Information between 1st June 2026 - 21st June 2026
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.
| Division Votes |
|---|
|
2 Jun 2026 - Armed Forces Bill - View Vote Context Alberto Costa voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 85 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 99 Noes - 371 |
|
2 Jun 2026 - Armed Forces Bill - View Vote Context Alberto Costa voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 91 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 170 Noes - 301 |
|
2 Jun 2026 - Armed Forces Bill - View Vote Context Alberto Costa voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 91 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 171 Noes - 302 |
|
10 Jun 2026 - Railways Bill - View Vote Context Alberto Costa voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 89 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 155 Noes - 279 |
|
10 Jun 2026 - Railways Bill - View Vote Context Alberto Costa voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 87 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 278 Noes - 149 |
|
10 Jun 2026 - Railways Bill - View Vote Context Alberto Costa voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 88 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 167 Noes - 266 |
|
17 Jun 2026 - National Security (State Threats) Bill - View Vote Context Alberto Costa voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 76 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 144 Noes - 244 |
|
17 Jun 2026 - National Security (State Threats) Bill - View Vote Context Alberto Costa voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 75 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 135 Noes - 258 |
|
17 Jun 2026 - National Security (State Threats) Bill - View Vote Context Alberto Costa voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 77 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 143 Noes - 249 |
|
17 Jun 2026 - National Security (State Threats) Bill - View Vote Context Alberto Costa voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 81 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 85 Noes - 317 |
|
17 Jun 2026 - National Security (State Threats) Bill (Allocation of Time) - View Vote Context Alberto Costa voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 81 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 233 Noes - 94 |
|
3 Jun 2026 - Agriculture - View Vote Context Alberto Costa voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 90 Conservative No votes vs 1 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 302 Noes - 153 |
|
8 Jun 2026 - Steel Industry (Nationalisation) Bill - View Vote Context Alberto Costa voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 79 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 145 Noes - 251 |
|
8 Jun 2026 - Steel Industry (Nationalisation) Bill - View Vote Context Alberto Costa voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 79 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 81 Noes - 266 |
|
16 Jun 2026 - Cyber Security and Resilience (Network and Information Systems) Bill - View Vote Context Alberto Costa voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 80 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 151 Noes - 258 |
|
16 Jun 2026 - Business without Debate - View Vote Context Alberto Costa voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 78 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 262 Noes - 86 |
|
16 Jun 2026 - Cyber Security and Resilience (Network and Information Systems) Bill - View Vote Context Alberto Costa voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 82 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 162 Noes - 246 |
| Speeches |
|---|
|
Alberto Costa speeches from: Steel Tariffs
Alberto Costa contributed 1 speech (71 words) Wednesday 17th June 2026 - Commons Chamber Department for Business and Trade |
| Written Answers |
|---|
|
Police Federation of England and Wales
Asked by: Alberto Costa (Conservative - South Leicestershire) Tuesday 9th June 2026 Question to the Home Office: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, whether she has made an assessment of the potential merits of conducting (a) an independent review and (b) an inquiry into the Police Federation of England and Wales. Answered by Sarah Jones - Minister of State (Home Office) The Government wants to see a strong staff association that provides a robust voice for police officers and represents their interests effectively. There is a statutory duty on the Home Secretary to ensure that there shall continue to be a Police Federation for England and Wales for the purpose of representing members of the police forces in England and Wales, and special constables. I hold regular meetings with the Federation and consistently challenge the leadership to show how they are responding to the issues outlined in the Independent Review which reported last year, as well as how they are reforming to improve their operation and representation of members. Recognising widely-reported concerns about the Police Federation of England and Wales (PFEW), we expect to see clear plans and rapid, demonstrable improvement in the PFEW’s operation. As we said in our White Paper, in the absence of such improvements, this Government stands ready to bring forward reforms to ensure that the interests of rank-and-file officers are properly, effectively and robustly represented. |
|
Police Federation of England and Wales
Asked by: Alberto Costa (Conservative - South Leicestershire) Tuesday 9th June 2026 Question to the Home Office: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, what assessment she has made of the effectiveness of the Police Federation in representing its members. Answered by Sarah Jones - Minister of State (Home Office) The Government wants to see a strong staff association that provides a robust voice for police officers and represents their interests effectively. There is a statutory duty on the Home Secretary to ensure that there shall continue to be a Police Federation for England and Wales for the purpose of representing members of the police forces in England and Wales, and special constables. I hold regular meetings with the Federation and consistently challenge the leadership to show how they are responding to the issues outlined in the Independent Review which reported last year, as well as how they are reforming to improve their operation and representation of members. Recognising widely-reported concerns about the Police Federation of England and Wales (PFEW), we expect to see clear plans and rapid, demonstrable improvement in the PFEW’s operation. As we said in our White Paper, in the absence of such improvements, this Government stands ready to bring forward reforms to ensure that the interests of rank-and-file officers are properly, effectively and robustly represented. |
|
Police Federation of England and Wales
Asked by: Alberto Costa (Conservative - South Leicestershire) Tuesday 9th June 2026 Question to the Home Office: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, what level of oversight her Department has of the governance and reform of the Police Federation of England and Wales. Answered by Sarah Jones - Minister of State (Home Office) The Government wants to see a strong staff association that provides a robust voice for police officers and represents their interests effectively. There is a statutory duty on the Home Secretary to ensure that there shall continue to be a Police Federation for England and Wales for the purpose of representing members of the police forces in England and Wales, and special constables. I hold regular meetings with the Federation and consistently challenge the leadership to show how they are responding to the issues outlined in the Independent Review which reported last year, as well as how they are reforming to improve their operation and representation of members. Recognising widely-reported concerns about the Police Federation of England and Wales (PFEW), we expect to see clear plans and rapid, demonstrable improvement in the PFEW’s operation. As we said in our White Paper, in the absence of such improvements, this Government stands ready to bring forward reforms to ensure that the interests of rank-and-file officers are properly, effectively and robustly represented. |
|
Fractures: Health Services
Asked by: Alberto Costa (Conservative - South Leicestershire) Friday 5th June 2026 Question to the Department of Health and Social Care: To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, what comparative assessment he has made of England’s progress in providing universal access to Fracture Liaison Services with Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland's. Answered by Sharon Hodgson - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department of Health and Social Care) Health is a devolved matter to Scotland, Wales, and Northern Ireland. The Falls and Fragility Fracture Audit Programme is a clinical audit of fracture prevention care, delivered by the Royal College of Physicians. The Fracture Liaison Service database collects, measures, and reports on the care provided by Fracture Liaison Services in England, Wales, and Northern Ireland. The Royal College of Physicians publishes an annual report on Fracture Liaison Services in England and Wales. Due to differences in the way the data is recorded across the nations of the United Kingdom we have not made a comparative assessment. Our 10-Year Health Plan committed to rolling out Fracture Liaison Services across every part of England by 2030. Integrated care boards remain well-placed to make decisions according to local need. The renewed Women’s Health Strategy sets an expectation that integrated care boards prioritise community-based models when commissioning new fracture prevention services. |
|
Fractures: Health Services
Asked by: Alberto Costa (Conservative - South Leicestershire) Friday 5th June 2026 Question to the Department of Health and Social Care: To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, if he will make Fracture Liaison Services a mandated service for Integrated Care Boards. Answered by Sharon Hodgson - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department of Health and Social Care) Our 10-Year Health Plan committed to rolling out Fracture Liaison Services across every part of the country by 2030. Integrated care boards remain well-placed to make decisions according to local need. The renewed Women’s Health Strategy sets an expectation that integrated care boards prioritise community-based models when commissioning new fracture prevention services. |
| MP Financial Interests |
|---|
|
15th June 2026
Alberto Costa (Conservative - South Leicestershire) 3. Gifts, benefits and hospitality from UK sources All-Party Parliamentary Group for Italy - £41.40 Source |
|
15th June 2026
Alberto Costa (Conservative - South Leicestershire) 3. Gifts, benefits and hospitality from UK sources Italian Embassy in London - £160.00 Source |
| Parliamentary Debates |
|---|
|
Steel Tariffs
95 speeches (10,441 words) Wednesday 17th June 2026 - Commons Chamber Department for Business and Trade Mentions: 1: Chris McDonald (Lab - Stockton North) Reading (Standing Order No. 57)Patricia Ferguson, supported by Sarah Owen, Kirsteen Sullivan, Alberto Costa - Link to Speech |
| Calendar |
|---|
|
Wednesday 24th June 2026 5:30 p.m. Speaker's Committee for the Independent Parliamentary Standards Authority - Private Meeting View calendar - Add to calendar |