Debates between Adam Jogee and Andrew Griffith during the 2024 Parliament

Wed 24th Jun 2026

Petitions

Debate between Adam Jogee and Andrew Griffith
Wednesday 24th June 2026

(1 month ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
Andrew Griffith Portrait Andrew Griffith (Arundel and South Downs) (Con)
- View Speech - Hansard - - - Excerpts

I rise to present a petition from residents in my constituency of Arundel and South Downs in West Sussex. Hundreds of signatures have been gathered from local residents who see at first hand what feels like a constant attack on our countryside and country pursuits by this Government. For example, just in the past couple of weeks, we have seen the removal of plans for fast broadband fibre to thousands of rural homes. The petitioners therefore request

“that the House of Commons urges the Government to bring forward measures to actively support rural areas, farming, traditional country sports, including trail hunting and shooting, and the equestrian sector.”

Following is the full text of the petition:

[The petition of residents of Arundel and the South Downs,

Declares that the UK’s rural traditions and heritage are of great importance in preserving our natural landscapes and the wider economy.

The petitioners therefore request that the House of Commons urges the Government to bring forward measures to actively support rural areas, farming, traditional country sports (including trail hunting and shooting) and the equestrian sector.

And the petitioners remain, etc.]

[P003212]

Adam Jogee Portrait Adam Jogee (Newcastle-under-Lyme) (Lab)
- View Speech - Hansard - -

On this hot day I rise to present the petition of residents of the constituency of Newcastle-under-Lyme. I also draw the House’s attention to the declaration of interest from the new leader of Newcastle-under-Lyme borough council at the cabinet meeting yesterday.

The petition states:

The petition of residents of the constituency of Newcastle-under-Lyme,

Declares that the land to the south east of Junction 16 of the M6 should not be released from its green belt status for development as this would have a significantly detrimental impact on Audley residents; further declares that the proposed employment site represents a loss of 6% of the parish’s green belt, which would devastate the rural character of the conservation area; further declares that the proposed development would likely favour commuters over local people, increasing pressure on the A500/M6 roundabout and disrupting nearby rural lanes used by local people; further declares that the development is expected to cause poor air quality, noise, litter, 24-hour illumination and loss of habitat, while severely impacting views across the Cheshire plains and North Staffordshire; and further declares that, as the local planning authority tasked with producing the Local Plan, Newcastle-under-Lyme Borough Council has a responsibility to listen to the overwhelming concerns of its residents and ensure the long-term protection of the green belt by removing site allocation AB2.

The petitioners therefore request that the House of Commons urges the Government to encourage Newcastle-under-Lyme Borough Council to remove site allocation AB2 from its Local Plan and not to permit the release of green belt land for this development.

And the petitioners remain, etc.

[P003213]