Information between 20th April 2026 - 30th May 2026
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.
| Division Votes |
|---|
|
20 Apr 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context Alberto Costa voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 89 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 292 Noes - 158 |
|
20 Apr 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context Alberto Costa voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 88 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 293 Noes - 159 |
|
20 Apr 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context Alberto Costa voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 87 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 294 Noes - 156 |
|
21 Apr 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context Alberto Costa voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 81 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 287 Noes - 150 |
|
21 Apr 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context Alberto Costa voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 80 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 284 Noes - 149 |
|
21 Apr 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context Alberto Costa voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 78 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 291 Noes - 144 |
|
21 Apr 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context Alberto Costa voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 77 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 288 Noes - 147 |
|
21 Apr 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context Alberto Costa voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 82 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 298 Noes - 152 |
|
21 Apr 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context Alberto Costa voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 77 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 287 Noes - 149 |
|
21 Apr 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context Alberto Costa voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 78 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 297 Noes - 147 |
|
21 Apr 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context Alberto Costa voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 84 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 293 Noes - 155 |
|
27 Apr 2026 - Northern Ireland Troubles Bill (Carry-over) - View Vote Context Alberto Costa voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 101 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 279 Noes - 176 |
|
27 Apr 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context Alberto Costa voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 97 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 279 Noes - 164 |
|
27 Apr 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context Alberto Costa voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 96 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 271 Noes - 171 |
|
27 Apr 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context Alberto Costa voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 95 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 269 Noes - 170 |
|
27 Apr 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context Alberto Costa voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 94 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 270 Noes - 170 |
|
27 Apr 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context Alberto Costa voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 93 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 273 Noes - 167 |
|
28 Apr 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context Alberto Costa voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 95 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 335 Noes - 158 |
|
20 May 2026 - Defence Readiness - View Vote Context Alberto Costa voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 86 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 307 Noes - 171 |
|
20 May 2026 - Defence Readiness - View Vote Context Alberto Costa voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 89 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 104 Noes - 316 |
|
20 May 2026 - Defence Readiness - View Vote Context Alberto Costa voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 89 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 78 Noes - 408 |
|
20 May 2026 - Defence Readiness - View Vote Context Alberto Costa voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 89 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 104 Noes - 317 |
|
19 May 2026 - Energy Security - View Vote Context Alberto Costa voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 96 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 108 Noes - 323 |
|
21 May 2026 - Steel Industry (Nationalisation) Bill - View Vote Context Alberto Costa voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 67 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 68 Noes - 242 |
| Speeches |
|---|
|
Alberto Costa speeches from: Point of Order: Rectification Procedure
Alberto Costa contributed 1 speech (95 words) Wednesday 22nd April 2026 - Commons Chamber |
| Written Answers |
|---|
|
Community Health Services: Leicestershire
Asked by: Alberto Costa (Conservative - South Leicestershire) Monday 20th April 2026 Question to the Department of Health and Social Care: To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, what steps his Department is taking to ensure that there are adequate (a) resources and (b) workforce capacity in community health services, particularly in areas served by the Leicester, Leicestershire and Rutland Integrated Care System. Answered by Karin Smyth - Minister of State (Department of Health and Social Care) NHS England is responsible for funding allocations to integrated care boards (ICBs). NHS England takes advice on the underlying formula from the independent Advisory Committee on Resource Allocation. The formula takes account of population, age, need, deprivation, health inequality considerations, and unavoidable costs, for example the increased costs caused by lower population density in rural areas. Therefore, the ICB allocations issued by NHS England for 2026/27 to 2028/29 will take account of the demographics of the Leicester, Leicestershire and Rutland Integrated Care System in providing a fair share of overall National Health Service resources. We recently published the Neighbourhood Health Framework, which is available at the following link: This framework will help systems deliver neighbourhood health, which will improve people’s health and care outcomes, reduce health inequalities, and help them stay well at home, partly by strengthening primary and community care services. NHS England then wrote to ICBs and NHS providers setting out the expectations on local action to advance neighbourhood health in 2026/27 to 2027/28, including commissioning for population health, with further information available at the following link: https://www.england.nhs.uk/long-read/next-steps-on-neighbourhood-health-and-new-delivery-models/ |
|
Health Services: Rural Areas
Asked by: Alberto Costa (Conservative - South Leicestershire) Monday 20th April 2026 Question to the Department of Health and Social Care: To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, what recent assessment his Department has made of the potential impact of the ongoing restructuring of NHS England and the reduction in Integrated Care Systems on (a) the pace of service development and transformation and (b) access to healthcare services for rural and semi‑rural communities (i) in Leicestershire and (ii) elsewhere in England. Answered by Karin Smyth - Minister of State (Department of Health and Social Care) The new Department will operate in a leaner, more agile, and more efficient way and will empower staff at all levels of the health system. These reforms will give more power and autonomy to local leaders and systems, stripping away red tape and bureaucracy and providing more freedom to better deliver health services for their local communities. The 10-Year Health Plan sets out the need for a leaner national centre, one that sets clearer priorities, provides strategic direction, and supports local systems rather than relying on command and control. By integrating the Department and NHS England and significantly reducing duplication, the programme directly delivers this aspect of the 10-Year Health Plan vision, and compliments the other system changes happening at an integrated care board and provider level. Delivery expectations are embedded throughout the plan, which will shift care from hospital to community, analogue to digital, and sickness to prevention, which will benefit local constituencies. We are moving towards fewer but larger integrated care boards, with a renewed focus on the local level as part of our commitment to delivering care closer to home, and this includes rural and semi rural areas. As outlined in our 10-Year Health Plan, neighbourhood health plans will be created, including for Leicestershire, and will be brought together as part of the integrated care boards’ plans to improve population health locally. All integrated care boards will continue to focus on their role as strategic commissioners, supporting service transformation and development to deliver the priorities set out in the 10-Year Health Plan.
|
|
NHS: Databases
Asked by: Alberto Costa (Conservative - South Leicestershire) Tuesday 28th April 2026 Question to the Department of Health and Social Care: To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, what safeguards are in place to ensure that data accessed or processed through the NHS Federated Data Platform cannot be repurposed, now or in the future, for immigration enforcement or other non‑health-related functions, including by third-party contractors or their overseas affiliates. Answered by Zubir Ahmed Data held within the NHS Federated Data Platform (FDP) remains under the full control of the National Health Service at all times. The supplier does not control NHS data and is not permitted to access, use, or share data for its own purposes.
The supplier cannot view NHS data unless explicitly authorised by an NHS Data Controller. The supplier acts solely on the instruction of the NHS when processing data on the platform. The FDP and Associated Services contract includes strict confidentiality requirements, supported by governance arrangements to oversee delivery and the use of the platform.
It is a contractual requirement that data held within the NHS FDP cannot be accessed by supplier staff or contractors located outside the United Kingdom. These arrangements ensure that NHS data remains under UK jurisdiction and that all data processing takes place within the UK.
In line with the General Data Protection Regulation principles of transparency and accountability, NHS England has published information within the FDP Information Governance Framework. Data held within the FDP cannot be accessed or processed by non‑UK Government entities.
There are no products within the NHS FDP that hold immigration status or residency status. Immigration or residency data does not form part of NHS England data collections, nor does it form part of an individual’s health record. |
|
Export Controls
Asked by: Alberto Costa (Conservative - South Leicestershire) Friday 22nd May 2026 Question to the Department for Business and Trade: To ask the Secretary of State for Business and Trade, what guidance is provided to exporters on demonstrating low diversion risk under the Sanctions End-Use Controls. Answered by Chris Bryant - Minister of State (Department for Business and Trade) The Department for Business and Trade (DBT) provides guidance for businesses on Sanctions End-Use Controls and countering sanctions evasion through GOV.UK, which sets out how exporters can address diversion risk. Exporters should evidence robust due diligence, including clear understanding of the end use and end user, transparent supply chains and consistent commercial and transport documentation. DBT continues to support exporter compliance through regularly updated guidance and proactive stakeholder engagement to ensure businesses understand their obligations. |
| MP Financial Interests |
|---|
|
27th April 2026
Alberto Costa (Conservative - South Leicestershire) 2. Donations and other support (including loans) for activities as an MP Heather Craven - £5,000.00 Source |
|
27th April 2026
Alberto Costa (Conservative - South Leicestershire) 2. Donations and other support (including loans) for activities as an MP Heather Craven - £2,500.00 Source |
| Live Transcript |
|---|
|
Note: Cited speaker in live transcript data may not always be accurate. Check video link to confirm. |
|
22 Apr 2026, 2:03 p.m. - House of Commons " And that concludes the statement. I call Alberto Costa on a point of order in connection with the Code of Conduct to rectify a failure to declare. " Alberto Costa MP (South Leicestershire, Conservative) - View Video - View Transcript |
| Parliamentary Debates |
|---|
|
Referral of Prime Minister to Committee of Privileges
305 speeches (50,803 words) Tuesday 28th April 2026 - Commons Chamber Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office Mentions: 1: Alicia Kearns (Con - Rutland and Stamford) Friend and neighbour the Member for South Leicestershire (Alberto Costa), and I want to place on the - Link to Speech |
|
Point of Order: Rectification Procedure
4 speeches (139 words) Wednesday 22nd April 2026 - Commons Chamber Mentions: 1: Judith Cummins (Lab - Bradford South) I call Alberto Costa on a point of order in connection with the code of conduct, to rectify a failure - Link to Speech |
| Select Committee Documents |
|---|
|
Wednesday 20th May 2026
Formal Minutes - Formal Minutes 2024-26 Backbench Business Committee Found: Day 2025 Dr Peter Prinsley: Funding of the BBC World Service Jim Shannon: World Asthma Day Alberto Costa |
|
Monday 18th May 2026
Report - 1st Report - Health and Wellbeing Administration Committee Found: Bob Blackman (Conservative; Harrow East) Bambos Charalambous (Labour; Southgate and Wood Green) Alberto Costa |
|
Tuesday 5th May 2026
Attendance statistics - Members' Attendance 2024-2026 (Administration Committee) Administration Committee Found: Bambos Charalambous (Labour, Southgate and Wood Green) (added 31 Mar 2025) 21 of 27 (77.8%) Alberto Costa |
| Department Publications - Statistics |
|---|
|
Monday 27th April 2026
Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government Source Page: The Rycroft Review: Report of the independent review into countering foreign financial influence and interference in UK politics Document: (PDF) Found: Hatton MP , member of the All-Party Parliamentary Group on Anti-Corruption and Responsible Tax Alberto Costa |