National Insurance Contributions (Secondary Class 1 Contributions) Bill Debate
Full Debate: Read Full DebateViscount Stansgate
Main Page: Viscount Stansgate (Labour - Excepted Hereditary)Department Debates - View all Viscount Stansgate's debates with the HM Treasury
(1 day, 15 hours ago)
Grand CommitteeWe now move on to the next group. I call Amendment 6 in the name of the noble Baroness, Lady Neville-Rolfe.
My Lords, before we start on that amendment, it is 7.28 pm and the Committee is due to finish at 7.45 pm. It always used to be the custom that if we would cover only a very short part of a group, we would normally draw stumps at that stage. That is the way it has always been done in the past. Obviously, we do not absolutely have to finish every group, but we do not normally start a quite significant group with a large number of amendments when there are so few minutes left, so I would like clarification on what will happen in this Committee.
In answer to the noble Baroness, I am in the hands of the usual channels.
They were once described as some of the most polluted waterways in Europe.
I understand that we have the grace of an extra 10 minutes after 7.45 pm. My understanding was that we would like to carry on and that noble Lords would come back if we do not finish the group. However, the Minister says that he is fine to break now, so if that is the will of the Committee then I am happy to do so. We seemed to be making real progress; I apologise for breaking any convention, but I am happy to be reasonable.
I am grateful to the noble Baroness for those comments. In the spirit of good will in the Committee, this would be an appropriate time for us to draw stumps.
In the spirit of good will, the Committee is adjourned.