vote Context
Alberto Costa voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 97 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 170 Noes - 328
29 Oct 2025 - Sentencing Bill - View Vote Context
Alberto Costa voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 96 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 182 Noes - 311
29 Oct 2025 - Sentencing Bill - View Vote Context
Alberto Costa voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 95 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 173 Noes - 323
27 Oct 2025 - Victims and Courts Bill - View Vote Context
Alberto Costa voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 79 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 152 Noes - 337
27 Oct 2025 - Victims and Courts Bill - View Vote Context
Alberto Costa voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 82 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 165 Noes - 323
27 Oct 2025 - Victims and Courts Bill - View Vote Context
Alberto Costa voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 79 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 153 Noes - 332
27 Oct 2025 - Victims and Courts Bill - View Vote Context
Alberto Costa voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 83 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 166 Noes - 322


Speeches
Alberto Costa speeches from: Privileges
Alberto Costa contributed 1 speech (846 words)
Wednesday 29th October 2025 - Commons Chamber
Leader of the House


Written Answers
Narborough Station
Asked by: Alberto Costa (Conservative - South Leicestershire)
Monday 27th October 2025

Question to the Department for Transport:

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, what assessment he has made of the potential impact of trends in the level of service reliability on annual passenger footfall at Narborough Station since 2019.

Answered by Simon Lightwood - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Transport)

Unreliable rail services disrupt passengers’ journeys and undermine passenger confidence. This is why we are taking steps to improve train service performance across the country to better deliver for passengers. Passenger numbers across all CrossCountry routes are similar to those that were seen in 2019. Office of Rail and Road figures show growth in demand at Narborough station, with an estimated 240,000 entries and exits in the 2023-24 financial year. This is an increase of 32,000 on the year before.

Cross Country Trains: Standards
Asked by: Alberto Costa (Conservative - South Leicestershire)
Monday 27th October 2025

Question to the Department for Transport:

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, what recent assessment she has made of the adequacy of the (a) reliability and (b) punctuality of CrossCountry services operating between Birmingham, Leicester and Stansted Airport.

Answered by Simon Lightwood - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Transport)

CrossCountry train services were not reliable enough in 2024 and the operator was subject to a Remedial Plan from August 2024 to March 2025. Since January 2025, CrossCountry train service performance has generally improved, although issues remain on Sundays. The Rail Minister has met CrossCountry Directors who are well aware that there is more for them to do. A new senior management team at CrossCountry is taking steps to address underlying issues within the business. We expect to see improvements for passengers, and will continue to hold the operator to account for delivery of the contractual performance benchmarks.

Cross Country Trains: Standards
Asked by: Alberto Costa (Conservative - South Leicestershire)
Monday 27th October 2025

Question to the Department for Transport:

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, whether her Department has received proposals on improving the (a) reliability, (b) capacity and (c) frequency of services serving Narborough station from CrossCountry.

Answered by Simon Lightwood - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Transport)

We expect operators to plan services balancing the need to meet expected passenger demand, improve train service performance, be affordable and provide value for money for taxpayers. Office of Rail and Road station statistics show that service reliability at Narborough has generally improved in the eight weeks to 13 September 2025. Officials monitor CrossCountry performance closely and will continue to hold them to account for delivery of the contractual performance benchmarks.

Cross Country Trains: Standards
Asked by: Alberto Costa (Conservative - South Leicestershire)
Monday 27th October 2025

Question to the Department for Transport:

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, what discussions he has had with CrossCountry on increasing capacity on (a) peak services between Leicester and Narborough and (b) the 17:18 weekday service from Leicester to Birmingham.

Answered by Simon Lightwood - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Transport)

In December 2024, CrossCountry removed First Class accommodation from the trains used on the Birmingham to Stansted Airport route, increasing the number of seats available to all ticket holders. All operators are expected to plan capacity on individual services to best match the expected level of demand, whilst making efficient use of the train fleet and train crew resources available to them. Officials are working with CrossCountry to develop a business case to further expand their Inter-City train fleet.

Cybercrime
Asked by: Alberto Costa (Conservative - South Leicestershire)
Wednesday 22nd October 2025

Question to the Department for Science, Innovation & Technology:

To ask the Secretary of State for Science, Innovation and Technology, whether she has made an assessment of the adequacy of technical support offered by technology companies to people who report cyber crime incidents affecting their products.

Answered by Kanishka Narayan - Parliamentary Under Secretary of State (Department for Science, Innovation and Technology)

The Product Security and Telecommunications Infrastructure Act (2022) places a legal obligation on the manufacturers of internet-connected devices to offer a vulnerability reporting process. This means anyone - including users, security researchers and cyber crime victims - must have a clear, secure way to report vulnerabilities to device manufacturers. The Act also places a legal obligation on device manufacturers to support their products with software and security updates for a defined period.

Technical support for cyber crime victims is not regulated under the Act. Victims should report cyber crimes to the police via the Action Fraud website or phone line.




Alberto Costa mentioned

Live Transcript

Note: Cited speaker in live transcript data may not always be accurate. Check video link to confirm.

29 Oct 2025, 7:06 p.m. - House of Commons
">> Commend it to the House. >> The question is, as on the Order Paper, and I call the Chair of the. >> Privileges Committee. >> Alberto Costa. "
Division - View Video - View Transcript
29 Oct 2025, 7:06 p.m. - House of Commons
">> Alberto Costa. >> Thank you, Madam. >> Deputy Speaker. >> And may I. >> Support the motion proposed. >> By the leader of. "
Division - View Video - View Transcript


Parliamentary Debates
Privileges
11 speeches (1,940 words)
Wednesday 29th October 2025 - Commons Chamber
Leader of the House
Mentions:
1: Alan Campbell (Lab - Tynemouth) Member for South Leicestershire (Alberto Costa), for his Committee’s swift work in considering the matter - Link to Speech
2: Alan Campbell (Lab - Tynemouth) Member for South Leicestershire (Alberto Costa), the Chair of the Committee of Privileges, who spoke - Link to Speech



Select Committee Documents
Monday 27th October 2025
Report - 1st Report - Appointment of IPSA Board Members (Former Member and Statutory Auditor)

Speaker's Committee for the Independent Parliamentary Standards Authority

Found: (Speaker of the House of Commons) (Chair) Rt Hon Sir Alan Campbell MP ( Labour, Tynemouth) Alberto Costa




Alberto Costa - Select Committee Information

Calendar
Wednesday 26th November 2025 8:45 a.m.
Committee of Privileges - Private Meeting
View calendar - Add to calendar
Tuesday 11th November 2025 10 a.m.
Administration Committee - Private Meeting
View calendar - Add to calendar
Tuesday 9th December 2025 10 a.m.
Administration Committee - Private Meeting
View calendar - Add to calendar


Select Committee Documents
Tuesday 28th October 2025
Correspondence - Letter from the Chair to Lord Gardiner of Kimble, Chair of the House of Lords Liaison Committee in response to his letter regarding the implementation of recommendations of public inquiries, dated 24 October 2025.

Liaison Committee (Commons)
Monday 27th October 2025
Report - 1st Report - Appointment of IPSA Board Members (Former Member and Statutory Auditor)

Speaker's Committee for the Independent Parliamentary Standards Authority
Tuesday 14th October 2025
Oral Evidence - 2025-10-14 10:45:00+01:00

Health and Wellbeing - Administration Committee
Tuesday 14th October 2025
Oral Evidence - 2025-10-14 10:10:00+01:00

Health and Wellbeing - Administration Committee


Select Committee Inquiry
11 Nov 2025
General Election Planning
Administration Committee (Select)

Submit Evidence (by 9 Jan 2026)


The Administration Committee will look at support for Members during the General Election and provisions for newly inducted Members, splitting into split into two different work streams: support for newly elected Members and support for departing Members after the General Election.

It will:

  • Gather evidence on the experiences of Members who were newly elected in 2024
  • Consider the effectiveness of support offered to Members in their first few days
  • Consider the effectiveness of the measures put in place by the Administration following the Committee’s 2023 report which focused on the support for departing Members and their staff

Read the call for evidence for more detail on the inquiry.