All 1 Debates between Lord Hammond of Runnymede and John Pugh

Thu 25th Nov 2010

Rail Investment

Debate between Lord Hammond of Runnymede and John Pugh
Thursday 25th November 2010

(13 years, 5 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Nigel Evans Portrait Mr Deputy Speaker (Mr Nigel Evans)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

Last, but certainly not least, I call John Pugh.

John Pugh Portrait Dr John Pugh (Southport) (LD)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

On a final jarring note, there is an impression that capital investment in rail usually means rail investment in the capital. What can the Minister do to disabuse me of my prejudice, perhaps by publishing per-region figures?

Lord Hammond of Runnymede Portrait Mr Hammond
- Hansard - -

I thank my hon. Friend for his question. It is of course true that two huge rail projects are going ahead in the capital—Thameslink and Crossrail. The good news is that because both projects will between them deliver 1,800 new rail carriages, they will release large numbers of perfectly serviceable electric rail cars, which themselves make the case for further electrification of commuter lines in the north-west and on the great western main line. There are benefits for everybody, not merely for London and the south-east, deriving from the Crossrail and Thameslink investments.