Information between 18th April 2026 - 28th April 2026
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.
| Division Votes |
|---|
|
20 Apr 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Maclean of Redditch voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 174 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 259 Noes - 180 |
|
20 Apr 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Maclean of Redditch voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 173 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 276 Noes - 169 |
|
20 Apr 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Maclean of Redditch voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 169 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 284 Noes - 158 |
|
20 Apr 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Maclean of Redditch voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 143 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 162 Noes - 151 |
|
20 Apr 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Maclean of Redditch voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 143 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 211 Noes - 150 |
|
20 Apr 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Maclean of Redditch voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 145 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 216 Noes - 148 |
|
20 Apr 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Maclean of Redditch voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 142 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 219 Noes - 144 |
|
23 Apr 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Maclean of Redditch voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 125 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 197 Noes - 144 |
|
23 Apr 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Maclean of Redditch voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 126 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 208 Noes - 138 |
|
23 Apr 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Maclean of Redditch voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 131 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 199 Noes - 146 |
|
23 Apr 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Maclean of Redditch voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 130 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 209 Noes - 145 |
|
23 Apr 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Maclean of Redditch voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 129 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 207 Noes - 141 |
|
27 Apr 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Maclean of Redditch voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 152 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 210 Noes - 145 |
|
27 Apr 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Maclean of Redditch voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 155 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 217 Noes - 145 |
|
27 Apr 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Maclean of Redditch voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 148 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 199 Noes - 144 |
|
27 Apr 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Maclean of Redditch voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 143 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 197 Noes - 129 |
| Written Answers |
|---|
|
Flood Re: Greater London
Asked by: Baroness Maclean of Redditch (Conservative - Life peer) Tuesday 21st April 2026 Question to the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs: To ask His Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of the benefits of redesigning the Flood Re scheme to allow its application to properties and houses in London which are (1) divided into three or more flats, and (2) blocks of flats. Answered by Baroness Hayman of Ullock - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs) The Flood Re scheme allows for insurers to offer discounted premiums to leasehold properties consisting of three or less units where the freeholder lives in one of the units. As larger blocks, of four or more units, are classified as a commercial business, the Flood Re scheme does not apply to buildings insurance, though tenants and leaseholders can access Flood Re supported contents insurance regardless of block size. There’s currently no evidence of a widespread systemic problem for residents in accessing insurance, where they are ineligible for Flood Re.
Defra regularly reviews scheme eligibility. Expanding Flood Re to businesses would introduce a new business levy, effectively forcing businesses nationwide and indirectly customers, to subsidise profit making firms in flood-areas. Any expansion to Flood Re’s scope would need careful consideration of impacts on scheme operation and costs. |
|
Gender Dysphoria
Asked by: Baroness Maclean of Redditch (Conservative - Life peer) Tuesday 28th April 2026 Question to the Department of Health and Social Care: To ask His Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answer by Baroness Merron on 10 March (HL14740), how the Cass Review recommendations will be implemented and monitored across NHS children and young people gender services. Answered by Baroness Merron - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department of Health and Social Care) On 1 April 2026, NHS England published a final service specification for National Health Service children and young people's gender services, which incorporates the findings and recommendations of the final report of the Cass Review, including adoption of the new Holistic Assessment Framework. NHS England continues to have oversight of implementation of the various Cass Review recommendations in 2026/27, in line with the implementation plan published in August 2024. NHS England chairs a National Portfolio Board for NHS Children and Young People’s Gender Services, which is the vehicle for monitoring progress for implementing recommendations from the Cass Review. Membership of the board includes officials from the Department of Health and Social Care, Baroness Cass, the independent Chair of the National Provider Network, representatives of the royal colleges of medicine, senior clinicians, the NHS National Medical Director for Specialised Services, and the NHS National Director for Specialised Services. |